Disclaimer: I only got through the first 40 minutes because I am at work and have to do my actual job at some point. That said this is really good for a high school project, it flows pretty well and is thoughtful and thorough.
Thoughts:
- I think you should introduce all of it more as a weird internet phenomenon; emphasize the odd fascination people have with him because that's what is going to draw Chris virgins in. Don't talk so much about how bizarre he is. Let people discover that for themselves, right now you're telling people what to think rather than showing them. The show don't tell mantra is applicable here. Phrases like "proving how gullible Chris can be..." And "remarkably bent genitals" (although that was funny) shouldn't really be in here, it's not objective and gives off the wrong vibe.
- You can cut the whole disclaimer at the beginning in future versions. I understand why you need to explain that you didn't have anything to do with bullying Chris to your high school teacher, but in an actual documentary nobody is going to assume anything about you or associate you personally with the content (unless it's a documentary strongly defined by the personality of its creator, such as Michael Moore).
- You can cut some of the pre-internet Christian stuff, especially the Songs of Christian video. It isn't that interesting without already having context. I understand the documentary is based on a timeline so I get why it was all thrown into the beginning but I think some of it could be woven into the later parts, some doesn't need to be told at all or can at the very least be summarized more briefly. Remember, hypothetically we aren't your audience. It's got to pull in people completely new to this.
- Too many sagas, it's confusing to the viewer. For instance: The "Adam Stackhouse" saga doesn't need to be separately defined, include it in the Megan saga. I'm tempted to say you should do away with arranging the documentary by saga entirely because they overlap too much and it's kind of confusing in the context of the chronological format.
- It's pronounced "E.D." Not "Ed" I'm pretty sure.
Other than that I pretty much agree with all of
@Hello Skinny 's points. It's a strong first draft and I hope I'm not being discouraging, this is just the editor in me.