Chris court appearance

Status
Not open for further replies.
You know, I'm actually a bit concerned that this is going to be what causes Chris to snap. Yes, he snaps daily, but I feel like he could actually harm himself this time. He's just not built for this. I don't see him making it even to September.

Does Chris have any history of self-harm, idealizing suicide, or suicide attempts? From my understanding he doesn't but Chris has such a well documented history I probably wouldn't know if he did.

Even if he does end up doing his time and getting out, he's going to be severely fucked up mentally. Yes, even more fucked up. I'm thinking padded cell or an asylum. I don't believe at all his conscious can handle losing all his toys and being in a cell 23 hours a day (he's going PC if not already).
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Agree
Reactions: hambeerlyingnreed, Sundae, RodgerDodger and 5 others
Any chance Chris will be found innocent? Not just "not guilty"...but innocent. You know, the new verdict that was invented specially for Michael Jackson when the Supreme Court saw how pure and childlike he was.

Also..lol at that fake court snap. That's not one of the real phone pics going around youtube. There's 2 -
crt1.jpg

crt2.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Dumb
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: blackboots, Apteryx Owenii, BigTubboWithLittleChina and 4 others
LinkinParkxNaruto[AMV] said:
He knows Chris is not going to female jail, he even admits so but still went on a if he did and framed the video with that angle. What a sleazy cunt
Click to expand...

Some of you autists are so focused on Chris-chan you don’t see the larger issues.

Yup, as Tucker Carlson said the decision was reversed, but and here’s the key part: Many other trannies are housed in female prisons.

He uses Chris-chan as a springboard to talk about a societal problem. That’s what journalists and commentators do.

What did you expect? Tucker Carlson to go into a ten minute long recap of the liquid Chris saga?
 
  • Like
  • Feels
  • Agree
Reactions: Donny Cheese, Dededon't, ToxicCatnip and 20 others
LordOdin said:
I personally can't call them evil as that would at least to me imply it's an intrinsic quality rather than a skewed moral compass. I'll just ask when we're talking evil do you mean to imply born evil or would that encompass as a result of nurture as well because? I could've misunderstood your point completely, if so my bad dude.
Click to expand...
Good and evil are instrinsic qualities. Morality isn't just a byproduct of evolution but a major driver of evolutionary processes in all social species, above all in humans where our natural environment is one formed almost exclusively by human action. Personality, the basis for all moral action, is heritable. Even when looking at really granular data such as political preference, a heritability of .4 has been observed.

Most people fall well within a range of normalcy where it doesn't make much sense to split hairs over the adaptive value of for example adding an inch to your dating profile but every so often you get people that stand out, far beyond the scope of ordinary human interaction. This is where you find Barb who would threaten suicide if any element of her precious hoard was disturbed and her even worse off son who was beyond help from the moment he was born.
 
  • Like
Reactions: blackboots, hambeerlyingnreed and TemeculanZardo
Czechem Republic said:
Journalist's jobs are to neutrally deliver information, not pontificate about societal problems. Carlson is no journalist.
Click to expand...

Maybe if you hadn’t cut off my post mid sentence in order to try and push a claim I never made, you might have noticed that I wrote “journalists and commentators”, and Carlson is definetely for the most part the latter.

Of course, going by your definition of journalism there is either no real journalism left, except for in small, local papers.

(Or Tucker Carlson is every bit as much a journalist as anyone from CNN or NYT, since most of what they do is likewise to pontificate on societal issues and push narratives.)
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: Donny Cheese, BScCollateral, Cherenkovblue and 14 others
David L. Heilberg said:
Like he’s gonna live to 60
Click to expand...
I wouldn't be so sure. Bob and Barb at their senior years were living almost the same life that he was, - eating junkfood, living in filth and have next to none physical activity. Before that they were smoking and drinking, if I recall correctly. Bob died at the age of 84 and Barb is about to turn 80. Chris has all the chances to pollute this world for longer than he deserves.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: hambeerlyingnreed, DicksOutForChauvin, Barley and 5 others
LordOdin said:
Empathy may not be the right word to use i don't mean to imply he's a complete soulless sociopath. I'll admit it's a bit more difficult to explain in english. I meant to imply that due to missing the social cues given by non verbal communication chris his only end resort is "what bothers me?". So the vieuws everything from a personal lense the flipside of that is when he wants something that makes someone uncomfortable he'll miss it. I still kind of feel like im missing my own point this would be easier in dutch. As for the big 5 agreeableness isn't the only one that's affected by his retardation and how he was raised let's be real here. Lastly i personally can't call them evil as that would at least to me imply it's an intrinsic quality rather than a skewed moral compass. I'll just ask when we're talking evil do you mean to imply born evil or would that encompass as a result of nurture as well because? I could've misunderstood your point completely, if so my bad dude.

Edit cause i fucked up due to mobile being fucky
Click to expand...

Chris as a soulless sociopath. Hmm... Can anyone think of a time when Chris did something genuinely nice for anyone, without getting anything in return, and without it being somehow troll-induced.

I really can’t. He has also demonstrated a solid ability to alienate people and little need for actual friendship.

Going by empathy alone, I’d definitely classify Chris as close to a sociopath.

(Even though he lacks other well known aspects of psychopathy/sociopathy: Particularly a lack of fear.)

Ultimately both things can be true: Chris has zero empathy and Barb made her own bed, by not just having a deeply inappropriate relationship with him, but also by feeding the worst part of his character with her own behavior.

Hmmpf! said:
Some random bumfucks in Bulgaria gets the Chris situation more right than most of the Twitter Troons and the blue checkmarks.

Fucking amazing.
Click to expand...

Eastern Europe used to mean poverty and backwardness. These days it’s increasingly ground zero for common fucking sense. That and a booming porn industry.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Gary spivey, make_it_so, Abarefiller and 12 others
Fapcop said:
Can anyone think of a time when Chris did something genuinely nice for anyone, without getting anything in return, and without it being somehow troll-induced.
Click to expand...
Eh, I am not a christorian, but not really. Even some time after Bob's death he admitted that it was better when Bob had to file tax papers.

I keep seeing people mentioning that Chris asked Null to kill someone, it that true? I mean, Chris is not beyond that, he wanted Mimms girlfriend to get killed or beaten, because "Mimms made me alone and he deserves to be alone".
 
  • Like
Reactions: blackboots
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back