CN China's trajectory proof that it needs no lecturing

Link (Archive)
China's trajectory proof that it needs no lecturing

By James Smith Published: Jul 16, 2021 06:32 PM
10C86530-3602-43FC-9C7F-6AFCB6E0E7EE.jpeg

This year marks the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China (CPC) . From a small gathering in Shanghai, to a political juggernaut with 95 million members, the CPC has transformed China dramatically over a journey of a century, attaining power in 1949 and creating the People's Republic of China (PRC), which has now become the world's second-largest economy. Despite the zealous jargon from Western countries, the CPC finds itself overwhelmingly supported by the people of China for the rapid transformation it has heralded, taking China from a backward and impoverished nation into what Chinese President Xi Jinping termed a "moderately prosperous society" and likewise establishing a strong, capable and sovereign nation which has been able to end the "century of humiliation" and resist Western aggression against it.

The West does not understand the Chinese experience, they do not try to understand. They preach to China an idealism which bears no consideration of the context of China's history. Prior to the CPC, the country was one of the poorest nations on earth. Life in China was tough.

The Republic of China, of which had replaced the collapsed Qing Dynasty in 1911, was divided, weak and chaotic. Its government had neither the power nor the will to secure sovereignty over all its territory, with provinces being controlled by powerful warlords which hindered development and depleted infrastructure. The country had been divided and partitioned by the influence of Western powers, thus heralding the "century of humiliation" - amid the chaos of the provinces, colonial nations such as Britain, France and Germany held concessions in the cities where they sought to impose their own laws and exploit China's own markets for their own gain.

It is no wonder in such an environment that a tremendous desire for political change existed amongst the Chinese population of which cemented itself in support for the CPC, an organization which provided a revolutionary vision for change. The goals were always clear, to reverse China's decline, to bring China out of backwards and to re-establish it as a modern, prosperous and sovereign nation that could overcome the legacy of "humiliation."

Communism was appealing because driven by the events in Russia, it was seen as a force of modernity, a set of tools to rebuild a nation and likewise to liberate the vast Chinese peasantry from the bondage of serfdom.

The PRC established in 1949 is known as "new China," precisely because it represented a clear break from the past. The China which it was born into in 1921 no longer exists. While the West likes to pick on the challenges and mistakes experienced throughout the CPC's tenure, the Party has shown its strength, its adaptability, pragmatism and "method" based solutions through Deng Xiaoping theory, which has enabled its rapid rise, reform and opening-up. Now, modern China is now a moderately wealthy country which has a higher GDP per capita on average than most of Latin America and Eastern Europe, the world's largest domestic consumer market, and an ever growing and sprawling national infrastructure which rivals any other country on Earth.

The CPC has likewise won the confidence of the Chinese people by being able to defeat challengers from foreign aggressions accordingly. China's intervention into the Korean War and ability to prevent a coalition of Western allies from conquering North Korea was seen as the "end" to the century of humiliation and the rise of China as a formidable military power. Yet that it is not all, as the West has sought again to try and ensnare the country such as through riots in Hong Kong, it has been able to sweep away the legacy of colonialism there and thus ensure the country will never be partitioned again.

Xi's speech subsequently placed emphasis on the fact that "China will not be bullied" and vowed accordingly to reunify Taiwan with the Chinese mainland. In the Chinese experience, the CPC is seen as a guardian and protector of the nation, and not an oppressor or something that is unwanted. The West is dogmatic in believing that liberal democracy is the only way, yet no other ideology or organization was capable of reviving and reunifying China as coherently as the CPC could, and this is why its approval is so high. China does not need lecturing or preaching from others, nor does it need to be told how to govern itself when its own trajectory has arguably been an enormous success story. The CPC changed China for the better, and it is always important to look at the whole than to cherry pick episodes from long ago.

The author is a political and historical relations analyst. opinion@globaltimes.com.cn
 
There's an astounding amount of bullshit in this article, so much so that even scrutinizing one paragraph would take forever. For example:

The Republic of China, of which had replaced the collapsed Qing Dynasty in 1911, was divided, weak and chaotic.
Thanks in no small part to the insurgency carried out by the communists for decades. Deliberately weakening and undermining the previous government and then bragging about how you restored order after you toppled it is kind of a dick move IMO.

Its government had neither the power nor the will to secure sovereignty over all its territory, with provinces being controlled by powerful warlords which hindered development and depleted infrastructure.
The warlord issue was mostly resolved by the Northern Expedition in 1928 and the Central Plains War in 1930. China was on the way to being unified when the Japanese invaded in 1937. Even Mao admitted that the Japanese invasion saved his ass.

The country had been divided and partitioned by the influence of Western powers, thus heralding the "century of humiliation" - amid the chaos of the provinces, colonial nations such as Britain, France and Germany held concessions in the cities where they sought to impose their own laws and exploit China's own markets for their own gain.
Even if you accept the premise that colonialism is all that bad in the first place, China got off incredibly lightly compared to India or Africa. Most of the concessions were temporary leases that were eventually handed back to China when said leases expired (Weihaiwei in 1930, Hong Kong in 1997, etc.), China was never truly colonized by the Europeans. Only the Russians and the Japanese were in the business of taking land permanently from China (land they still haven't gotten back, by the way), a fact which hasn't prevented China from having very warm relations with the Russians.
 
The author is quite a sellout. Seems like he copied and pasted a lot of what his handlers told him to rather than rephrasing it in a way that’d stand out less, assuming of course it’s not just a pen name. But sure, if you think China’s on a positive trajectory, more power to you. I unironically think India has a better chance of becoming the next hegemony and that China peaked ~6 years ago along with its number of workers.
 
Last edited:
The author is quite a sellout. Seems like he copied and pasted a lot of what his handlers told him too rather than rephrasing it in a way that’d stand out less, assuming of course it’s not just a pen name. But sure, if you think China’s on a positive trajectory, more power to you. I unironically think India has a better chance of becoming the next hegemony and that China peaked ~6 years ago along with its number of workers.
nah it has to be someone else. Both china and india's birth rates are just above replacement levels. As they develop they'll slump into 1.5 birth rate that europe and japan has.
 
nah it has to be someone else. Both china and india's birth rates are just above replacement levels. As they develop they'll slump into 1.5 birth rate that europe and japan has.
I was fairly certain that China was already at 1.5, or near it, per woman while India was above 2. Edit I could very well be wrong.
 
Last edited:
I thought China's numbers were generally considered to be lies in order to obfuscate the sort of corruption that would make the American Uniparty and the European Faggot Class blush.

The only thing they got right when compared to the other two groups is that they made sure the people can't talk or think out of line without consequences. Though the Western governments are working on that so China better watch out!
 
Fuck the Chinese Communist Party. The way I see it, the Republic of China government in Taiwan are still the legitimate government of ALL China. The Commie Chinks sat back like cowards as the Republic of China did all the fighting against the Japanese invaders in China. Then, when the Japanese Empire was defeated at the end of World War Two and the Republic of China troops were exhausted and diminished in number, the Communist bandits came in to illegitimately take control and forced the Republic government to go into exile on Taiwan. The CCP are nothing but murderers, rapists, thieves, and cowards. They have no honor. Mao was a pedophile scumbag and a bigger monster than all the Nazis combined. Any American shilling for the CCP should be tried as a traitor and face capital punishment.
 
Back