Culture College student kicked out of class for telling professor there are only two genders

Status
Not open for further replies.
https://archive.fo/1y5DK

A religious studies major was barred from Christianity class at Indiana University of Pennsylvania for saying during class that there are only two genders.

Lake Ingle, a senior at the university, said he was silenced and punished by IUP Professor Alison Downie for questioning her during a Feb. 28 “Christianity 481: Self, Sin, and Salvation” lecture.

After showing a 15-minute TED Talk by transgender ex-pastor Paula Stone Williams discussing the “reality” of “mansplaining,” “sexism from men,” and “male privilege,” the professor asked the women in the class to share their thoughts. When no women in the class said anything, Ingle spoke up, challenging the professor on biology and the gender wage gap.

He told the class that the official view of biologists is that there are only two genders.

The feminist professor booted him from class and asked him not to come back. She referred him to the public university’s Academic Integrity Board (AIB). Ingle needs to complete the class to graduate at the end of the semester.

“You are barred from attending this class in accordance with the Classroom Disruption policy,” IUP Provost Timothy Moerland told Ingle in a March 2 letter.

Ingle said what the professor did was unconstitutional.

“My professor is violating my First Amendment rights because of the fact that my views and ideology is different from hers,” Ingle told Fox News. “So she took it on herself to silence and embarrass me – bully me – for speaking up in class.”

Downie accused the conservative libertarian student of “disrespectful objection,” “refusal to stop talking out of turn,” “angry outbursts in response to being required to listen to a trans speaker discuss the reality of white male privilege and sexism,” and “disrespectful references to the validity of trans identity and experience.”

Ingle doesn’t see this as a transgender, women’s rights, or wage issue, but rather as free speech and an example of the constant misuse of intellectual power at universities.

“It is my firmest belief that every human being has the freedom and right to identify, dress, and represent oneself as they see fit,” Ingle said. “I think this is all an attempt to silence my views personally because they contradict the ones she pushes in class so evidently.”

Ingle objected to Downie’s “overall abuse” as a professor “indoctrinating” students because she won’t listen to the other side of a controversial argument.

“You can’t say that anecdotal evidence is fact,” Ingle said. “My professor pretty much just tried to shut me up because she was just letting women speak. I brought up the fact that biologists don’t agree that there’s more than two genders and I said the wage gap she’s referring to – 77 cents on the dollar – that even the New York Times debunked that.”

Downie and Ingle had an AIB hearing Friday, with a ruling set for March 19.

If the board rules against Ingle, he won’t graduate in May. Regardless, he plans on someday becoming a professor.

“When you see that kind of misuse of intellectual power, you want to be the person that comes back and does it responsibly and with morals,” Ingle said. “Instead of being the purveyor of your ideology, you can be an educator.”

The university was unable to comment due to student education records, and Downie did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
 
Well her Rate My Professors page is busy, and even has a few white knights.
View attachment 401685

Funny how Downie warns that her course might be difficult for the easily offended but here she ended up getting triggered herself.

I had to take a "Classroom Equity and Diversity" course my final year of college. The professor pushed the whole "trigger warning" policy down our throats. The repercussions of saying anything mildly against the SJW narrative was to be asked to leave the room, and probably have a talk with the dean. This class infuriated me to no end. I came close myself to being removed after I challenged her idea that "down syndrome" should be renamed "Prince Charming syndrome" and that "foreigner" was a microagression and should instead be called "internationals". So, I can 100 percent believe this kid simply made a statement and this exceptional individual professer was so triggered she thought she was literally being raped and claimed he was having an "outburst".

I'm glad I went to college pre-SJW where they flat out told you this was college and you were an adult. Mommy wasn't here to take care of you and it was pretty much too bad if something offended you. Because if you couldn't handle it then you didn't belong in college. Now it's apparently the other way around and adult students need surrogate wet nurses to comfort them when someone dares to challenge the narrative. Everyone else is a bully that needs to be punished.

Prince Charming Syndrome already exists though. It's when a woman is holding out for an impossible mate. You possess an inflexible fairy tale version of what love is and keep trying to find your Disney prince to no avail because he doesn't exist in reality.

Foreigner is a microaggression?:lol:

No matter what it will always eventually come to a point where the new word becomes offensive because it isn't inclusive enough. So you have to keep changing things and everyone is terrified of their own language because they don't want to trigger anyone. We don't need Big Brother to force Newspeak on us. We're perfectly capable of installing it ourselves.

newspeak-1.jpg


What will they REEEEEE about when there are no words left offensive enough to REEEEEE over?
 
Honestly this is a great example of why you just sit down, keep quiet, do the course work and get out with a good grade. You can rate the professor negatively afterward on RMP and spread the word, but college is too expensive and time consuming to risk fucking it up by turning the class into a battleground just because the professor is making you listen to some stupid shit.

Obviously this is not ideal; professors should encourage discussion and differing ideas (and I think there are still quite a few of them out there, and thank goodness for that). But I think when you realize there is nothing to be gained from arguing with a professor other than you getting punished, you need to recognize that you are in an extremely disadvantageous position and back down, and above all keep the situation from escalating into something that can hurt your chance at graduating. Its shitty, but that's how the system is set up, unfortunately.

Its amusing that this class is about privilege, though, because college professors have so much power to fuck over students that it isn't even funny. She should recognize her own privilege of not being at risk of getting punished for choosing to participate in class.
Lindsay Shepherd leaked her hearing with the school and they were all forced to apologize. There's lots of different ways to deal with stupidity.
 
What.

Imagine a doctor approaching a new parent and telling them: '' Congratulations! Your boy is a prince charming!'' Que the crushing disappointment.
I've always wanted to go the opposite direction and rename maple syrup urine disease something scarier
Pretty sure Fingerpainting is an actual learning experience, they don't equate.
Realizing that sometimes it is everyone else who is wrong, even an authority figure, is a powerful learning experience. Too bad only a minority learn that from hearing idiot professors blather on about post modernism. They could repackage the course as a study in political propaganda...
Maybe in the past that was true.
There are so many stupid classes needed for any major, why not have a softball course in critical thinking? Shit, that should be a requirement for high school graduation actually, they're capable of it.
 
I had to take a "Classroom Equity and Diversity" course my final year of college. The professor pushed the whole "trigger warning" policy down our throats. The repercussions of saying anything mildly against the SJW narrative was to be asked to leave the room, and probably have a talk with the dean. This class infuriated me to no end. I came close myself to being removed after I challenged her idea that "down syndrome" should be renamed "Prince Charming syndrome" and that "foreigner" was a microagression and should instead be called "internationals". So, I can 100 percent believe this kid simply made a statement and this exceptional individual professer was so triggered she thought she was literally being raped and claimed he was having an "outburst".
I had a similar experience at a conference. We were taught that the term refugee was offensive because once the person comes to Canada they are no longer fleeing. She said all migrants and refugees should be called New Canadians. I think the term refugee is useful and unoffensive because it describes a specific reason why someone would come to another country.
 
What.

Imagine a doctor approaching a new parent and telling them: '' Congratulations! Your boy is a prince charming!'' Que the crushing disappointment.

I guarantee that professor didn't even ask any actual Down Syndrome people if they agreed with her.

I had a similar experience at a conference. We were taught that the term refugee was offensive because once the person comes to Canada they are no longer fleeing. She said all migrants and refugees should be called New Canadians. I think the term refugee is useful and unoffensive because it describes a specific reason why someone would come to another country.

Until New Canadian is offensive because it implies that they aren't as good as old or original Canadians. It will never end.

Refugee is a status that lets you know that person had to flee their home country. If you use New Canadian then how does that differentiate from a person who only moved to Canada because they wanted to, married a Canadian, got a new job ect... ? It doesn't.

Everybody becomes the same in name only. It's a really weird forced equality and inclusion. It just lumps anyone who came to Canada together regardless of the real differences in why they came.

I can only hope all of this college craziness comes to a head and just breaks apart. Because stuff like this isn't preparing anyone for the real world. The real world doesn't operate like a college classroom taught by a crazy liberal professor. The real world doesn't have trigger warnings either.
 
Downie accused the conservative libertarian student of “disrespectful objection,” “refusal to stop talking out of turn,” “angry outbursts in response to being required to listen to a trans speaker discuss the reality of white male privilege and sexism,” and “disrespectful references to the validity of trans identity and experience.”

Christ, her language is so spergy and agenda-driven here I'm surprised the student lasted a day in that class without pissing her off.

Pretty sure I graduated college at the perfect moment.
 
wait, hold the phone. if she's this sensitive, then why is she teaching a class about religion? why did she show a TEDx talk about gender in a class about christianity?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back