- Joined
- Mar 4, 2019
Yep. I was just reading his thread in PG. What a cunt.Didn't watch, but I'm assuming he's Simon Whistler, he seems to be everywhere these days.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep. I was just reading his thread in PG. What a cunt.Didn't watch, but I'm assuming he's Simon Whistler, he seems to be everywhere these days.
Is this guy literally unaware that China has vociferously been increasing its defense spending for decades, saber rattling regarding Taiwan for longer, and engaging in a simmering boundary dispute in the South China Sea?
And what happened to Japan and the US there? It looks like you're describing a global trend. The one child policy should have been repealed in the 1980s to prevent the 90s and 20s collapse. But there seems to have been a structural collapse in both modernizing countries, with only the US opening its border to high fertility retard farmer populations from Latin America feeding the 90s baby boom and 20 year 2 per woman streak.Too true my friend
View attachment 5641049
Hong Kong is horror.At best they partook of the same jewish cum chalice as everyone else and failed to beat the global trend, and at worst it can be pointed out they are actually amongst the worst off, for instance there are only five countries in a worse situation according to wikipedia (apparently hong kong is down to 0.8 holy shit).
Usually there's a several decade lag time in between standard of living increase and birth rate decline
Yet Shanghai is going through housing crisis, infrastructure is going to shit and poverty
People packed too tightly into big cities + who needs kids when you have a career to make and Twitter, Facebook and Netflix?What is it about living in these societies that keeps birth rates low?
Chinese economy is in the shitter, housing is expensive, wages are cut and young people refuse to breed like rabbits for the regime like 7 kids per household like Putin told to Russians for example. Xi can't be that batshit and making pregnancy mandatory.Usually there's a several decade lag time in between standard of living increase and birth rate decline
Not in China though big thunk...
The real horseshoe theory is that birth rates decline at both ends, when times are good and when times are bad economically
The issue of developedcountries having a low birthrate is nothing new. This seems to be the natural order of things to an extent; when education and wealth increase, births decrease. We've seen this in Japan, South Korea, all of Europe, and the US (though in the last, its been offset by immigration). The problem with China is that it isn't a developed country, its a developing one. It doesn't have the high levels of wealth, developed economy, and welfare systems that the developed countries have. Most of its population are still poor peasants. China is growing old, before it grows rich, which is unique only to it, and will lead to a whole host of problems.And what happened to Japan and the US there? It looks like you're describing a global trend. The one child policy should have been repealed in the 1980s to prevent the 90s and 20s collapse. But there seems to have been a structural collapse in both modernizing countries, with only the US opening its border to high fertility retard farmer populations from Latin America feeding the 90s baby boom and 20 year 2 per woman streak.
I'm not trying to be contrarian, things are pretty fucking dire there, but this just looks like a trend that hit high IQ racial groups he modern age--the culture that both of them absorbed is American more than anything else--globalization was also a cultural Americanization for Japan and China, partial, but still profoundly impactful. It's not as if the lifting of the family planning policies lead to a baby boom--there was just no suppressed demand for the new policy to unlock. Maybe in the 80s? But by the time they had largely Americanized in attitudes to sex and marriage, it was too late, demand had been conditioned down by culture as much as policy. What is it about living in these societies that keeps birth rates low?
It isn't propaganda. This was reported in multiple news sources, and the officer purges are happening right now in real time. Its more likely than not that most, if not all, of this is true.
Seems like propaganda, but boy it would be really funny if missiles failed to launch cause the troops replaced the fuel with water...
But still, it would be interesting to see how they'll react if, and it's a big "if", their missiles failed to launch.It isn't propaganda. This was reported in multiple news sources, and the officer purges are happening right now in real time. Its more likely than not that most, if not all, of this is true.
Problem being China and Russia dipped birth rate below Japan and killing off quarter million of the population.The issue of developedcountries having a low birthrate is nothing new. This seems to be the natural order of things to an extent; when education and wealth increase, births decrease. We've seen this in Japan, South Korea, all of Europe, and the US (though in the last, its been offset by immigration). The problem with China is that it isn't a developed country, its a developing one. It doesn't have the high levels of wealth, developed economy, and welfare systems that the developed countries have. Most of its population are still poor peasants. China is growing old, before it grows rich, which is unique only to it, and will lead to a whole host of problems.
And that simply won't work for China in the long run. The Chinese people have gotten used to the comforts that have accrued to them via "capitalism with Chinese characteristics". They won't simply accept going back to life as it was in 1954 when everybody was a peasant, and neither will the party's leadership. Civil unrest is already a daily occurrence now and things will only get worse.Only solution is to instate 1984 police state, normalize poverty and war economy.
Xi ordered banks to limit deposits/withdrawals, state owned companies are forming militias.And that simply won't work for China in the long run. The Chinese people have gotten used to the comforts that have accrued to them via "capitalism with Chinese characteristics". They won't simply accept going back to life as it was in 1954 when everybody was a peasant, and neither will the party's leadership. Civil unrest is already a daily occurrence now and things will only get worse.