- Joined
- May 13, 2023
Commonwealth of Virginia v. Austin Curtis Peterson - JA010478-02-00 Assault and Battery on Family Member & GC24002688-00 DRUGS: POSSESS SCH I OR II
- Thread starter lol cow supreme
- Start date
- Joined
- Jul 29, 2016
ACTIVATION WORD: DAMN THAT PUSSY NICE
Right after they sent him to rehab too. They flipped the switch on our boy
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2020
Sign an executive order making crack legal? Hunter would go for it too.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2018
Biden has already gotten a lot of shit for pardoning a perpetual white trash fuckup who does nothing but smoke delicious crack-arooski crack rocks all day. Doubt he can get away doing it twice.
East_Clintwood
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2019
Counterpoint, what exactly can the fucking rats do to him at this point other than kvetching since they already shoved him out of the office.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2023
Oh shit. Hopefully this run of bad luck turns around real soon, or we just might lose our beloved cow for a long, long time.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2022
Update to the Circuit Court Case: CR24000241-00 Drug Posession:
Looks like the capias and the probation violation (see case CR24000241-01) was triggered by this case getting to the circuit court, as a Major Violation. Virginia defines violations between "Technical" and "Major". A "Technical Violation" would consist of a few failed drug tests, or not maintaining employment etc and can only be punished by extensions to probation or a few days jail time. Major violations are failing to maintain good behavior or conviction of other offense (they can violate you even if the charge is dismissed) and can result in part or all of the original sentence being imposed.
This shows that the Commonwealth is pursuing the Probation Violation as a Major Violation for the felony drug posession, and not for any failed drug tests. It is yet to be determined if convictions from Domestic Court will be considered for additional violations once those come in (as of right now he's on deferred disposition for the first one and pending hearing on the second).
The judges initials of TKS tells us his case is being handled by Hon. Timothy K. Sanner, Presiding Judge who is the second highest judge in Louisa VA Circuit Court. Though part of the Charlottesville District, it does not appear that he had anything to do in Green county with CWC.
And who did Judge Sanner swear in? Why Judge Stokes! From the Louisa County District Court... (but thats normal its not rigged)
Looks like the capias and the probation violation (see case CR24000241-01) was triggered by this case getting to the circuit court, as a Major Violation. Virginia defines violations between "Technical" and "Major". A "Technical Violation" would consist of a few failed drug tests, or not maintaining employment etc and can only be punished by extensions to probation or a few days jail time. Major violations are failing to maintain good behavior or conviction of other offense (they can violate you even if the charge is dismissed) and can result in part or all of the original sentence being imposed.
This shows that the Commonwealth is pursuing the Probation Violation as a Major Violation for the felony drug posession, and not for any failed drug tests. It is yet to be determined if convictions from Domestic Court will be considered for additional violations once those come in (as of right now he's on deferred disposition for the first one and pending hearing on the second).
The judges initials of TKS tells us his case is being handled by Hon. Timothy K. Sanner, Presiding Judge who is the second highest judge in Louisa VA Circuit Court. Though part of the Charlottesville District, it does not appear that he had anything to do in Green county with CWC.
And who did Judge Sanner swear in? Why Judge Stokes! From the Louisa County District Court... (but thats normal its not rigged)
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jul 4, 2022
Maybe I'm being dumb and overlooking something obvious, but how are you getting that this is related to his car break-in case? On the document you posted it says it was for violating the 07/02/2024 offense:
Which would line up with his crack charge from this summer:
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2022
The Offense is "Violation of Probation On A Felony Offense". Austin is only on probation for one felony offense, his car breakins conviction from 2015. He has no other felony convictions.
The "Offense Date" you are pointing to is the offense date that the offense of "Violation of Probation On a Felony Offense" happened. Austin violated that probation when he committed the crime of Drug Posession, which is July 2.
In summary, the new crime is Violation of Probation, the date Austin violated it is the date he was arrested for drug posession, not the date he was arrested for the original offense he was on probation for.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2022
- Highlight
- #270
I'll work on this more later, but here is the CrimeLine of BossmanJack.
Laughingator
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2022
Bossman has REALLY fucked himself.
This is what happens when you run out of chances and diversion programs... the court and judges get PISSED and throw the book at you.
I suspect old Bossman is going to get some hard time for all of this
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2023
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2020
I am not okay
In hindsight with the way the DA was talking with Bossman's lawyer in the hallway and during the hearings it's not surprising they decided to flip all the switches on our boy though
In hindsight with the way the DA was talking with Bossman's lawyer in the hallway and during the hearings it's not surprising they decided to flip all the switches on our boy though
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2020
So a hooker obsessed, stalking, harassing retard can hold Josh in perpetual litigation, but Boss smokes the tiniest bit of crack, breaks into a few cars and asserts his dominance in the Peterson pride and they just lock him up forever.
They always said when the end of the world arrived there would be signs.
They always said when the end of the world arrived there would be signs.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2022
Sorry, but a bit confused here...
@lolcowsupreme has shown that he's back in jail because of his shennanigans from July 2nd, and not because of the shennanigans afterwards (although I'm sure they played a role in this decision). And it was clear they were willing to let him out on bond for the purposes of rehab because he was relassed from jail (you know, after breakfast on Wednesday, before being hauled in the very next day in time for lunch). And no new charges would suggest that he may actually have followed all of the conditions of his bond for that (short) time.
So then... WHY? Why go through all of the trouble of a court date (after many continuances) to set bond, and have Bossman wait all of that time after approving bond for the conditions to be met... just to release him and then IMMEDIATELY go "Mmmm... actually, no. Tell the flat-foots to bring him back"? Why wouldn't they have decided this BEFORE letting him out on bond? Will his family lose the money for the bond even though it doesn't look like Bossman did anything to violate his most recent bond? Is this just a case of one hand not knowing what the other is doing? Is it because the system is too slow/too inefficient and weird takesies-backsies like this happen often?
Do you think he might have actually violated his bond/caught new charges, and the system is just a little slow and they haven't been entered yet?
@lolcowsupreme has shown that he's back in jail because of his shennanigans from July 2nd, and not because of the shennanigans afterwards (although I'm sure they played a role in this decision). And it was clear they were willing to let him out on bond for the purposes of rehab because he was relassed from jail (you know, after breakfast on Wednesday, before being hauled in the very next day in time for lunch). And no new charges would suggest that he may actually have followed all of the conditions of his bond for that (short) time.
So then... WHY? Why go through all of the trouble of a court date (after many continuances) to set bond, and have Bossman wait all of that time after approving bond for the conditions to be met... just to release him and then IMMEDIATELY go "Mmmm... actually, no. Tell the flat-foots to bring him back"? Why wouldn't they have decided this BEFORE letting him out on bond? Will his family lose the money for the bond even though it doesn't look like Bossman did anything to violate his most recent bond? Is this just a case of one hand not knowing what the other is doing? Is it because the system is too slow/too inefficient and weird takesies-backsies like this happen often?
Do you think he might have actually violated his bond/caught new charges, and the system is just a little slow and they haven't been entered yet?
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2017
Offering to Fuck the Judges Mom was probably not the best legal strategy.
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2022
The best comment I can make on this without a dissertation is that this is caused by Virginia handling the types of cases Austin has across three independent courts.
Taking this last bond situation into the example it went like this:
Locked up for the Drug Posession (and failing rehab and having bond revoked) Austin received a bond from the General District court on November 21. This is the same time give or take that the district court then sent the felony itself to be handled by the circuit court, who generally honors the bond set in the case by the district court before they get it
Recieving the bond in District court Austin then went and asked the Domestic court for a bond on the second Domestic Violence charge and that was granted.
Austin was not allowed out on the first bond with the District court until his paperwork cleared with the Circuit court. Sometimes this is fast, sometimes its slow. But that was received and he was allowed out, and he left on the 5th.
Now that the case and paperwork was with the Circuit Court, someone putting the court information together (or a system later that night) went "Hey. This guy is already on probation with the Virginia Circuit Courts in Williamsburg" and spawned the violation. I feel this was system automated and happened during an overnight reconciliation.
So the next day when the system had spat out "hey this guy who just had a new case come to us is already on probation from us, set up a probation violation charge" and the magristrate worked it that morning, putting the arrest out for bossman. I assume its at this point he was notified and turned himself back in.
Clear as mud? Good.
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2020
The right hand not knowing what the left hand is doing is classic bureaucracy
- Joined
- Jun 12, 2020
"Differed' disposition should be deferred I think?
For a future line you could add his DV #2 trial date of February 21 2025 and the 13th of January 2025 grand jury date.
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2022
@lol cow supreme Thank you for explaining.
So then, in the eyes of the Virginia Circuit Courts in Williamsburg, none of the chances Bossman got in Lousia (or wherever he is) really mattered in any meaningful way? If their system was just REALLY slow and all of this has to just do with ONLY his possession charge in July (because the DVs are being handled in a separate court so it's out of sight out of mind, and because violations of the bond from July aren't currently being considered either), that would mean that he's been locked to this path since summer. It was all just a matter of time before the computer caught up with everything. All of his ridiculous behaviour from July to October (failing piss-tests, getting his ass kicked out of that manchild summer camp, etc) didn't really matter IRT his original probation (they obviously earned him new charges and at least one new conviction so far). AND, even if he was a good boy and had behaved himself, it might not have made a difference because it's all about that July possession charge? Or am I seeing this wrong?
Or do you think that all of his bullshit from the last 5 months is what caused the Virginia circuit Courts in Williamsburg to react? Like, they're looking over this and saying, "Wait.... no, this guy's been a total dick for the last 5 months. Violate him on the July 2 drug charge"?
So then, in the eyes of the Virginia Circuit Courts in Williamsburg, none of the chances Bossman got in Lousia (or wherever he is) really mattered in any meaningful way? If their system was just REALLY slow and all of this has to just do with ONLY his possession charge in July (because the DVs are being handled in a separate court so it's out of sight out of mind, and because violations of the bond from July aren't currently being considered either), that would mean that he's been locked to this path since summer. It was all just a matter of time before the computer caught up with everything. All of his ridiculous behaviour from July to October (failing piss-tests, getting his ass kicked out of that manchild summer camp, etc) didn't really matter IRT his original probation (they obviously earned him new charges and at least one new conviction so far). AND, even if he was a good boy and had behaved himself, it might not have made a difference because it's all about that July possession charge? Or am I seeing this wrong?
Or do you think that all of his bullshit from the last 5 months is what caused the Virginia circuit Courts in Williamsburg to react? Like, they're looking over this and saying, "Wait.... no, this guy's been a total dick for the last 5 months. Violate him on the July 2 drug charge"?