Containment Chris in the Media - Mentions of Chris in different medias

[Lockethebard]

What kotkau really needs to adress is that you need to be careful on the internet. You cant just give out your recipe for navy popsicles and orange cream soda and not expect people to call you out on it.

 

[Rogowski]

And the legend of Gawker's shitty journalism lives on.

 

[The Fifth Waltz]

Fucking hell I can't believe Kotaku is still up. If you're going to write an article on Autism and Chris PLEASE RECONSIDER.

 

[thismanlies]

The author acts like she didn't read about Chris wiping out da homos in issue 10.

 

[Aldora]

This is what happens when the mainstream tries to write about Chris. Lol.

 

[Super Collie]

Is this shitty rag supposed to be about video games? Why are they running article about how saying "that's autistic" is bad?

 

[Quijibo69]

Chris should raise the price of the shirt after this.

 

[Malt Liquor]

Is this shitty rag supposed to be about video games? Why are they running article about how saying "that's autistic" is bad?

Cuz it's a Social Justice rag,and anything is good to push the narrative

 

[Drawets Rednaxela]

The trolling isn't so much a campaign as it is normal people reacting in appropriate disgust to Chris stalking beloved children's TV voice actors and announcing his dreams of fucking Barb.

 

[JULAY]

Lol, an SJW is using Chris to illustrate another nonsensical point about how calling people names on the internet makes you basically Hitler.

 

[Wraith]

Freaking Gawker / Kotaku. Not even once.
I don't fault OP for making this thread. Having someone in the faux media mentioning the abomination of the devil's imagination is a note worthy thing, but everyone that worked and currently works in the old Gawker franchise are some of the most sleazy, SJW, scum bucket sacks of crap in the industry.

As a comparison, I really don't like CWC. It's damn near personal for me. However, when trolls like Clyde Cash and Vivian Gee tried to help him fix his life, even through trolling, I wasn't against that. No, I was full on board with that. If Chris had turned his life around and made progress with his life I would have considered that a good end to this bizarre story. (Another reason why I'm still a little shell shocked after being gone for a number of years and finding things have fallen apart as it has and still continues to.)
Yet, to have some of the most morally poverty-stricken people trying to use Chris for their own ends, and to begin to pretty much make excuses for his behavior and refuse to investigate his act to see if he's a horse worth backing... that's a paddlin'. Them trying to make money off of the article... that's also a paddlin'.

I'm disgusted by this, and surprised Kotaku still exists on top of it.

 

[Slowinthemind]

Of course it would be written by a woman, she needs to hang around him and be groped for a while and see if she changes her opinion of him.

 

[Raiken]

And I thought they would improve getting saved by getting ripped out of gawker.

Not even by a long shot.

 

[Philosophy Phil]

Let's write and article about autism and the transgender by using a person who is highly despised in the autistic community for being a negative representation, and who is not actually transgendered, but is attempting to lure women in by disguising himself as a female and calling himself a lesbian ala sexual predator style.

Chris is just taking advantage of the transgender community for his own selfish wants, although his personal failures keep him from ever truly succeeding. It would be like a pedophile pretending to identify as a Parent, carrying around a baby doll to further this, just to get close to the children of other Parents. That person is trying to take advantage of the Parenting Community by saying "Look! I'm genuinely like you!" while still being selfish and perverse in his goals.

Write about who you want, but defending Chris Chandler, "Someone who has, Frozen Semen, Eaten own Semen, Self Video Taped having sex with a blow up doll, and many many other things of his own volition" just goes to show that you don't know jack about Chris, and are looking for click views. Of course, it's Kotaku, so why would you expect anything but poorly written bait articles?

Not everyone with autism is a fucking hero, not everyone who identifies as lesbian, gay, bi, transgender is a shining example to the community. Chris is the bottom of the barrel of both communities, while being an insult to the LGBT one by being a straight man who dresses up as a woman to have sex with other women. That's not being transgendered, that's sexual predation.

 

[Anchuent Christory]

View attachment 208279

"It's hard to find decent information about them"

What the fuck? There are A-list celebrities pursued by paparazzi with less publicly known and meticulously curated information about them than Chris.

 

[Pointless Pedant]

Freaking Gawker / Kotaku. Not even once.
I don't fault OP for making this thread. Having someone in the faux media mentioning the abomination of the devil's imagination is a note worthy thing, but everyone that worked and currently works in the old Gawker franchise are some of the most sleazy, SJW, scum bucket sacks of crap in the industry.

As a comparison, I really don't like CWC. It's damn near personal for me. However, when trolls like Clyde Cash and Vivian Gee tried to help him fix his life, even through trolling, I wasn't against that. No, I was full on board with that. If Chris had turned his life around and made progress with his life I would have considered that a good end to this bizarre story. (Another reason why I'm still a little shell shocked after being gone for a number of years and finding things have fallen apart as it has and still continues to.)
Yet, to have some of the most morally poverty-stricken people trying to use Chris for their own ends, and to begin to pretty much make excuses for his behavior and refuse to investigate his act to see if he's a horse worth backing... that's a paddlin'. Them trying to make money off of the article... that's also a paddlin'.

I'm disgusted by this, and surprised Kotaku still exists on top of it.

"Vivian" was actually Clyde. He started trying to help Chris, but Chris was so utterly exceptional and annoying that he lost his patience and started trolling him instead.

 

[AnOminous]

If your entire article claiming "autistic" as a slur is bad, picking Chris as your example is shooting yourself in the dick. Because if there's any reason for "autistic" to be an insult, Chris is it.

 

[Microlab]

Oh yes, gloss over how "her" biggest initial claim to fame was sexually harassing and nonconsensually creating porn of his actually, natally female best friend, Megan.

Just ignore the bad parts! That kind of thing would imply that people who claim to be trannies could actually be horrible people, and sometimes infamy is deservedly gain, and that's not very PC, now is it? Nooo, beautiful, sweet lady Christine is just a poor, putupon soul, wrongfully stalked despite her best efforts.

...And she's descended from Anne Bolyne, you know!

"It's hard to find decent information about them"

What the fuck? There are A-list celebrities pursued by paparazzi with less publicly known and meticulously curated information about them than Chris

I think by "decent information", they mean glowing, asspatty, safe for Social Justice sources, not a STALKING AND HARRASSMENT SITE by DANG, DIRTY TROLLS that readily calls out how bullshite Chris's entire life is at every opportunity.

 

[Duke Nukem]

If your entire article claiming "autistic" as a slur is bad, picking Chris as your example is shooting yourself in the dick. Because if there's any reason for "autistic" to be an insult, Chris is it.

Just because of this article, I'm going to use "autistic" as an insult more than ever before.

 

[Internet War Criminal]

Article
http://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2017/0...e-feminism-is-even-more-annoying-from-a-male/
http://archive.is/Yc7EF

Comments call him a cross dresser and a shemale.

Eid yhctiwt eid!