- Joined
- Feb 3, 2013
Wait, what? XDGFYS said:I just hope Chris really is as sterile, as Coleslaw is probably impotent
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wait, what? XDGFYS said:I just hope Chris really is as sterile, as Coleslaw is probably impotent
Well, Chris will do anything if you forced him to. But the point is that no one could. Not even the mother of his child would be capable of enforcing productive behavior on him all the time - a parent, by definition, has to be able to care for their child autonomously.Dreamatorium said:Say, what do you think would happen if Chris was placed in a hypothetical scenario where he was forced - absolutely forced - to be a productive parent?
The Knife said:GFYS said:There are many MANY paces around the world, where the status quo is much worse than living in a hoard with Christian Weston Chandler. You don't even need to leave the US. I know women who would would probably consider living with a mentally challenged repugnant worm like Chris, just for a roof over their head, a mattress to sleep on, and a blanket to crawl under as welcome respite from an abusive family member or partner. I'm not embellishing in the slightest. When you're hungry, tired, physically beaten, or emotionally broken enough, 14BC can seem like paradise - especially if Barb were no longer in the picture. Chris would be an easy mark to manipulate, and you could rule the roost. I just hope Chris really is as sterile, as Coleslaw is probably impotent, ending that branch of the Chandler curse. No child could survive his negligence and clumsiness for very long.Dynastia said:I don't know much about America's immigration policy, and I'm not sure how attractive a destination America has been since the economic downturn, but would a green-card marriage maybe be within the realm of possibility?
Move in, clean out the hoard, and resign yourself that the price of your new-found freedom is to be nanny to a perpetual manchild? I could actually see some desperate woman picking up that option.
What does that even mean????Children are most likely to channel-surf and turn on an adult program at any time; it is up to the parents to prevent those misunderstandings with caring discussions and supervision.
Dork Of Ages said:We all know how Chris won't have a kid. But, since this might qualify as a "What if?" thread, then I will say something.
He would be finacially unavailable for the child or wife. 800 dollars a month is not really enough to properly take care of a family long term.
The Knife said:Dork Of Ages said:We all know how Chris won't have a kid. But, since this might qualify as a "What if?" thread, then I will say something.
He would be finacially unavailable for the child or wife. 800 dollars a month is not really enough to properly take care of a family long term.
He would likely get an increase in benefits if he were caring for a child. And for that reason alone, I hope he never reads that sentence.
timtommy said:I agree that he would take a half-assed approach that would border on severe neglect. I think it would be interspersed with periods of intense smothering, and forcing age inappropriate activities on the child. He would be playing with legos and childish vidya with him/her long before and long after the child had any interest. There might be a period between the ages of 6 and 10 where they had common tastes, and if there was an attentive mother/nanny, the child might have a positive relationship with him.