Hello Captain Manning, I understand your willingness to consider evidence is founded wholly on the basis of if the person you heard the claim from is your internet fwen or not.
Then you don't understand much. My willingness to consider evidence is based largely on the quality of the evidence and/or the credibility of the person presenting it.
Would you agree with the premise that Testefy and Peggy have, shall we say, suboptimal credibility?
We all remember when Testefy_HD almost convinced you VikkiVerse was a convicted murderer based on pure hearsay because he was your internet fwen on discord at the time.
No, he didn't convince me she was a
convicted murderer. He was trying to convince me he killed one of her exs based upon a
oral description of tweet. A actual tweet that was
grossly taken out of context by the knuckheads on Pangea.
But that's kinda the point now, isn't it? You
shouldn't trust people you later find out to be liars. Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. If I were to continue to believe anything Testefy says, at face value, I would be an even bigger idiot.
The yellow caution triangle is apt in ways Testefy probably never imagined. Here is Testefy talking about the picture in question, and attributing it to Pangea:
There is no need to further establish that, but I would urge you to consider the following: what was the motive behind going to the trouble of forging a Walmart sticker and placing it on a Mitch Breitweiser comic? How would this have been done, and why?
To make Breitweiser look bad.
Or as a joke.
But... hear me out here: I'll meet you halfway.
Damaged merchandise.
Somebody made the suggestion to me just now, and I can see how that might be possible. You will note in your photograph the cover is bent.
Is it possible this picture is legit? Sure. Does the picture show something that is true, but requires additional context/explaination? Sure.
What I
don't believe is that all of those books were discounted to $0.50. The available evidence is strongly against that.