CN China’s Xi goes full Stalin with purge - In a sign of instability in Beijing’s top ranks, foreign policy and defense officials are vanishing as Xi roots out perceived enemies.

xi.png
Since his reign began in 2012, Xi’s endless purges have removed millions of officials | Andy Wong-Pool/Getty Images

Something is rotten in the imperial court of Chairman Xi Jinping.

While the world is distracted by war in the Middle East and Ukraine, a Stalin-like purge is sweeping through China’s ultra-secretive political system, with profound implications for the global economy and even the prospects for peace in the region.

The signals emanating from Beijing are unmistakable, even as China’s security services have ramped up repression to totalitarian levels, making it almost impossible to know what is really happening inside the country.

The unexplained disappearance and removal of China’s foreign and defense ministers — both Xi loyalists who were handpicked and elevated mere months before they went missing earlier this year — are just two examples.

Other high-profile victims include the generals in charge of China’s nuclear weapons program and some of the most senior officials overseeing the Chinese financial sector. Several of these former Xi acolytes have apparently died in custody.

Another ominous sign is the untimely death of Li Keqiang, China’s recently retired prime minister — No. 2 in the Communist hierarchy — who supposedly died of a heart attack in a swimming pool in Shanghai in late October, despite enjoying some of the world’s best medical care. Following his death, Xi ordered public mourning for his former rival be heavily curtailed.

In the minds of many in China, “heart attack in a swimming pool” has the same connotation that “falling out of a window” does for Russian apparatchiks who anger or offend Vladimir Putin.

Since his reign began in 2012, Xi Jinping’s endless purges have removed millions of officials — from top-ranked Communist Party “tigers” down to lowly bureaucratic “flies,” to use Xi’s evocative terminology.

What’s different today is that the officials being neutralized are not members of hostile political factions but loyalists from the inner ring of Xi’s own clique, leading to serious questions over the regime’s stability.

With such a febrile atmosphere in the celestial capital of Beijing, there are fears that an isolated and paranoid Chairman Xi could miscalculate, provoke armed conflict with one of its weaker neighbors or even launch a full-scale invasion of democratic Taiwan in order to distract from his domestic troubles.

Enemies everywhere​

The political earthquakes rippling out from the old imperial leadership compound of Zhongnanhai are exacerbating the already dire state of the Chinese economy.

“We see a China domestically that is challenged; an aging society, demography, a severe housing crisis, slowing down growth, unexpected unemployment because the young generation leaving university does not find adequate jobs in the private sector anymore,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, who heads to Beijing this week with her European Council counterpart Charles Michel for the first face-to-face EU-China meeting in nearly five years, told POLITICO last week. “So quite some challenges domestically.”

Chinese financiers and businesspeople (quietly) complain they are required to spend countless hours studying “Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era” — a painfully turgid governing mantra that boils down to ideology-free totalitarian rule and the return of a personality cult to China.

In recent weeks, the country’s leading investment bank banned negative macroeconomic or market commentary, as well as any behavior that could suggest its bankers lead “hedonistic lifestyles.”

Not long after he ascended to chairmanship of the Communist Party in 2012, Xi began purging his real and perceived enemies in an “anti-corruption” campaign that never really ended.

Hundreds of senior officers in the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), as well as thousands of top Party officials, have been arrested, disappeared or “suicided” (driven to commit suicide or killed in circumstances made to look like suicide).

The beneficiaries of this perennial purge have been provincial bureaucrats who worked with Xi earlier in his career and whose main qualification is unquestioning loyalty to the “people’s leader.”

Small town boys​

These former small-town officials now make up the majority of the Standing Committee of the Politburo, which wields ultimate power in China.

One such loyal figure was Qin Gang, a former spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry whose career went stratospheric after he became China’s chief protocol officer, overseeing most of Chairman Xi’s interactions with foreign dignitaries between 2014 and 2018.

After a brief stint as a vice foreign minister, Qin was named ambassador to Washington in July 2021 and foreign minister barely 18 months later — a uniquely rapid rise that Chinese officialdom attributed to his proximity and personal favor with the “core leader.”

On June 25 this year, barely six months after becoming minister, Qin held meetings in Beijing with the foreign ministers of Sri Lanka and Vietnam, as well as Deputy Russian Foreign Minister Andrey Rudenko.

Then he vanished.

According to several people with access to high-level Chinese officials, Rudenko’s real mission in Beijing was to inform Xi that his foreign minister and several top officers in the PLA had been compromised by western intelligence agencies.

Following his disappearance, lurid tales emerged of Qin’s affair with a reporter for Chinese broadcaster Phoenix TV called Fu Xiaotian, with whom he allegedly fathered a son who is a U.S. citizen. The stories circulated widely online with the apparent consent of Chinese cyber censors.

Fu attended Cambridge University, a traditional recruiting ground for Britain’s intelligence agencies, and first met Qin more than a decade ago when he was posted to the Chinese Embassy in London.

In 2016, Churchill College, Fu’s alma mater at Cambridge, named a garden after her in gratitude for her “very rare … series of generous gifts,” reportedly adding up to at least £250,000, an enormous sum for most journalists.

Before the foreign minister disappeared, Fu all but named Qin as the father of her child on social media.

Then, in April, she flew back to Beijing on what appears to have been a government-chartered private jet and has not been heard from since.

China’s propaganda system is strongly hinting that the affair and illegitimate American child are the reasons for Qin’s purge.

Rocket men​

According to several people with access to top officials, the real reason for his abrupt disappearance was Qin’s involvement in a much more serious scandal, involving the defense minister and the generals who commanded China’s “rocket force,” which oversees the country’s nuclear weapons program.

At almost the same time Qin went missing, the top commander of the rocket force, Li Yuchao, along with his deputy Liu Guangbin and former deputy Zhang Zhenzhong, all also disappeared.

Several other senior serving and former officers from the force were likewise detained and at least one former deputy commander died of unspecified illness, according to state media reports.

The missing commanders were eventually formally fired and replaced by officers from the navy and airforce, a very rare development since top commanders of the rocket force have almost always been promoted from within the service.

Not long after the rocket force purge was officially acknowledged, Li Shangfu, the man Xi picked as China’s defense minister in March this year, also vanished. His formal dismissal was announced in late October.

Further adding to the intrigue was a terse state media report on the day before Qin was formally removed as foreign minister in July. It said Wang Shaojun, commander since 2015 of the Central Guard unit that protects China’s top leaders and oversees Chairman Xi’s personal bodyguard, had died three months earlier due to “ineffective medical treatment.”

China’s nuclear weapons program has massively expanded in recent years and, according to people with access to top Chinese officials, Russian Deputy Minister Rudenko’s message to Xi included allegations that Qin and relatives of top rocket force officers had helped pass Chinese nuclear secrets to Western intelligence agencies.

Two of these people claim that Qin died, either from suicide or torture, in late July in the military hospital in Beijing that treats China’s top leaders.

Hostile forces​

Given the opacity of the Chinese system, it is impossible to confirm these accounts definitively and the Chinese government does not comment on the inner workings of the Communist Party.

Senior Western intelligence officials declined to comment or discuss the matter when asked about the purges in China.

But the sensational nature of the claims themselves make clear the feverish paranoia permeating Beijing.

Whether by accident or design, that mood was exacerbated over the summer when Director of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency Bill Burns said the CIA had “made progress” rebuilding its network within China and had a “strong human intelligence capability” in the country.

That paranoia extends into all parts of the bureaucracy and economy and seems to have tarnished anyone seen as too Westernized or too close to “hostile Western forces.”

One senior Chinese finance official who speaks fluent English and is a regular fixture on the international conference circuit told POLITICO by email that he could no longer attend an upcoming event outside China and was unable to speak on the phone.

He joins dozens of senior finance officials who have been removed in recent months, often after being accused of corruption.

An associate of this official said he was currently being investigated for being “too close to America” and “possibly a spy.”

This seems to be the inevitable fate of anyone who engages too eagerly with foreigners and should serve as a warning to those who still believe China is open for business with the West.

Article Link

Archive
 
I swear, 50 years from now we'll discover the CIA put mercury in the water of the leaders of China and Russia to make them act like fucking retards at a time when they can usurp the USA
Even with competent leaders they couldn't

If they were competent they wouldn't be trying to usurp the West in the first place
 
Politico? Before I got to the link at the end I was sure this would end up being an Epoch Times production

Things must be kinda not good if even the bought and paid for globalist shills who have spent 30 years sucking the Red chink micropeens are looking sideways at Beijing
Yeah, almost like the money's run dry. Ever notice how suddenly American politicians began taking a hard line against the place? The loyalty of American politicians is never for sale but always for rent.
 
Yeah, almost like the money's run dry. Ever notice how suddenly American politicians began taking a hard line against the place? The loyalty of American politicians is never for sale but always for rent.
I think they're also finally realizing that for them, a world where China numba wan isn't a world where they get to continue being the elite or even valued underlings, it's a world where they're John Daggett and the CCP is Bane
 
I think they're also finally realizing that for them, a world where China numba wan isn't a world where they get to continue being the elite or even valued underlings, it's a world where they're John Daggett and the CCP is Bane
"But but but... I gave you our secrets!"
"And you think this gives you power over me?
 
All for the low, low price of 40 million starved to death and a 10:1 casualty ratio, while receiving massive economic and military assistance from the world's other superpower

I don't like Mao or think he is a good guy or anything but it can't be denied that he achieved a massive amount especially early in his life. Going from a nearly feudal country to a Nuclear power in 50 years is a massive accomplishment.

It is China. A 10:1 Casualty Ratio are acceptable losses to them.
In war if it works and it doesn't cause your nation long term damage there are no stupid tactics.
Certainly the Chinese received massive material aid but they still managed to beat the US. Even if the Soviet Union provides aide that is still a massive accomplishment especially in that time period when the US could still fight wars.
I don't think you can reasonably pretend Mao didn't accomplish a lot.
 
I don't like Mao or think he is a good guy or anything but it can't be denied that he achieved a massive amount especially early in his life. Going from a nearly feudal country to a Nuclear power in 50 years is a massive accomplishment.

It is China. A 10:1 Casualty Ratio are acceptable losses to them.
In war if it works and it doesn't cause your nation long term damage there are no stupid tactics.
Certainly the Chinese received massive material aid but they still managed to beat the US. Even if the Soviet Union provides aide that is still a massive accomplishment especially in that time period when the US could still fight wars.
I don't think you can reasonably pretend Mao didn't accomplish a lot.
Mao personally ass fucked China 10-15 years into a industrial and scientific decline and a cultural genocide.

The Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution were RETARDED and killed MILLIONS and destroyed mainland Chinese culture (probably permanently) and ruined Chinese industry for 10+ years.

Dude had a brain being rotted away by siphillis
 
Purging costs.

It cost Hitler, it cost Stalin, it has cost Putin and it will cost Xi. It always does.
I reject this thesis. People who do actual Purges always die in bed. You pay a economic and military effectiveness cost but you gain complete and total control.

Hitler and Putin never really purged. Hitler killed like 200 SA people at most which is really not that much. He also was pretty repressive etc but none of his actions really constituted a purge in my opinion. Putin has hardly killed anyone.

Killing one or several of your political enemies does not constitute a Purge.
In fact I think that usually goes badly unless you a decently good reason to do so. Killing rivals in that manner raises the temperature for not very much gain.

A Purge is about killing every single one of the people who ever opposed you.
Actual Purges are extremely rare in history actually
and basically the most difficult thing to pull off and the number of people who have done it successfully is very small.

Mao personally ass fucked China 10-15 years into a industrial and scientific decline and a cultural genocide.

The Great Leap Forward and the Cultural Revolution were RETARDED and killed MILLIONS and destroyed mainland Chinese culture (probably permanently) and ruined Chinese industry for 10+ years.

Dude had a brain being rotted away by siphillis

Certainly correct which is one of those weird things about the guy. He ends China's century of humiliation and makes China into a nuclear power and later on starts causing massive amounts of destruction, misery and death with absolutely no benefit.

He did die in bed though (its an expression about a peaceful death)
 
Proof that communism doesn't work.... be it government cheese for the poor or a country of millions..... it always kills the drive for success since by the principles of the very ethos itself, why work when you are owed it? And if you're owed it, why not just take it? And if you're going to take it, why not take the best parts and take ALL of them for yourself? But if your stuff can be stolen just as easily as someone else's, why make anything good? And if you're not going to make anything good, why have competent workers?

Thus, China is built on a bedrock of 90% industrial espionage and 10% photoshop.

Government cheese worked, it inspired nearly everyone that ate it to work harder and get out of poverty.
 
How is everyone, here and otherwise, so sure that his purges aren't legitimate? Is it impossible Xi is actually cleaning up China considering how corrupt Chinese culture is?
I'm reluctant to ascribe positive motivation to an obvious dictator taking out his political enemies. It doesn't really make him any different from any other Chinese emperor, so the most I can say is he's not acting particularly strange.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: cactus and Coldgrip
I reject this thesis. People who do actual Purges always die in bed. You pay a economic and military effectiveness cost but you gain complete and total control.

Hitler and Putin never really purged. Hitler killed like 200 SA people at most which is really not that much. He also was pretty repressive etc but none of his actions really constituted a purge in my opinion. Putin has hardly killed anyone.

Killing one or several of your political enemies does not constitute a Purge.
In fact I think that usually goes badly unless you a decently good reason to do so. Killing rivals in that manner raises the temperature for not very much gain.

A Purge is about killing every single one of the people who ever opposed you.
Actual Purges are extremely rare in history actually
and basically the most difficult thing to pull off and the number of people who have done it successfully is very small.



Certainly correct which is one of those weird things about the guy. He ends China's century of humiliation and makes China into a nuclear power and later on starts causing massive amounts of destruction, misery and death with absolutely no benefit.

He did die in bed though (its an expression about a peaceful death)
Hitler never purged? Are you being serious?
 
Hitler never purged? Are you being serious?
If Hitler hadn't been a purging retard, Germany would have had a decent shot at getting the bomb before the US. Like a third of the Manhattan Project physicists were people who'd fled continental Europe before the war or early in the war because of the Nazis.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cactus
If Hitler hadn't been a purging retard, Germany would have had a decent shot at getting the bomb before the US. Like a third of the Manhattan Project physicists were people who'd fled continental Europe before the war or early in the war because of the Nazis.
The situation is less because of purges and more because National Socialism is a retarded ideology that could not manage the contradiction of "valuing personality" with social darwinism and at the same time wanting Germans to be atomized bug people similar to the "New Soviet Man"
 
Hitler never purged? Are you being serious?
This all gets into definition. I don't think it is useful to describe being repressive as "purging" but you can I guess. But, you need another word to describe the situation where everyone who ever opposes anything a political coalition does is killed or expelled from the state.
If Hitler hadn't been a purging retard, Germany would have had a decent shot at getting the bomb before the US. Like a third of the Manhattan Project physicists were people who'd fled continental Europe before the war or early in the war because of the Nazis.
I'd argue Ethnic Cleansing isn't a Purge. Otherwise any state that has ever done anything like ethnic cleansing has purged people.

I'd like to use words like Purge in a clear consistent way rather than for dramatic effect.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UERISIMILITUDO
This all gets into definition. I don't think it is useful to describe being repressive as "purging" but you can I guess. But, you need another word to describe the situation where everyone who ever opposes anything a political coalition does is killed or expelled from the state.

I'd argue Ethnic Cleansing isn't a Purge. Otherwise any state that has ever done anything like ethnic cleansing has purged people.

I'd like to use words like Purge in a clear consistent way rather than for dramatic effect.
The situation is less because of purges and more because National Socialism is a retarded ideology that could not manage the contradiction of "valuing personality" with social darwinism and at the same time wanting Germans to be atomized bug people similar to the "New Soviet Man"
The Nazi Party systematically purged Jews from professions like lawyering, banking (LOL), university appointments, industrial research, medical doctoring, any job requiring a post-graduate degree of any kind, in Germany well before September 1, 1939. It was a purge

Physicists:
Max Born
James Franck
Eugene Wigner
Leo Szilard
Edward Teller
John von Neumann
Hans Bethe
Niels Bohr
Lise Meitner (although she went to Sweden and did not participate in the Manhattan Project)
Theodore von Karmen
Albert Einstein
Joseph Rotblat
Otto Frisch
Emilio Segre
Enrico Fermi
Rudolph Peierls
Klaus Fuchs (although he was a filthy commie and a commie spy)

Some of them left Germany before 1933 because they saw the writing on the wall. Some left Germany after they were fired from their positions at German universities in the spring of 1933. Some like Rotblat fled other countries that Germany eventually invaded later on. Some like Segre and Fermi fled Italy as Mussolini started getting harder on Jews to suck up to Hitler. That is not an exhaustive list of the physicists that left continental Europe for Britain and America because of the Nazis either

Many other scientific fields also saw a huge brain drain from continental Europe to Britain and the USA. Biologists, chemists, every field imaginable. Hitler fucked Germany right up the poop chute with how many brilliant scientists Germany lost because of his Joo sperging
 
This all gets into definition. I don't think it is useful to describe being repressive as "purging" but you can I guess. But, you need another word to describe the situation where everyone who ever opposes anything a political coalition does is killed or expelled from the state.

I'd argue Ethnic Cleansing isn't a Purge. Otherwise any state that has ever done anything like ethnic cleansing has purged people.

I'd like to use words like Purge in a clear consistent way rather than for dramatic effect.
I think your use of the word is fairly singular and out of context with the majority use of the word.

Hitler most certainly
Purged. The word is
Perfect to describe a leader that has opponents or others who are obstacles murdered. And Hitler did oodles of it. That’s purging.
 
Back