Chris misgendering spergout - Tranny cope and seethe

Which platform has yielded the worst responses?


  • Total voters
    2,459
i eat lots of fish and wine. i run a gyro shop that inexplicably sells pasta. the usual

(transmed is the belief that being trans is a medical condition and you are only an actual trans person if you go down the correct avenues of diagnosis and treatment)
Imo, the only legitimate "Trans" person is those who have ACTUAL gender dysphoria not the made up "respect my non-binary pronouns" crap.
 
I think trannies actually believe the support they get isn't conditional, but really, theyre not accepted, people just tolerate them. If enough of them fucks up bad enough to the point that everyone can't ignore them, they'll be treated like every other major mental disorder and thrown into one of those shit covered asylums. Like they should already be.
 
Irregardless of your personal beliefs, Chris openly admitted to using troonery to try to get laid. He literally co-opted gender dysphoria to wet his dick. You'd expect there would be a lot more outrage and condemnation but nope, because then they'd need to take a close look at every single one of those mental illness faking "lookit me" douchebags that have singlehandedly bombed psychiatry back to the stone age.

Did you know theres a burgeoning community of youtubers who claim to have MPD? Maybe one percent of the whole crowd of cringetards is actually suffering from a debilitating disease while the rest are vegan 20 year olds roleplaying being an interesting person for a change.

Yes I think that would be blatantly obvious to anyone who has followed Chris for any amount of time.

The fact that there is a wing of the trans movement that is essentially failed neckbeards thinking it will get them sex, isn't anything new. I know people personally who essentially fit into this archetype as a T, which is why I don't recognise them as trans. (I'm that asshole, who will not bend the knee.)

To be fair though I've got no problem with transexuals who aren't part of the Twitter-brigade. Like the majority of people I know, it's a live and let live situation that permeates my philosophy towards these people. I treat them with the same amount of respect due to anyone in society. While I might not agree with their personal choices, it is best to try and allow them to live their lives. But that is just it, the majority of the transmafia aren't interested in equality, they are interested in agendas and as a result have done some serious societal harm as a result. The fact that the neckbeards are along for the ride, doesn't change that.

I'm not suprised to be honest, there has always been a place for medical malingerers, but clearly there has been a shift in society that rewards and coddles those who fall into special categories. There seems to be a current subwaves of philosophy that it's not your character in the face of adversity as a person that defines you, but just the adversity real or imagined. (You see this with kids now coming up with all sorts of mental illnesses, or gender fluidity, much in the same way the goths and emo kids were "special and unique" 20 years ago.)
 
Rate me autistic or w/e, but I don't get it. I just don't get it. I don't understand why Twittards want to overlook this heinous and reprehensible crime to defend how Chris wants to be referred to. I don't get this argument that you have to respect a person's pronouns or whatever. Besides the fact that Chris being transgender is pretty bullshit (for several reasons), the overarching issue here is that respect is a thing that's earned. It's not a fucking right, you have to work for it. If you're genuinely trans and you work to prove that to me, I will respect you (and I mean legitimate trans, not any made-up genders or neopronouns or whatever else). Chris never worked to actually prove he's transgender other than some half-assed things. Even if he had actively made an effort, he'd have lost that privilege of being respected when he raped his fucking mother. I just don't understand why Twitter is overlooking this to cry about "muh transphobia" over A). a guy whose "transness" was questionable to begin with, and B). who committed a horrible crime that nullifies any respect he may have deserved.

Sorry, that was long and disjointed and autistic. I'll take my puzzle pieces/hats/trash cans now.
 
the radfems at Ovarit are enjoying the cope and seethe too

ovaritchrischan.png

screen in the original post is censored, here's a better one:

ovarittweet.png

and a based meme from ovarit

chrischanovarit.png
 
You hear people constantly say that Chris "isn't a real trans woman" and "he isn't a good representative of the trans community because *so-and-so that happened years ago*" all the time or at least they did.

No idea if it changed but I find this weirdly interesting because of that drastic change.
 
I think it’s interesting how media outlets are describing Chris.

“Comic creator”

“YouTuber”

I’ve even seen “blogger” a handful of times.

I know they’re struggling to put Chris in context for normies but “comic creator” doesn’t even begin to describe who he is or why we’re talking about Chris. “Internet icon” is the closest to an appropriate title that I’ve seen but even that comes off as misleading. It’s a shame the mainstream media doesn’t have the balls to title their shit “Retarded Troon Fucks Up”
If he wasn't pretending to be a woman they would 100% have headlines like "Disturbed Man" "Mentally Ill Internet Celebrity" etc.
 
The crucial thing that gets missed is, no matter where you lie on the trans issue, (TERF, truscum, etc), Chris engaged in MASCULINE violence. He committed violence with his penis, he raped someone with his penis. There should be no supporting of his identity if, even though he says he's a woman, he committed violence in a way that only MEN can.

Sure, women can rape, but women do not have penises with which to rape. Transwomen do, but if a transwoman rapes someone using a part of their biology they nominally do not want to have, that shows that they're lying to everyone, and are unquestionably a man.

Chris is a man and will never be a woman because at the end of the day he, and as other internet transwoman predators have done, has used his sexual anatomy as a weapon while using gender games as a smokescreen.

These Tiktok kiddos are willful dupes for these predators and are going to have a rude awakening once they graduate high school.
 
He committed violence with his penis, he raped someone with his penis. There should be no supporting of his identity if, even though he says he's a woman, he committed violence in a way that only MEN can.
Troons insist on everyone calling these freaks "women" instead of something descriptive like "penis-wielding rapists." By referring to them as female, it might disguise the reality to a few normies, because they're not going to picture a violent fat freak with a penis.
 
Troons insist on everyone calling these freaks "women" instead of something descriptive like "penis-wielding rapists." By referring to them as female, it might disguise the reality to a few normies, because they're not going to picture a violent fat freak with a penis.
A disguise as deceptive as a pair of glasses and a fake mustache. A kid could see through that bullshit. Hell, someone with downs could probably do it.
 
A disguise as deceptive as a pair of glasses and a fake mustache. A kid could see through that bullshit. Hell, someone with downs could probably do it.
Even when "allies" insist on pronouns, it's very much half-hearted. They know deep down it's a man who's doing the raping, not his "female identity."

They just avoid calling these sickos men so as to not remind the rest of the troons that their penises are the reason why women ("TERFs") fear having them around.
 
Back