CN China's trajectory proof that it needs no lecturing

Link (Archive)
China's trajectory proof that it needs no lecturing

By James Smith Published: Jul 16, 2021 06:32 PM
10C86530-3602-43FC-9C7F-6AFCB6E0E7EE.jpeg

This year marks the 100th anniversary of the founding of the Communist Party of China (CPC) . From a small gathering in Shanghai, to a political juggernaut with 95 million members, the CPC has transformed China dramatically over a journey of a century, attaining power in 1949 and creating the People's Republic of China (PRC), which has now become the world's second-largest economy. Despite the zealous jargon from Western countries, the CPC finds itself overwhelmingly supported by the people of China for the rapid transformation it has heralded, taking China from a backward and impoverished nation into what Chinese President Xi Jinping termed a "moderately prosperous society" and likewise establishing a strong, capable and sovereign nation which has been able to end the "century of humiliation" and resist Western aggression against it.

The West does not understand the Chinese experience, they do not try to understand. They preach to China an idealism which bears no consideration of the context of China's history. Prior to the CPC, the country was one of the poorest nations on earth. Life in China was tough.

The Republic of China, of which had replaced the collapsed Qing Dynasty in 1911, was divided, weak and chaotic. Its government had neither the power nor the will to secure sovereignty over all its territory, with provinces being controlled by powerful warlords which hindered development and depleted infrastructure. The country had been divided and partitioned by the influence of Western powers, thus heralding the "century of humiliation" - amid the chaos of the provinces, colonial nations such as Britain, France and Germany held concessions in the cities where they sought to impose their own laws and exploit China's own markets for their own gain.

It is no wonder in such an environment that a tremendous desire for political change existed amongst the Chinese population of which cemented itself in support for the CPC, an organization which provided a revolutionary vision for change. The goals were always clear, to reverse China's decline, to bring China out of backwards and to re-establish it as a modern, prosperous and sovereign nation that could overcome the legacy of "humiliation."

Communism was appealing because driven by the events in Russia, it was seen as a force of modernity, a set of tools to rebuild a nation and likewise to liberate the vast Chinese peasantry from the bondage of serfdom.

The PRC established in 1949 is known as "new China," precisely because it represented a clear break from the past. The China which it was born into in 1921 no longer exists. While the West likes to pick on the challenges and mistakes experienced throughout the CPC's tenure, the Party has shown its strength, its adaptability, pragmatism and "method" based solutions through Deng Xiaoping theory, which has enabled its rapid rise, reform and opening-up. Now, modern China is now a moderately wealthy country which has a higher GDP per capita on average than most of Latin America and Eastern Europe, the world's largest domestic consumer market, and an ever growing and sprawling national infrastructure which rivals any other country on Earth.

The CPC has likewise won the confidence of the Chinese people by being able to defeat challengers from foreign aggressions accordingly. China's intervention into the Korean War and ability to prevent a coalition of Western allies from conquering North Korea was seen as the "end" to the century of humiliation and the rise of China as a formidable military power. Yet that it is not all, as the West has sought again to try and ensnare the country such as through riots in Hong Kong, it has been able to sweep away the legacy of colonialism there and thus ensure the country will never be partitioned again.

Xi's speech subsequently placed emphasis on the fact that "China will not be bullied" and vowed accordingly to reunify Taiwan with the Chinese mainland. In the Chinese experience, the CPC is seen as a guardian and protector of the nation, and not an oppressor or something that is unwanted. The West is dogmatic in believing that liberal democracy is the only way, yet no other ideology or organization was capable of reviving and reunifying China as coherently as the CPC could, and this is why its approval is so high. China does not need lecturing or preaching from others, nor does it need to be told how to govern itself when its own trajectory has arguably been an enormous success story. The CPC changed China for the better, and it is always important to look at the whole than to cherry pick episodes from long ago.

The author is a political and historical relations analyst. opinion@globaltimes.com.cn
 
I was fairly certain that China was already at 1.5, or near it, per woman while India was above 2. Edit I could very well be wrong.
That was my understanding as well. The "One Child" policy is likely to fuck China in the ass like a $2 whore as the country rapidly ages and there aren't nearly enough people to sustain their economic output.
 
That was my understanding as well. The "One Child" policy is likely to fuck China in the ass like a $2 whore as the country rapidly ages and there aren't nearly enough people to sustain their economic output.
Here's my favorite example of the havoc the "one-child policy" is very likely already wreaking.

China has no Social Security system as we know it. Primary support for aged parents still expected to be the child, maybe in some cases children.

Son from a one-child family marries daughter from a one-child family. Let's say just the husband works, for the sake of argument. You can have one person working to support himself, his wife, any child they may have, and to varying extents, as many as four parents/parents-in-law. In most cases that isn't going to work real well. More likely you'll have both husband and wife working, with the parents/parents-in-law taking at least some of the care of the child. Happens all over the world, been doing it forever. More doable than the first scenario, but am sure the first scenario also happens in China.
 
That was my understanding as well. The "One Child" policy is likely to fuck China in the ass like a $2 whore as the country rapidly ages and there aren't nearly enough people to sustain their economic output.
I wonder if they'll do what the EUrocucks do and start importing low IQ nogsbrilliant refugees to do the jobs that the natives have been pushed out of refuse to do.
 
  • Like
Reactions: m1ddl3m4rch
I wonder if they'll do what the EUrocucks do and start importing low IQ nogsbrilliant refugees to do the jobs that the natives have been pushed out of refuse to do.
Unlikely. At least not nogs or goatfuckers. The Chinese regime is probably already heavily funding AI & robotics sectors to ensure that when the chinks get too old, the robots would've already done the industry that would be impossible with such an elderly populace.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
I wonder if they'll do what the EUrocucks do and start importing low IQ nogsbrilliant refugees to do the jobs that the natives have been pushed out of refuse to do.
From what I understand, the CCP has already tried that and the "foreign workers" were treated so poorly, they all ended up going back to their native hovels, and warning everyone about working in China. As such, apparently even people from 3rd world hell holes are reluctant to go to China and be whipped like dogs.
 
Unlikely. At least not nogs or goatfuckers. The Chinese regime is probably already heavily funding AI & robotics sectors to ensure that when the chinks get too old, the robots would've already done the industry that would be impossible with such an elderly populace.
Still very capital-intensive, and is only really useful for a high-income economy- which China is currently racing to become. Most of the cheap consumer product manufacturing will never be profitable with bots- which is why I suppose they’re now shifting to SE Asia and Africa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JosephStalin
From what I understand, the CCP has already tried that and the "foreign workers" were treated so poorly, they all ended up going back to their native hovels, and warning everyone about working in China. As such, apparently even people from 3rd world hell holes are reluctant to go to China and be whipped like dogs.
Give it time. Western nations used to be 'racist' too, and look where they've ended up.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Trapitalism
Back