- Joined
- Jun 14, 2024
lol what? What sort of insane logic is this?His discussion with Gavin Ortlund and his debate with Matthew Everhard might be good starting places if you want to understand him more, basically his whole movement is focused on the idea that it's never okay to voluntarily leave a church no matter how degenerate/leftist/heretical ect ect it gets cause leaving would be "cowardice" it's better to be in the gorgeous church with the atheist progressive woman pastor so you can gamble on eventually controlling that pretty building rather than taking shelter somewhere primitive like holding church in a field in the woods with people who hold to the Apostolic Faith.
So if we were in the Fourth century and his church decided to embrace Arianism (something based off the cold takes you mentioned earlier I assume he must disagree with), he’d advocate staying with that church rather than leaving their heretical asses? Or does he draw the line somewhere?
If that really reflects his logic, that’s very stupid. And contradicts the example of pretty much all the church fathers I can think of.