#Comicsgate - The Culture Wars Hit The Funny Books!

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I'm not.

I am saying Mitch is untrustworthy
Hutt is possibly more untrustworthy (but at least as untrustworthy)
And Doug handed his salt about you and your Cadre to Hutt to do with.

And the stuff you are trying to construe out of your DMs with Doug seems FAR MORE REASONABLE than what Doug posted on Twitter himself.

So this seems like nothing Drama to distract from IDK actual comic books. And at least Doug is making good quality products on time. Something of the people attacking him in this thread only JDA can say he has done with consistency
Undisputed facts:

Kelsey says "Fuck Doug Ernst."
Ernst asks Kelsey to stop. Kelsey says no.
Ernst harasses the Breitweisers for days via every form of communication, demanding they get Kelsey under control.
The Breitweisers get scared and ask for my help.

I don't know how this chain of events is reasonable to you. It's fucking retarded that Doug acted that way over something so petty on the internet.

At least Doug makes Soulfinder, you're right.
 
Undisputed facts:

Kelsey says "Fuck Doug Ernst."
Ernst asks Kelsey to stop. Kelsey says no.
Ernst harasses the Breitweisers for days via every form of communication, demanding they get Kelsey under control.
The Breitweisers get scared and ask for my help.

I don't know how this chain of events is reasonable to you. It's fucking retarded that Doug acted that way over something so petty on the internet.

At least Doug makes Soulfinder, you're right.
That isn't what your DM"s said.

You said "Harass"

Doug said he tried to talk to Mitch about a professional problem.

Again...you are carrying water for Mitch without receipts showing HARRASMENT. You so Doug being pissy at a fellow creator being an asshole and a miscommunication happening.

So post good receipts Ethan or maybe IDK finish your projects
 
Uh, because Mitch Breitweiser is a lying grifting faggot? Dark Doug aside, holding Mitch to the standard of an ethical human being is just going obfuscate things.

We're talking about someone who didn't get work since 2013 that all the sudden began cranking out God-Emperor Trump art during the height of 2016 MAGA season and once he got the first predictable response from a blue checkmark, began to cry cancelled to anyone who would listen that his "open conservatism" was the reason he wasn't getting work anymore, It wasn't because of the stated reasons his peers gave about his poor work ethic or chronic inability to meet deadlines.

Once milking other people's audiences to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars, Mitch went on to never mention Trump or politics again, disavowed Comicsgate to the press as "extremist", placing his backers he built his business on on the absolute last priority and took 3.5 years to finish his one (1) comic book. Work ethic and chronic inability to meet deadlines in other words.
Conceded, but that still doesn't change what happened HERE in this scenario, with another unethical human being named Doug Ernst.
 
Kelsey says "Fuck Doug Ernst."
Ernst asks Kelsey to stop. Kelsey says no.
Ernst harasses the Breitweisers for days via every form of communication, demanding they get Kelsey under control.
Breitweisers start spreading rumors about Doug and contacting his employers through gay ops I knew about.
The Breitweisers get scared and ask for my help.

I don't know how this chain of events is reasonable to you. It's fucking retarded that Doug acted that way over something so petty on the internet.

At least Doug makes Soulfinder, you're right.
You missed a step so I filled it in for you.

You're welcome.
 
That isn't what your DM"s said.

You said "Harass"

Doug said he tried to talk to Mitch about a professional problem.

Again...you are carrying water for Mitch without receipts showing HARRASMENT. You so Doug being pissy at a fellow creator being an asshole and a miscommunication happening.

So post good receipts Ethan or maybe IDK finish your projects.
Repeated, unwanted contact is harassment.

Which is what Doug describes here when he said, "ignored me, ignored me some more, and ignored me some more and unfollowed me, I then TOLD HIM..."

This is close to what Mitch described. Mitch saids he got a dozen phone calls, emails, texts and DM messages from Doug.
3408224-70dd50acab6d1826a36171bc1b6c4937.jpg


Thats how you are interpreting the information....an Interpretation that just happens to benefit your self styled "Face of the brand" Identity
I don't know what the fuck you're trying to say here.

Neither Mitch or Doug or Hut is a friend of mine. I'm only trying to determine the truth.
 
Repeated, unwanted contact is harassment.

Which is what Doug describes here when he said, "ignored me, ignored me some more, and ignored me some more and unfollowed me, I then TOLD HIM..."

This is close to what Mitch described. Mitch saids he got a dozen phone calls, emails, texts and DM messages from Doug.
View attachment 3409011
And Mitch is a known Liar

And over how long a period?

So your Receipt doesn't show ANYTHING and so you contextualize it with the words of known liar Mitch Breitweiser (who sold you out when it benefited him.)

I don't know what the fuck you're trying to say here.

Neither Mitch or Doug or Hut is a friend of mine. I'm only trying to determine the truth.
The way you are "Interpreting the truth" makes you be the **one above it all on top of comicsgate mountain** and the ** one you can trust about this drama that I am no way a part of**

So that DM says nothing at all
 
Repeated, unwanted contact is harassment.

Which is what Doug describes here when he said, "ignored me, ignored me some more, and ignored me some more and unfollowed me, I then TOLD HIM..."

This is close to what Mitch described. Mitch saids he got a dozen phone calls, emails, texts and DM messages from Doug.
View attachment 3409011
Adopts social justice definition for harassment.

By that definition your boy Kelsey is the main harasser.

I don't know what the fuck you're trying to say here.

Neither Mitch or Doug or Hut is a friend of mine. I'm only trying to determine the truth.
This is the funniest post yet!!!!
 
And Mitch is a known Liar

And over how long a period?

So your Receipt doesn't show ANYTHING and so you contextualize it with the words of known liar Mitch Breitweiser (who sold you out when it benefited him.)

So that DM says nothing at all
They're both liars. It helps to compare both stories and see where they agree.

The both agree that there was a lot of unreciprocated attempts to contact Mitch. Mitch called that "harassment."

Doug says he just wanted to get a few things straight.

For how long a period? Perhaps as long as between the 25th and the 29th of that month, according to my messages.

Mitch says threats of hitpieces were mentioned.

Doug calls that an "uncomfortable conversation."

They're basically on the same page. Why don't you believe what Doug is saying?
 
Repeated, unwanted contact is harassment.

Which is what Doug describes here when he said, "ignored me, ignored me some more, and ignored me some more and unfollowed me, I then TOLD HIM..."

This is close to what Mitch described. Mitch saids he got a dozen phone calls, emails, texts and DM messages from Doug.
View attachment 3409011
So Mitch ghosted Doug mid conversation and Doug blew up his DM's. How the hell was Doug supposed to know Mitch didn't want contact. If Mitch truly didn't want contact he wouldn't have created a sock account to troll Doug.

They're both liars. It helps to compare both stories and see where they agree.

The both agree that there was a lot of unreciprocated attempts to contact Mitch. Mitch called that "harassment."

Doug says he just wanted to get a few things straight.

For how long a period? Between the 25th and the 29th of that month.

Mitch says threats of hitpieces were mentioned.

Doug calls that an "uncomfortable conversation."

They're basically on the same page. Why don't you believe what Doug is saying?
Doug and mitch are both liars.

LMFAO

Address that mail to
Mitch "the bitch" Breitweiser
and his fuckable wife
6510 Cantrell Rd. Little Rock AR 72207
View attachment 1338337
Trust me Mitch you're gonna love my nuts.
View attachment 1338340
 
all this one 1 upmanship over 3 year old beef is gettin kinda boring. Especially, since we can’t get Mitch or Doug’s side of the story. Only circular gotcha style arguments.
 
They're both liars. It helps to compare both stories and see where they agree.

The both agree that there was a lot of unreciprocated attempts to contact Mitch. Mitch called that "harassment."

Doug says he just wanted to get a few things straight.

For how long a period? Perhaps as long as between the 25th and the 29th of that month, according to my messages.

Mitch says threats of hitpieces were mentioned.

Doug calls that an "uncomfortable conversation."

They're basically on the same page. Why don't you believe what Doug is saying?
You know what? When you do things that harm other peoples business (as Doug purports Mitch did) you are going to get things unreciprocated contacts.

Mitch was doing business with Walmart (a fortune 500 company) and attacking another business. That is newsworthy.

So once again you are taking two reasonable things and interpreting it from the lense of Mitch....a known Liar....who sold you out. And (if rumors that have come up here are to be believed) has claimed in the past you harrased him and his wife

What you posted was a whole lot of nothing.

If Doug tried to call Mitch 3 times on 4 separate days that's not harrassment.
 
Mitch says threats of hitpieces were mentioned.

Doug calls that an "uncomfortable conversation."

They're basically on the same page. Why don't you believe what Doug is saying?
Doug said "uncomfortable conversation" to you in DMs, not to Mitch.

If anyone was telling Mitch there was a hit piece coming it would be the guy who received the message about having an "uncomfortable conversation".

You.

And for the record, when someone says they want to have a conversation they are talking about a dialogue and not an article.

One would have to be extremely uncharitable in their interpretation to spin it the way you did.
 
Doug said "uncomfortable conversation" to you in DMs, not to Mitch.

If anyone was telling Mitch there was a hit piece coming it would be the guy who received the message about having an "uncomfortable conversation".

You.

And for the record, when someone says they want to have a conversation they are talking about a dialogue and not an article.

One would have to be extremely uncharitable in their interpretation to spin it the way you did.
I mean when has Ethan been charitable to a rival who is outdoing his platform?
 
all this one 1 upmanship over 3 year old beef is gettin kinda boring. Especially, since we can’t get Mitch or Doug’s side of the story. Only circular gotcha style arguments.
Nah, we have a CG sperg floundering in his attempts to spin his past gay ops in real time here.

And he told on himself.

This is the best material in some time.
 
So Doug goes full retard because some backer were "upset" that the IRL drunken version of "The Dude" as a comic book artist, who wasn't listening to what was going on in the stream at the time, say "Fuck Doug"?
Or he was concerned about the people who were funding his projects were mad.

YOU NOTICE after that happened Doug took backers out of the equation as soon as he was able to make the money work.

if you have a business and a client threatens to pull out you'll do a lot of dumb things, But you can fire a customer who is just buying product
 
So Doug goes full retard because some backer were "upset" that the IRL drunken version of "The Dude" as a comic book artist, who wasn't listening to what was going on in the stream at the time, say "Fuck Doug"?
Yeah. And this was "attacking Doug's business."
 
While Doug sperging for days about what Kelsey Shannon did in a livestream is indisputably whiny and gay, you can't really claim "harassment" when you're at the same time making sock accounts to fuck with said person. Mitch also has an established history of evading perfectly legitimate questions regarding his business and conduct, like when he went dark for years and disconnected all public contact information posted for Allegiance Arts once people started asking where their comic was. I'm sure he'd describe all those people asking where their shit was while the same comic was available in the 50 cent bargain bin at Walmart as "harassment" as well.
 
Back
Top Bottom