#Comicsgate - The Culture Wars Hit The Funny Books!

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
He has an unhealthy obsession with stories where the protagonist dies.
Maybe he has survivor's guilt from his tours in the military and he gets to heroically die vicariously through those stories.

Within the first minute and a half of the video, Moron Meyer describes Breadtube as always being wrong about the people he dislikes yet he watches them anyway. I'm actually curious about which one it is because he never names the channel.
I thought this post identified a very likely candidate:

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/comicsgate.38138/post-22146676
 
Last edited:
He actually did suffer a head injury when he was getting into fights in the military (against his fellow soldiers), but based on his own comments I think he had this personality before that.

I honestly don't really believe any of his rough and tumble tales from his past life. This dude has bad social anxiety that kicks off from doing a livestream. He can't even take return fire on twitter. He seems like a soft as fuck dork and not some haymaker throwing badass.
 
There was a breadtube video recently and it's even the play next video suggested on Meyer's. It's about Critical Drinker. I'm sure Meyer loves this one and may be referencing it.
I heard about this video from a guy called Echo chamberlin, good channel. A little bit of a squish and dose the "the right is correct about a lot of stuff but I'm still a liberal" stuff but makes good videos.
 
Which is stupid. Most comic book nerds are into superheroes. Of course that is what they would like most. That is the audience who watched his videos. There is some serious lack of situational awareness.
I think he actually does have a degree of awareness when it comes to his audience. His "audience" being the 1k to 2k viewers who regularly watch his YouTube content and the 300 to 600 backers his projects usually get.

He knows the people backing him are almost exclusively CG dick riders who have been around since his days of ripping up comics in a Kia. You will often see them turn up in the comments of his IGG campaigns and it's fairly obvious that they haven't been watching his content regularly since those cum dumpster days. They get an email about a new project, they back it, and they move on with no idea how much Richard hates their guts. The small portion of Zack's audience that is willing to spend money on his projects are the ones he openly admits to "culling" because they support his work for the "wrong" reasons. Being a fan of Tard Rage Zack 2017 is one of the wrong reasons.

The other half of his audience are sycophants (and a few hate watchers). These people do not back Zack's campaigns, but do suck his cock in the comments of his YouTube channel. This is the portion of the audience he wants to maintain. They don't buy his shit but that means they're also not making demands of him by virtue of paying for something and then expecting to actually receive it.

Ignoring how he did the same on his videos.
Zack didn't really ignore it, he just deleted most of the evidence of it.

Zack feels like someone who suffered a head injury that messed his hormones or something. Or some sort of mental illness he was born with. He was against SJWs when they were winning and is now for them now that they are losing. This kind of contrarianism is weird to say the least.
Zack seems to genuinely believe that the culture war is over because "comics are good now" and the only people still talking about it are the pop culture equivalent of Japanese holdouts marooned on a remote island, unaware of the Emperor's surrender. This is why half of his current YouTube content is him glazing assorted chunks of goyslop and the other half is him chastising YouTubers who don't glaze said goyslop. He seems oblivious to the fact that the comics pros he used to shit on are either still in the industry or have metastasized into other media, bringing their gay nigger AIDS to the already cancer infested realms of gaming, TV, and movies.

Speaking of comics being good again, here's a recent gem from the comments of his "Comic Book the Comic Book" campaign:

goodcomics .webp
 
By the way, how's that Great War of Separation going? You know, the comic book in which Texas secedes from the U.S.. I think the story was a waste of potential. A good writer could've gotten at least 4 good issues out of it, or one GN.

How about Goodying, the "superhero" who charges neighborhoods for his services? Tone-deaf, with no chance for development without A) changing the concept or B) changing the economy in-universe. Tell me how this is Libertarianism, and not simply greed.
Unless they changed it. I think I recall seeing somewhere that it is supposed to be a four issue story.

As for Goodyng charging for being a hero. Isn't that basically, Luke Cage? And possibly, Booster Gold? Just change money for fame.


far as James bond, people have been invested in bond for....60? 70 years?(pls double check me) they're going to care about how he is portrayed and how his "life" and story ends. But Zack is too stupid and ignorant of the Fandom to understand this.
Yeah. I recall people flipping out with Daniel Craig's portrayal made Bond blonde.
 
Maybe he has survivor's guilt from his tours in the military and he gets to heroically die vicariously through those stories.
It feels like he is obsessed with death.

I think he actually does have a degree of awareness when it comes to his audience. His "audience" being the 1k to 2k viewers who regularly watch his YouTube content and the 300 to 600 backers his projects usually get.

He knows the people backing him are almost exclusively CG dick riders who have been around since his days of ripping up comics in a Kia. You will often see them turn up in the comments of his IGG campaigns and it's fairly obvious that they haven't been watching his content regularly since those cum dumpster days. They get an email about a new project, they back it, and they move on with no idea how much Richard hates their guts. The small portion of Zack's audience that is willing to spend money on his projects are the ones he openly admits to "culling" because they support his work for the "wrong" reasons. Being a fan of Tard Rage Zack 2017 is one of the wrong reasons.
I do not care if he hates them, they are the ones paying his bills. If he was at war, would he say no to a gun purely because it was given to him by someone he had a disagreement with? Would he rather fight the enemy with a knife and a can-do attitude alone?

The other half of his audience are sycophants (and a few hate watchers). These people do not back Zack's campaigns, but do suck his cock in the comments of his YouTube channel. This is the portion of the audience he wants to maintain. They don't buy his shit but that means they're also not making demands of him by virtue of paying for something and then expecting to actually receive it.
There is a sucker born every minute.

Zack didn't really ignore it, he just deleted most of the evidence of it.
That is "ignoring". He shoved most under a rag and pretends it did not happen.

Zack seems to genuinely believe that the culture war is over because "comics are good now" and the only people still talking about it are the pop culture equivalent of Japanese holdouts marooned on a remote island, unaware of the Emperor's surrender. This is why half of his current YouTube content is him glazing assorted chunks of goyslop and the other half is him chastising YouTubers who don't glaze said goyslop. He seems oblivious to the fact that the comics pros he used to shit on are either still in the industry or have metastasized into other media, bringing their gay nigger AIDS to the already cancer infested realms of gaming, TV, and movies.
Comics are good now? Since when? Did the spell the witch cast lift or something? The same people that mandated and wrote the shitty comics are still in power so I fail to see what caused the comics to be good all of the sudden. Has he told us when the ritual to break the spell happened? I must have missed that notification.

Speaking of comics being good again, here's a recent gem from the comments of his "Comic Book the Comic Book" campaign:

goodcomics .webp
This I disagree with. If someone paid for a shitty idea by a chronically late idiot, I do not think they have much right to ask for a refund. You knew what you were getting into. Still, calling him out makes me side with the refund asker.
 
Comics are good now? Since when? Did the spell the witch cast lift or something? The same people that mandated and wrote the shitty comics are still in power so I fail to see what caused the comics to be good all of the sudden. Has he told us when the ritual to break the spell happened? I must have missed that notification.
There was approximately one year between this
edp.webp

And this
Screenshot_2.webp

And absolutely ZERO indication of what happened in that year to make comics "good again" and to cast 90% of Zack's content into the dustbin of irrelevance.
Were Ed Piskor's murderers caught, brought to justice and expelled from the comics industry?

Spoiler: No.
 
There was approximately one year between this
View attachment 7859058

And this
View attachment 7859060

And absolutely ZERO indication of what happened in that year to make comics "good again" and to cast 90% of Zack's content into the dustbin of irrelevance.
Were Ed Piskor's murderers caught, brought to justice and expelled from the comics industry?

Spoiler: No.
He could have easily switched to talking about comics he likes instead of his envy and entitlement driven insanity.
 
He could have easily switched to talking about comics he likes instead of his envy and entitlement driven insanity.
He does, but he's probably only doing it as a cover for when people say, "Why don't you cover these great comics you are raving about?" while the real focus of his channel is slandering people he hates. Honestly, looking back, when he was complaining about bad comics it was probably also cover for slandering the people he hates (In thoses days people like Joe Glass, Mags, Heather Antos, etc). It's just that those actually were really, really bad comics so it worked better.

His actual focus for his channel in some sense hasn't really changed, he just expanded his enemy list and is focusing on the fresher targets more, saving the community posts for his old targets. He's a twisted, hate-filled loser.
 
He does, but he's probably only doing it as a cover for when people say, "Why don't you cover these great comics you are raving about?" while the real focus of his channel is slandering people he hates. Honestly, looking back, when he was complaining about bad comics it was probably also cover for slandering the people he hates (In thoses days people like Joe Glass, Mags, Heather Antos, etc). It's just that those actually were really, really bad comics so it worked better.

His actual focus for his channel in some sense hasn't really changed, he just expanded his enemy list and is focusing on the fresher targets more, saving the community posts for his old targets. He's a twisted, hate-filled loser.
Well, if he finds raging more interesting than the so called "good comics", then he is defeating his argument.
 

Wait till he finds out a man wrote the Wizard of Oz. Or just about any fairy tale.
So Zack isn't subbed to Drinker but still check his channel frequently to bitch about his videos.
I doubt he is smart enough for google alerts or something similar, so he is manually checking the channel every single day and from the looks of it he doesn't even bother to watch them (which is the main criticism Zack has with Drinker).

Also Wizard of Oz production is quite interesting, and it has been covered on youtube several times, as it highlights how abusive Hollywood can be towards actors.
 
So Zack isn't subbed to Drinker but still check his channel frequently to bitch about his videos.
I doubt he is smart enough for google alerts or something similar, so he is manually checking the channel every single day and from the looks of it he doesn't even bother to watch them (which is the main criticism Zack has with Drinker).

Also Wizard of Oz production is quite interesting, and it has been covered on youtube several times, as it highlights how abusive Hollywood can be towards actors.

Another post.
 
I do not care if he hates them, they are the ones paying his bills. If he was at war, would he say no to a gun purely because it was given to him by someone he had a disagreement with? Would he rather fight the enemy with a knife and a can-do attitude alone?
Honestly, yeah, I believe he would. You could tell Zack his shoe was untied and instead of tying it he'd think you were calling him an idiot who doesn't know how to tie his shoes. He would leave it untied to spite you. He interprets advice, suggestions, and even mild criticism as a demand on him and will not listen to any of it.

He does, but he's probably only doing it as a cover for when people say, "Why don't you cover these great comics you are raving about?" while the real focus of his channel is slandering people he hates. Honestly, looking back, when he was complaining about bad comics it was probably also cover for slandering the people he hates (In thoses days people like Joe Glass, Mags, Heather Antos, etc). It's just that those actually were really, really bad comics so it worked better.

His actual focus for his channel in some sense hasn't really changed, he just expanded his enemy list and is focusing on the fresher targets more, saving the community posts for his old targets. He's a twisted, hate-filled loser.
This is exactly what he's doing. If you only browsed his videos, you might be tempted to think he has shifted focus to defending Art & Culture and the newly good comic industry from the BPCs. But if you looked at just the last two weeks of his community posts, you'd see things like Zack critiquing Tee Franklin's TikTok like anybody gives a fuck, predicting Mags will burn in Hell, and proclaiming he'd rather be dead than be Joe Glass.

And this faggot has the balls to tell other people to "move on".
 

Wait till he finds out a man wrote the Wizard of Oz. Or just about any fairy tale.
Richard seems to be convinced that MGM's Wizard of Oz is a girl's movie. This shows that for all his absurd pretensions of culture he knows practically nothing about cinema. He probably doesn't realize how new technicolor was when they made it, or why the Kansas parts of the movie are in black and white. Well, I believe he's probably never seen it. It's one of these pinnacles of cinema which anyone interested in the art form should know at least a little bit about.

I think the most offensive thing I find about Richard is he acts like some kind of authority on movies because of his failed comic book business, despite being an ignorant retard with no taste. If he was just playing a "normal guy critic" who likes the movies that he likes, it would be less annoying. No, he has to pretend he's an expert.

A movie critic talking about the Wizard of Oz is normal. It's like if they talk about Citizen Kane, Rope or 2001: A Space Odyssey. Movies and directors that moved the art of cinema forward. However, Richard's dismissal of the film is perfectly valid, after all, it's no The Crow (2024).
 
Honestly, yeah, I believe he would. You could tell Zack his shoe was untied and instead of tying it he'd think you were calling him an idiot who doesn't know how to tie his shoes. He would leave it untied to spite you. He interprets advice, suggestions, and even mild criticism as a demand on him and will not listen to any of it.
I think he would use the gun and then rant about it for years later.
 
He trusted a wolf with his sheep. On a different note, EVS sucks as a friend and coworker.

Hmm, I'll be honest, it wouldn't be surprising to me at all if there were others. Once you've been in one cheap, crappy porno, being in others is no longer crossing a line after all.

Unless it's gay, of course.
Maybe he had a bigger role in this or was dominated by a chick.
 
Back
Top Bottom