🐱 Chris Pratt’s ‘The Terminal List’ Is a Deranged Right-Wing Revenge Fantasy

CatParty


The Terminal List features Chris Pratt going vengefully homicidal due, in part, to a serious mental condition in Amazon’s latest, which follows in the tradition of Jack Ryan and Jack Reacher by delivering gung-ho macho action-drama tailor-made for fortysomething Call of Duty players. Still, if this adaptation of Jack Carr’s novel mostly fits itself into a particular dad-entertainment streaming niche, it also, to a large extent, comes off as a wet dream for militia-minded anti-establishment kooks, replete with a deranged Pratt performance as a Navy SEAL who responds to injustice by murdering the guilty with extremely wackadoo prejudice.

Given its suggestion that slaughtering your powers-that-be enemies for a righteous revenge cause is totally OK and very cool, the morality of showrunner David DiGilio and executive producer/director Antoine Fuqua’s eight-part series (July 1) is, let’s say, lacking. There’s some serious lunacy to The Terminal List, courtesy of its excessive take on the military-conspiracy genre and its headliner’s turn as an impaired war hero running amok as a shoot-first, ask-questions-never vigilante. As recently confirmed by Jurassic World Dominion, Pratt’s stolid leading-man routine is usually his least interesting mode of operation; the actor’s best work (Parks and Rec, Guardians of the Galaxy) undercuts any pretenses of He-Man ruggedness with goofy, self-effacing humor. There’s none of that here, and yet the single-mindedness of his character, and the material, is so fanatical that it often tips everything into insanity, sporadically warping an otherwise straightforward payback narrative into something dark and disturbing.

Set primarily in Coronado, California, but pandering to male red-state viewers with routine references to beer, guns, country music, and hunting, The Terminal List stars Pratt as James Reece, a decorated Navy SEAL who embarks on a mission in Syria to capture a chemical-weapons baddie that culminates with an ambush, resulting in the death of his entire squad. Reece returns stateside with a horrible concussion and an apparently faulty recollection of these catastrophic events and the subsequent suicide of a close platoonmate. He becomes immediately convinced that someone is altering the record in order to cover something up, the problem being that his migraines and incessant conflation of various memories (seen in swirling flashbacks) are so rampant that he can’t trust his own thoughts. Nonetheless, he decides that his recent undertaking was a trap orchestrated by nefarious forces who fed him bad intel and begins investigating what really happened with the aid of his close buddy, shaggy boozehound CIA spook Ben Edwards (Taylor Kitsch).

[Spoilers Follow]

The Terminal List’s early going concentrates on the question of whether Reece is losing his marbles or onto a covert scheme. The latter notion soon draws him to investigative reporter Katie Buranek (Constance Wu), who wants him to speak on the record about his men’s tragic demises. By the conclusion of its first installment, though, DiGilio’s series definitively reveals that Reece isn’t simply imagining things. During a routine MRI scan to check out his wonky brain, Reece is assailed by two masked gunmen. He then goes home to find his wife Lauren (Riley Keough, in a painfully thankless role) and daughter Lucy (Arlo Mertz) assassinated in the kitchen. The sole conclusion one can draw from this is that someone is trying to eliminate Reece as a means of protecting a very important secret, and Reece consequently tries to clear his name in his family’s murders (since, as an unstable killing machine, he’s the obvious prime suspect) and searching for the perpetrators behind these attacks, leading to revelations concerning, among others, Navy bigwig Lorraine Hartley (Jeanne Tripplehorn) and corporate titan Steve Horn (Jai Courtney).

Hewing to a tired Tom Clancy-ish formula, The Terminal List generally feels like numerous generic potboilers targeted at men who dream of taking up furious arms against a system that preys upon both the innocent and the servicemen and women who risk their lives to protect it. Fuqua and the rest of the series’ directors shoot everything in darkness and blandly colorless hues, and the scripts are a compendium of clichés, all military jargon and rah-rah platitudes. The cloak-and-dagger aspects of this adventure are pedestrian by any standard, and the initial attempts to cast Reece as an unhinged vet who’s concocting make-believe conspiracies to soothe his addled conscience are feeble and help distend a story that—as later becomes even more evident—could have been concisely handled in a two-hour movie.

“Hewing to a tired Tom Clancy-ish formula, ‘The Terminal List’ generally feels like numerous generic potboilers targeted at men who dream of taking up furious arms against a system that preys upon both the innocent and the servicemen and women who risk their lives to protect it.”

The Terminal List wildly overstays its welcome and provides few moments of memorable excitement. Yet its one uniquely prickly element is Pratt’s Reece, a hardened warrior who has no qualms about fatally felling his enemies and goes about repeatedly proving that during every violent showdown. Reece’s methodical viciousness is so over-the-top and uncomplicated by considerations of right and wrong that the series serves as a celebration of whatever-it-takes brutality carried out by an individual who’s appointed himself judge, jury, and executioner. Pratt’s protagonist is a modern-day Rambo, and while that means there’s little suspense to the proceedings—we know Reece is correct about his suspicions, and that his enemies are villains who deserve their fates—his lack of inhibition makes him more than just a cardboard cut-out Navy SEAL, allowing Pratt to tap into a strain of bloodthirsty psychosis that’s far removed from his typical good-guy schtick.

The Terminal List’s decision to posit Reece’s reign of terror as virtuous is ultimately its defining characteristic, affording a window onto a conservative-America mindset that views the government as inherently corrupt (and anti-soldier), and lone-wolf military men as the only figures capable of making the world a more honorable place. “I am justice,” pronounces Reece toward the end of his Modern Warfare-style rampage, and the lasting impression left by his odyssey is that it’s been crafted to appeal to a target demographic that relishes the idea of grabbing a machine gun, sniper rifle, and battle axe and overthrowing the crooked status quo and its shadowy, profiteering leaders. There’s no arguing that such a tack has been taken countless times before, but in our current domestic sociopolitical climate, one’s tolerance for such rebellious fantasies may vary.
 
I love all the whining and pearl clutching from the same stripe of faggot who screams "BURN IT ALL DOWN!" when they don't get what they want.

Notice, anti-government isn't OK for the Navy SEAL, but anti-government is OK for the soycuck faggot who couldn't exist without it.

God, I hate these people so much.

The author doesn't know that their condescending and scathing tone also told me what they think about people like me.
 
The only times the left has flipped out about a movie and been right was Atlas Shrugged. That thing sucked! But generally if they flip out about it, especially if it has Chris Pratt? It's worth your time/money.
As some one who vaguely likes atlas shrugged i cant imagine any movie adaption being any good
 
Thanks for the heads up A&N, I was looking for something summery action-y to break up the monotony.

The only times the left has flipped out about a movie and been right was Atlas Shrugged. That thing sucked! But generally if they flip out about it, especially if it has Chris Pratt? It's worth your time/money.
On re-watch the first two films were fun, competently shot and decently acted, the third one was terrible, but it's the best that could have been done with the source material.
 
... who responds to injustice by murdering the guilty with extremely wackadoo prejudice.
It's called righteous fury and justice, faggot.

Given its suggestion that slaughtering your powers-that-be enemies for a righteous revenge cause is totally OK and very cool,
You get setup and all your friends die, don't do anything, just accept it.

The Terminal List’s decision to posit Reece’s reign of terror as virtuous is ultimately its defining characteristic, affording a window onto a conservative-America mindset that views the government as inherently corrupt (and anti-soldier), and lone-wolf military men as the only figures capable of making the world a more honorable place.
Hmm, yes, very interesting. Now can you please tell me your views on Restorative Justice, BLM, The Summer of Love, and defunding the police?
 
They held back on the destruction of Chris Pratt for so long. I guess now that the Guardians of the Galaxy brand franchise is far enough past, he can die.
Guardians of the Galaxy 3 is coming out some time next year and is Disney's only chance at making any money at the moment.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: TheDarknessGrows
If they're going to compare it to Reacher, I'll watch it.

Reacher has been the only Amazon produced thing I've enjoyed that I can remember.

Edit: Didn't Michael B. Jordan also star in some Tom Clancy revenge series? I don't remember people bitching about that but I guess these people just think a nogs gonna nog.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: JJLiautaud
Edit: Didn't Michael B. Jordan also star in some Tom Clancy revenge series? I don't remember people bitching about that but I guess these people just think a nogs gonna nog.
Wasn't that one John Clark's origin story (forget the name sadly)? I don't think anyone talked about it other than "Black lead!" and it ultimately wound up being terrible and forgettable.
 
If they're going to compare it to Reacher, I'll watch it.

Reacher has been the only Amazon produced thing I've enjoyed that I can remember.
Reacher was great and I'm hyped for this.

Pieces like this can only function as publicity as nobody who agrees w/ the tone of the article was going to watch it in the first place and it fluffs the Chuds who were likely to otherwise miss the typical promotional channels.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: CircuSphere
This is way too much seethe and cope for what indeed just sounds like a generic send-up of Clancy thrillers and Rambo/Punisher/Jack Reacher style schlock. If chimping out at the very mention of Chris Pratt wasn't a soylib staple you could've fooled me this was some subtle attempt at guerilla marketing.
 
Hadn't even heard of it, will check it out tomorrow.

Thanks, you miserable humorless shrew.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bungdit Din
Sounds like I'm gonna wish Amazon had used these people to do the Wheel of Time instead of the faggot (both literally and metaphorically) they put in charge of that abomination.

edit: I read the book. The Punisher isn't a bad comparison, but the villains weren't the mob, it was Big Pharma and Big Gubbmint. Very silly. Especially since the whole "Terminal" thing turned out to be, LOL, not really.


BTW, If the Usual Suspects REALLY want to get their knickers in a twist, they should probably be sperging out about the upcoming The Grey Man adaptation on Netflix. Assuming the adaptation stays true to the book, the second half of which was playing John Wick with the "Die, Foreigner, Die" mod installed, they'd go bananas. White man killing Koreans, Africans, South Americans, Arabs, etc.

I guess Chris Pratt needs to be cancelled while Ryan Gosling doesn't, at least not quite yet.

I made the mistake of reading one book while listening to the other on audio. The two are hopelessly jumbled in my mind at this point.
 
Last edited:
Back