🐱 Coming Out Autistic

CatParty

I was late for lunch. At the time, I was juggling a teaching position with my work as public engagement fellow and running a journal; I’d made an appointment to meet a new graduate student assistant—but time got away from me. I was out of breath by the time I arrived, head still spinning with the effort of code-switching from one role to the next. It would take a few minutes to pull myself together, but the student was already there. I sat down, attempted some small talk (badly), rearranged my jacket on the chair four or five times. When I got myself in order, we commenced our discussion of the journal as we waited on sandwiches.

Advertisement

“I want to ask you something,” she said. “How do you keep all your personas straight? I mean, how do you keep from losing yourself, being autistic and all?”

“I am not autistic,” I corrected. She put down her lunch.

“But you are. Just like me.

Advertisement

She meant no offense. But I felt outed, vulnerable. I’d worked most of my life to present as “normal” and even believed it myself on good days. I couldn’t accept her casual diagnosis. It would take a coming-out journey (my second) to help me arrive at a place of acceptance.

I do not (yet) have an official diagnosis for autism. This is by design. I was born in the late 1970s in the midst of a family crisis. My mother rescued us both from my biological father and keep me hidden away at my grandparents’ house for fear he might violate her restraining order. I developed unusual behaviors. I could walk and talk in full sentences by the age of eight months. As a toddler I put thought bubbles above my crayon drawings with pictographs for meaning. I loved words. I memorized stories, poems, songs. My grandmother considered me “gifted.” But in addition to these traits, I could scarcely be handled or touched. I could not be taken into enclosed or noisy spaces; I bit and scratched other toddlers. I understand now that I suffer easily from sensory overload—I can get physically ill simply walking into a junk shop. Back then, I was just “being weird,” and it was thought best if we kept it to ourselves.

In school, I had to adapt. It was hard going. I excelled in every subject and failed miserably (and embarrassingly) at social cues. But to my young mind, that was just part of growing up, and I wasn’t as good at it as other people. Don’t be weird, I told myself. Don’t be weird.


I’m weird. I memorize lists of normative behaviors (introduce yourself, make eye contact, ask about the family, don’t make those weird noises, don’t tic in front of people, wear the right face for the job), but I never quite get it all right. Even so, I still did not think I was autistic. Being told I must be, by someone who was also autistic, distressed and shocked me. All of my associations for neurodivergence came with baggage.

I may never forgive Rain Man. Dustin Hoffman’s portrayal of Raymond, the autistic elder brother of Charlie Babbitt (Tom Cruise) shows him unable to communicate effectively, prone to public meltdowns, and—because the doctor deems him “unable to make his own decisions” or function in society—ultimately in need of institutionalization. The film never provides Raymond’s point of view—only the perspectives of those around him, who are entrusted to make his decisions for him. I was horrified by the movie. It frightened me. I understood very clearly that there were accepted norms, and that you could be locked away for violating them.

I knew I wasn’t like other people. But I had also internalized the idea that this was “fixable,” that I was curable. Adaptive behavior is recommended to parents of autistic kids today: help your child fit in socially, they say, as though autism were something to be schooled out of you by proper training. Masking may be a means of hiding who you are to prevent being outed (or harassed), but it comes with consequences, including anxiety, exhaustion—and loss of identity. And that, at least in part, was the question put to me by the graduate student when I arrived late to lunch: How do I present all these faces without losing my authenticity? It frightened me that I didn’t have an answer.

Advertisement

In my early attempts to adapt, I used other human beings as look-books. I copied expressions, ways of being in the world, how to perform emotion so I could be better understood. I learned to see social interactions as a play; I can handle any genre—so long as I have the script and know the dress code. Trouble happens when there is no script, or someone changes it halfway through. I spent harrowing lunch hours driving home in traffic because I’d worn the wrong self for the day’s activities. I can feel physically sick if I misread the type of attire expected for an occasion. It has been mistaken in me for vanity, but I’m not dressing to impress others so much as putting on the part required. It came natural to me to play both male and female parts; I excelled in almost any costume. I didn’t know who I was without them.

I left my job in 2018. It should have been liberating; I’d just embarked on a freelance career and had a book contract. Working from home meant nothing to dress for, and without a specific role, I felt anxious and adrift. Similar experiences played out for people around the world in 2020 with pandemic lockdowns; I was an early adopter. I flipped from my work wardrobe of power suit-skirts and heels to men’s jeans and T-shirts—but I felt between selves. Maybe there was a reason for that, my therapist suggested. Did I feel like a different gender from the one I was assigned? It wasn’t a solution, but it was at least the right kind of question.

My body has always been a vehicle for the transportation and translation of ideas, and all the scattered performances were what I collectively called “myself.” The specific bits of my body didn’t really enter into the equation all that much. Many trans people experience terrible dysphoria over aspects of their bodies and seek to change them; some experience none and some fall between. For me, my gender felt wholly outside of, rather than a reflection of, myself. Extrinsic. I had mainly constructed it from other external cues.

Advertisement

I am married to a cisgendered and heterosexual (cis/het) man, and so most people assume I am a cis/het woman. I had neither expressed nor denied it; I just hadn’t considered the question. I have always had traits largely considered “masculine,” and my sexuality is pretty fluid, too. Mark intrigued and interested me; I fell in love with him for that, not because he was a man. So, I had to ask myself: was I just performing as cis/het?

For me, gender was something to be worn and used, a means of interacting with the world; I didn’t know how to see it as an identity in and of itself. Jude Ellison S. Doyle wrote recently in an article titled “Divergent: The Emerging Research on the Connection between Trans Identities and Neurodivergence”: “It wasn’t possible to transition as long as I thought of myself as defective.… It was all so exhausting I could barely leave the house.” I identified with that sentiment. I had been trying to choose a single new gender (and to do it right), but was still only expressing a part of who I am. In my search to understand what my identity meant to me, rather than how I packaged it for other people, I realized I am gender-fluid: nonbinary but containing multitudes. In that new freedom, I found myself returning to that otherpossibility. I had come out as gender fluid; could I also come out as autistic?

In August of 2020, the authors of the largest study to date on the overlap of autism and gender diversity announced their findings: about 25 percent of gender-diverse people have autism (compared to about 5 percent of cisgender people). To put it another way, autistic people are about five times more likely to be transgender or genderfluid than neurotypical people. As Doyle puts it, “’Autistic’ is one of the most trans things you can be.” So why isn’t this connection more well-known?

Advertisement

One point, remarked on by Doyle and also by Eric Garcia in his new book We’re Not Broken: Changing the Autism Conversation, is that autism is underdiagnosed along gendered lines. Cisgender men are identified as autistic more frequently, and at a much younger age, than either cisgender women or gender-diverse people. Even the autistic stereotypes are masculinized; an “extreme male brain” theory posits that autistic people process the world through a “male” lens. In truth, there are no significant differences between male and female brains—but, as Garcia points out, some autistic behaviors are seen as “female behaviors.” It is more likely, then, that a boy who behaves neuro-atypically will be recognized and diagnosed. If parents, teachers and therapists are seeing symptoms along a binary of gender, they’re going to miss people, and among gender-nonconformists, it’s a significant percentage.

For many, an acceptance of autism diagnosis leads to a questioning of gender normative rules and an embrace of gender diversity. Garcia quotes Charlie Garcia-Spiegel, a presenter at Autspace, a conference on, for, and by neurodivergent people: “We [autistic people] can see a lot of the social rules around gender are bullshit, basically.” It suggests that the 25 percent of autistics identifying as trans have been freed to do so by their autism. For me, this occurred in reverse. Questioning how I felt about my gender(s) gave me license to look at the other performed behaviors I’d learned to cultivate. It’s also made me realize how much I have been impacted by social expectations, and how hard I had worked to meet them over the years.

As Eryn Star, an autistic and transmasculine writer and advocate emphasizes, trans people encounter prejudice, violence and denial of access to health care and other services. Some people claim they are illegitimate and want to prohibit them from living authentic lives. At the same time, people with autism are frequently rendered as incapable of making decisions for themselves about their sexuality. This increasingly public disdain and discrimination against trans and autistic people has surprising champions, including author J. K. Rowling, who suggested that autistic trans people assigned female at birth (AFAB) were being pressured to transition. (The autistic community responded with the hashtag #WeAreNotConfused.) “I have faced,” says Star, “the denial of my queerness because I am disabled.” Living authentically as both trans and neuro-atypical means confronting what I had always feared: if you cannot ape normativity, you may be denied your autonomy.

Advertisement

For years, I feared acknowledging my autism because I had absorbed the prejudice surrounding disability. Autistic people (as Garcia’s book title emphasizes) are not broken. Autism is disabling because we live in a world built for and by neurotypical people. Acknowledging my autism is not an admission of weakness; it’s a statement about myself as a self.

For Star, rediscovering their body as an autistic person no longer repressed by social pressure led to discoveries about their gender as transmasculine nonbinary. For comedian Hannah Gadsby, the late diagnosis autism led her to “be kinder to myself” and “not always to take the responsibility.” Both early and late diagnosis with autism offers a window into understanding our own identities. I’ve learned that I have a right to ask for and expect accommodation. Neurotypicals think they are meeting us halfway because they don’t realize we’ve already come miles and miles just to get here. I am neurodivergent. I can be forgiven for missing cues and instead be honored for how much work goes into social interactions, all the time.

So much of this—perhaps all of this—comes down to acceptance, accommodation and justice. After a lifetime of trying to perfect myself, I’m finally living in my own authenticity: autistic, gender-fluid, unique. I’m still in the play. But if I don’t have a script, I can write my own, or I can cut the scene and draw the curtain. No matter how we identify, trans, neurodivergent, neuroqueer, we have a right to be—just as we are.
 
...I can't tell if that's worse than when fat women insist on not dating fat men.
>"Six pack, six feet, six figures"
>Is 500+ lbs. of pure lard, among other things

Imagine not risking a fatal heart attack before 40.

 
  • Like
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
The distortion and woobifying of high functioning autism by these people has always been funny in a morbid sense to me but it's so widespread at this point that I literally have to hide the fact I'm a sperglord when in public. Not that it's hard, there's none of the bullshit these guys go on about that before the distortion only applied to small children. It's pretty much just a "oh no, no more jokes about the aspergers!" situation. Part of the reason why chris was so funny was how he supposedly had the form of autism that makes you basically normal, but would use it as an excuse in the same manner more people do these days for a ll the dumb shit he'd pull. If chris is still a cosmic trendsetter in a few years we'll see people claiming they did the dumbass shit they did because they were literally a god and we'll have articles about "coming out" as gods.
 
Last edited:
For many, an acceptance of autism diagnosis leads to a questioning of gender normative rules and an embrace of gender diversity. Garcia quotes Charlie Garcia-Spiegel, a presenter at Autspace, a conference on, for, and by neurodivergent people: “We [autistic people] can see a lot of the social rules around gender are bullshit, basically.” It suggests that the 25 percent of autistics identifying as trans have been freed to do so by their autism.

Is that really the case, or is it because troons actively target autistic people for grooming?
 
...I can't tell if that's worse than when fat women insist on not dating fat men.

any sort of relationship between two autistic people can go one of three ways, they get along phenomenally, they absolutely can't fucking stand each other, or they can't be fucked to put any effort into getting to know the other one.

I know this from experience.

Knowing this, it's probably best for high functioning autists capable of meaningful relationships to date non-autists.
 
Eh, kinda depends on the severity.

You've got autists that are on a similar level to apes in terms of intelligence, they can't speak properly or anything.

After that you've got the likes of chris chan, who while technically capable of functioning, are so fucked by internal and/or external factors that they never will.

then you've got the troon-goons and other such loons who claim to be autistic... people who can function, but only within an idealized group made of people with no divergent opinions, IE a hugbox. they break down or rage out if anyone pops thier little bubble though.

Finally after that you've got people who, as long as their parents/caretakers put in some effort and get the specialized education and such that Autism tends to require, end up perfectly normal or in some cases Exceptional (in the good sense) people who function just fine and don't go on to become lolcows, because they can contain their obsessive sperging or channel it into something productive. These people, while they'll probably never be social butterflies, are perfectly capable of having relationships and often do.
this is the biggest problem with autism for me, its supposed to be a spectrum but if Chris-chan and you are at the top of the spectrum, then clearly we need to adjust the spectrum. i don't think you've fucked your mother, but if chris-chan is considered the best case scenario it makes others assume an autist like you does. make Chris-chan the middle, and then actual trainables and then people that are normal enough like you at the top. just because Chris-chan and you are "high functioning" compared to most people with autism when it comes to making your mother cum doesn't mean society thinks either of you are high functioning. in fact i'd say Chris-chan is pretty low functioning. Chris spreading the word on being high functioning isn't helping matters.
 
this is the biggest problem with autism for me, its supposed to be a spectrum but if Chris-chan and you are at the top of the spectrum, then clearly we need to adjust the spectrum. i don't think you've fucked your mother, but if chris-chan is considered the best case scenario it makes others assume an autist like you does. make Chris-chan the middle, and then actual trainables and then people that are normal enough like you at the top. just because Chris-chan and you are "high functioning" compared to most people with autism when it comes to making your mother cum doesn't mean society thinks either of you are high functioning. in fact i'd say Chris-chan is pretty low functioning. Chris spreading the word on being high functioning isn't helping matters.
I think that you severely underestimate the resources and training required to make a high functioning autist act half-way human. Chris grew up in a broken household with the internet being his friend and teacher, no shit he turned out the way he did. If you took Chris and put him in a stable household with adequate therapy and support, I can see him holding down a low level job and being able to maintain an apartment. I agree that there should be a middle tier, but Chris is far from low functioning.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
Imagine being a gay autist not autistic enough to have been diagnosed as a kid. Imagine not being on my power level of gay autism.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FierceBrosnan
For comedian Hannah Gadsby,
Hey, this is about you and your confusing feelings, not this unfunny hack. No amount of name-dropping this lecturer will ever make her a comedian.

Just do it like everyone else and post a video of your factorio trains...

Not autistic enough
1647966047812.png
1647966108769.png
 
Last edited:
You don't come out as autistic as much as you learn that others aren't into trains the same way you are, and if they say they love running trains, they probably mean something completely different than what you're interpreting it as.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Elim Garak
There’s a lot of misconceptions about high functioning autism spectrum disorder.

A person that has used his disorder to his social advantage can be considered a lot more than a sperg. In fact they might be more than capable to use their condition in a ‘poor me, I’m special’ kind of way (greta thunberg, case in point).

A high functioning ‘autistic person’ is not only capable of playing the social game, they can play it better than everybody else to a point.

Id imagine some of the most manipulative sociopaths would be on the spectrum and nobody would be none the wiser.

chris-chan is not in this catagory.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: The Lawgiver
There’s a lot of misconceptions about high functioning autism spectrum disorder.

A person that has used his disorder to his social advantage can be considered a lot more than a sperg. In fact they might be more than capable to use their condition in a ‘poor me, I’m special’ kind of way (greta thunberg, case in point).

A high functioning ‘autistic person’ is not only capable of playing the social game, they can play it better than everybody else to a point.

Id imagine some of the most manipulative sociopaths would be on the spectrum and nobody would be none the wiser.

chris-chan is not in this catagory.
If you could "play the social game" to the point you are better than everyone else then you aren't autistic. A big part of the condition is that you don't have the rulebook for the game built into you like everyone else, so you are always at a disadvantage. Even if they have a special interest in human interaction and studied the rules to the social game, they still don't have the natural intuition to put the rules into practice like everyone else. Autists that mask their condition need to put a lot of thought into interactions that are natural to everyone else.

Also I'm pretty sure autism can't be comorbid with sociopaths. While they have some similarities, a key point of autism is that they feel emotions, but struggle processing it and expressing it (hence explosive meltdowns, excitedly info dumping about their obsessions, and awkward love quests), sociopaths however feel little to no emotions at all and without that emotions they wouldn't have a lot of the key symptoms of autism.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Elim Garak
If you could "play the social game" to the point you are better than everyone else then you aren't autistic. A big part of the condition is that you don't have the rulebook for the game built into you like everyone else, so you are always at a disadvantage. Even if they have a special interest in human interaction and studied the rules to the social game, they still don't have the natural intuition to put the rules into practice like everyone else. Autists that mask their condition need to put a lot of thought into interactions that are natural to everyone else.

Also I'm pretty sure autism can't be comorbid with sociopaths. While they have some similarities, a key point of autism is that they feel emotions, but struggle processing it and expressing it (hence explosive meltdowns, excitedly info dumping about their obsessions, and awkward love quests), sociopaths however feel little to no emotions at all and without that emotions they wouldn't have a lot of the key symptoms of autism.
I don’t think you understand how it works.
 
If you could "play the social game" to the point you are better than everyone else then you aren't autistic. A big part of the condition is that you don't have the rulebook for the game built into you like everyone else, so you are always at a disadvantage. Even if they have a special interest in human interaction and studied the rules to the social game, they still don't have the natural intuition to put the rules into practice like everyone else. Autists that mask their condition need to put a lot of thought into interactions that are natural to everyone else.

Also I'm pretty sure autism can't be comorbid with sociopaths. While they have some similarities, a key point of autism is that they feel emotions, but struggle processing it and expressing it (hence explosive meltdowns, excitedly info dumping about their obsessions, and awkward love quests), sociopaths however feel little to no emotions at all and without that emotions they wouldn't have a lot of the key symptoms of autism.
i don't think thats true though, because you have to realize that according to the psych doctors something like 5% of niggers are psychopaths (take rate of psychopaths in prison multiple by niggers that will be in prison at some point in life, divide by nigger population) and i think we've all seen enough videos to know niggers aren't emotionless. in fact some may say they are the motion emotional. meanwhile you could call an autist a nigger all day.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: The Lawgiver
They don't typically want to date male autists and from what I hear less common than male autists overall.

If they are reasonably aware, they know being an autist compulsively obsessed with subjects is a crapshoot. Rarely are autistic interests something that can be channeled into something not only productive, but something that can pay money regularly. A female autist would be shooting herself in the foot. Much better to get some regular guy that can pay for your autistic interests. Or as some say, a daddy.
 
Back