CN China All but Ends Hong Kong Democracy With ‘Patriots Only’ Rule - Bugmen being bugmen



HONG KONG—China drew the curtain on decades of adversarial politics in Hong Kong as the national legislature approved electoral changes that would put pro-Beijing loyalists firmly in charge of the city and squeeze opposition groups from elected office.

Thursday’s near-unanimous vote by the National People’s Congress paves the way for China’s top lawmaking body to revamp as soon as next month how the former British colony picks its leader and legislators. The overhaul will give Beijing much greater control over local elections that were meant to be partly democratic—thanks to an effective veto against candidates deemed unpatriotic.

Chinese officials say the changes are meant to close legal loopholes that had allowed anti-China forces to impede governance and incite unrest in Hong Kong, which was rocked by mass antigovernment protests in 2019.
“The decision is very clear-cut,” Premier Li Keqiang told reporters after the vote. The aim is to uphold the principle of “patriots governing Hong Kong” and improve Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework for administering the city, he said.

Opposition groups in Hong Kong say the change is part of Beijing’s broad efforts to wipe out dissent locally, eroding many of the rights and freedoms that residents were promised for the half-century following Britain’s handover of the territory to Chinese rule in 1997.


“It’s the biggest regression of the system since the handover,” said Lo Kin-hei, chairman of Hong Kong’s Democratic Party, who is out on bail after his arrest last year for allegedly participating in an unauthorized assembly in late 2019. “What we’ve seen over the past year is that authorities will do whatever they want, whenever they want, in a way that was unimaginable before.”

Some foreign governments, mainly Western, criticized China for allegedly reneging on pledges to preserve Hong Kong’s system of self-governance until 2047 and eventually allow universal suffrage in the territory. “The United States condemns the PRC’s continuing assault on democratic institutions in Hong Kong,” Secretary of State Antony Blinken said in a statement. “These actions deny Hong Kongers a voice in their own governance.”

U.K. Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab criticized the resolution as Beijing’s latest effort to “hollow out the space for democratic debate in Hong Kong.” The European Union said it would consider taking unspecified measures in response to a move that would impact “democratic accountability and political pluralism in Hong Kong.” Japan, meanwhile, expressed “grave concern” and urged China to allow fair elections in the territory.

Zhang Xiaoming, deputy director of Beijing’s Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office, dismissed the criticism, telling reporters on Friday that electoral reforms in the territory are China’s internal affairs and interference from abroad wouldn’t be tolerated. He also accused the U.S. of hypocrisy in trying to meddle in Hong Kong’s elections after enduring its own electoral turmoil in recent months.

Confidence among some foreign businesses in Hong Kong has been shaken during the turmoil, with executives voicing concern over Beijing’s tightening control and some firms deciding to relocate staff to other regional hubs such as Singapore. Other companies, many of whom are reliant on the mainland market or Hong Kong’s role as a finance hub, have been more sanguine about prospects following China’s efforts to restore social stability.

The resolution mandates the creation of a commission in Hong Kong that ensures that prospective officeholders conform with criteria laid down in the city’s miniconstitution and national-security legislation.

The resolution calls for expanding Hong Kong’s election committee—originally tasked with choosing the city’s chief executive—to 1,500 seats from 1,200. Its specifications on membership of the revamped committee didn’t mention district councilors, a voting bloc that was poised to be dominated by pro-democracy politicians.

More significantly, the committee will be empowered to select a portion of the local legislature—which would expand to 90 seats from 70—and to participate in the nominating process for candidates. A senior Chinese official said last week the committee would directly fill a “relatively large share” of the seats, but the resolution didn’t give a number.

The committee was once tasked with filling a small portion of legislative seats, but this practice stopped after the 2000 legislative election.

Under existing rules, half the legislature is directly elected by the public, and the other half selected by professional and special interest groups. These two methods will continue to be used in deciding membership of the expanded legislature, though the resolution didn’t specify how many seats would be chosen in these ways.

The resolution didn’t provide further details on the proposed overhaul, or set a timeline. The new rules would be enacted through amendments to so-called annex documents that supplement the miniconstitution. Hong Kong members of the National People’s Congress say the new rules could be completed as soon as April.

“The electoral reform is meant to ensure dissidents cannot get elected to the Legislative Council,” said Steve Tsang, director of the SOAS China Institute in London, who specializes in Hong Kong politics. “This is important because it reverses the direction of political development in Hong Kong set by the British before the end of the colonial era.”

Hong Kong’s government postponed legislative elections scheduled for last September by at least a year, citing the pandemic. The city is set to pick its chief executive next year. The incumbent, Carrie Lam, who has a low public-approval rating, hasn’t said whether she intends to run for a second five-year term.

Beijing has sought to stamp out dissent in Hong Kong since months of antigovernment protests caused citywide chaos in 2019. China’s top legislature imposed a national-security law on the city in June, and authorities have since arrested more than 100 pro-democracy figures, including many opposition groups’ leaders. Authorities have also disqualified pro-democracy politicians from the Hong Kong legislature.

Chinese officials have said they aren’t attempting to curb criticism of the government.

“We are not speaking about creating a monolithic government…we understand that Hong Kong is a plural society with a blend of Chinese and Western culture,” said Song Ru’an, the Chinese Foreign Ministry’s deputy commissioner in the territory, at a Tuesday briefing.

Even so, “when we talk about patriotism, we are not talking about the abstraction of loving a cultural or historical China, but rather loving the currently existing People’s Republic of China under the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party,” Mr. Song said.

The vote on the resolution, coming on the final day of a weeklong session in Beijing of the National People’s Congress, was 2,895 in favor, none against, and one member abstaining.
 
Tip of my tongue.

Rhymes with Yahtzee Her Money.
Also pretty much the playbook the British Empire used as well...It is literally the playbook of every fascist dipshit that ends up getting booted or putting a bullet in their head in a bunker.

China is rushing toward collapse with the kind of big dick energy you rarely get to see but here we are and certain ice cream eaters are backing the fascists all the way.
 
Chinese officials say the changes are meant to close legal loopholes that had allowed anti-China forces to impede governance and incite unrest in Hong Kong, which was rocked by mass antigovernment protests in 2019.
“The decision is very clear-cut,” Premier Li Keqiang told reporters after the vote. The aim is to uphold the principle of “patriots governing Hong Kong” and improve Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework for administering the city, he said.
>Democrats' Chinese masters restrict suffrage and legislative candidacies in the name of social stability
>Democrats promote near-open electoral fraud and entryism by the Chinese-sympathizing DSA at local party levels
Gosh, it's almost as if universal suffrage destabilizes government and society and the grown-ups know it.
 
congratulations on completely ruining your most productive financial hub you literal mongoloids
Shenzhen and Shanghai have surpassed HK for more than half a decade now.
HK (and Shenzhen) are basically bugpod hellscapes. The difference is, any CPC construction plans can't really go through in HK because of laws and potential opposition from normies. CPC wanted to reclaim land and do their usual shit. All this dumb shit started because some HK guy murdered his Taiwanese girlfriend in Taiwan and fled to HK.

This is the future of giant cities, live in the 6 square metres pod and eat those bugs, bigot.
1615557352096.png
 
Shenzhen and Shanghai have surpassed HK for more than half a decade now.
HK (and Shenzhen) are basically bugpod hellscapes. The difference is, any CPC construction plans can't really go through in HK because of laws and potential opposition from normies. CPC wanted to reclaim land and do their usual shit. All this dumb shit started because some HK guy murdered his Taiwanese girlfriend in Taiwan and fled to HK.

This is the future of giant cities, live in the 6 square metres pod and eat those bugs, bigot.
View attachment 1990921
the problem isn't the productivity or size of the city but what kind of city Hong Kong was. Hong Kong was a financial center where foreigners and foreign business could feel comfortable dumping their capital into as a safe conduit for Chinese investment and business.

Nobody wants to directly interact with the Chinese especially when their 3 inchers are at full mast ready to prove how ready they are to hate fuck the world. It's most likely that business will, instead, redirect to Western friendly centers of commerce like Taipei and Singapore - this is also worsened with Boris giving every HK citizen UK citizenship.

The worst thing for business is fear, China stripped global traders the ability to indirectly interact with China on Chinese land, removing all compromise and comfort.
 
Nobody wants to directly interact with the Chinese especially when their 3 inchers are at full mast ready to prove how ready they are to hate fuck the world. It's most likely that business will, The worst thing for business is fear, China stripped global traders the ability to indirectly interact with China on Chinese land, removing all compromise and comfort.
China is probably feeling overconfident as the world’s factory and rising superpower, it’s also one of the only countries to boast a continuous rise in annual wages for its people. They have the industry to make just about everything themselves so they know they can risk it all and still stay afloat, too big to not trade with.

Permanent normal trade relations with China was a big mistake. When Dengist reforms were introduced the international community naively thought China was going to be a partner in the world community not realizing that it’s a pillar of the CCP to undo the century of humiliation and restore China’s “lost” territories. Xi Xingping in particular fancies himself to be at the vanguard of the next stage of the revolution where China realizes its destiny to become the world’s leading superpower.

I mean their growth as a country is remarkable and they’ve lifted the poorest people in China out of poverty ahead of schedule but their political ambitions to enforce the Xi Xingping personality cult throughout China are disturbing. People who read Xi Xingping thought are given discounts on earphones so it’s this odd blend of consumer capitalism and authoritarian personality cult. Capitalism in this way no longer needs democracy. They can keep putting Uighurs in concentration camps and Disney will still work with them in that same region to film Mulan while a genocide takes place.
 
Last edited:
China is probably feeling overconfident as the world’s factory and rising superpower, it’s also one of the only countries to boast a continuous rise in annual wages for its people. They have the industry to make just about everything themselves so they know they can risk it all and still stay afloat, too big to not trade with.

Permanent normal trade relations with China was a big mistake. When Dengist reforms were introduced the international community naively thought China was going to be a partner in the world community not realizing that it’s a pillar of the CCP to undo the century of humiliation and restore China’s “lost” territories. Xi Xingping in particular fancies himself to be at the vanguard of the next stage of the revolution where China realizes its destiny to become the leader of the world..
it's not only overconfidence but China is trying to run out the clock. China needs to act while they have a massive population of highly productive 30 - 60 yrolds out of fear for the dramatic demographic collapse that'll follow. It reminds me a lot how White Nationalist movements have become increasingly aggressive because mass immigration is reaching levels they see as critical.

As Modi becomes increasingly authoritarian towards Indians while open to the Global West he'll try to create environments that companies feel comfortable manufacturing in and hopefully, effectively create an industrial rival or at least alternative to China. Further ostracization from the West will also encourage them to act out, most likely impotently.

While China is the most significant rival to the American Military, I still don't think that makes them a significant military threat.
 
Back