Commonwealth of Virginia v. Austin Curtis Peterson - JA010478-02-00 Assault and Battery on Family Member & GC24002688-00 DRUGS: POSSESS SCH I OR II

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Guess his high dollar lawyer he brags about didn't advise him to the advantages of turning himself in.
That's just because he was too busy with gamba. He would've won big if it wasn't for the rat cops. Anyway, are we going to continue to use this thread or get a new one when he is charged?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dropa5pack
Updated mugshot:

1748091225294.webp
 
Austin seems to have gotten lucky with the docketing and despite being arrested Friday before the three day weekend, has gotten on the J&DR docket for appointing an attorney and bond hearing. If approved he will still need a bond from the Circuit court.

This type of hearing is extremely administrative, with either asking for the attorney's name or if a court appointed is necessary. Typically bond can/will be addressed at these as well.

1748350505963.webp
 
Minor update on the J&DR hearing this morning. It appears the same court appointed attorney (Bryan Jones, who drives a clapped out Honda Fit and wears the shabbiest looking sports coats) has been assigned to the case. Austin claims that "the attorney's already been paid" eluding that he has elected to hire this schlub. but hes one of the two regular court appointed in Louisa, and he's likely working on the taxpayers dime again (FYI they only get $330 per charge. You will see Austin get fined $330 court costs as he was last time).

1748352579780.webp

No bond updates
 
Next hearing for the Misdemanor Probation Violation in the Juvenile and Domestic Relations court is August 15, 2025. No update on the court system if bond was addressed/given. I would assume yes with that much time lapsing between today and the hearing. If for some reason it wasnt, he would sit in jail for almost the same amount of time they could give him for this particular charge.

1748353120000.webp

We will know more once the Circuit court updates their case.
 
Next hearing for the Misdemanor Probation Violation in the Juvenile and Domestic Relations court is August 15, 2025. No update on the court system if bond was addressed/given. I would assume yes with that much time lapsing between today and the hearing.
Wouldn't be surprised if they didn't allow him to bond out.
If for some reason it wasnt, he would sit in jail for almost the same amount of time they could give him for this particular charge.
Considering this is the same place that kept Chris-Chan in for longer than his maximum possible sentence, and then dropped charges, I'm not holding my breath for our nigga to get out early.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: Dropa5pack
Considering this is the same place that kept Chris-Chan in for longer than his maximum possible sentence, and then dropped charges, I'm not holding my breath for our nigga to get out early.
The jail doesnt decide to hold you. The court does, and Austin is in a completely separate court jurisdiction than CWC was. They delayed because they did not know how to handle a retard tranny raping their elderly mother so just waited out the clock.

The jail is a co-op jail for 4 counties that are too small to run their own, but those housed are done so at their home jurisdictions orders.
 
Austin has been docketed for the same hearing in Circuit Court to appoint counsel and likely address bond for tomorrow morning May 28. This will be asking for a bond for his Felony Probation Violation.
View attachment 7417804

Given his history, as much as I want a Bossman stream, the bond is either going to be pointlessly high and not worth doing or they simply won't grant it. Right?

Might as well start getting that time served racked up under the circumstances..
 
Given his history, as much as I want a Bossman stream, the bond is either going to be pointlessly high and not worth doing or they simply won't grant it. Right?

Might as well start getting that time served racked up under the circumstances..
Bond takes into consideration 3 things. 1: Are you a danger to society? 2: Will you abscond? 3: Will you cooperate with terms?

1: Austin is not a danger, at least in relation to these charges. its not as though Austin caught a new violent charge in either case. They are just probation violations. One stemming from drug use/failed drug tests, and the other for the initial charge from July that he already completed his sentence for. There is no argument here that Austin is a danger to society based on the charge he has in either court of probation violation at this time.

2: Austin doesn't even have a car, and has made all of his actual court appearances. Granted he was in jail for all of them. Austin has extreme ties to the community in that he has no way out of his own parents house. The only argument that could be made for denying on these grounds is Austin's prior conviction of fleeing and eluding. But he was punished for that and its not a new charge. I do not see it being a great argument to deny bond based on Austin not showing up for court. Yes he was a "fugitive" on these warrants, but they were never served on him. This is also where they require cash/bail to be paid to further incentivize attendance. I feel a modest bond would ensure his apperances.

3: Austin has a history of non-cooperation with bond conditions, having bond revoked several times. in the Domestic court he recently violated the probation in March. This is the most valid argument for opposing bond. However in the Domestic court the most he could do is 90 days I believe, and keeping him in jail for 79 days until the hearing would be excessive. it is just a misdemeanor probation technical violation. Again this is where the cash paid could be higher to ensure compliance.

Things not considered but could come into play are both judges level of annoyance. Judges are supposed to be impartial and weigh the facts and laws but they are people. I would expect that annoyance to play out more in the sentencing side once guilt of the probation violation is determined rather than in denying bond for someone who's innocence is to be presumed.
 
Austin had his first hearing in Louisa Circuit court this morning regarding his 2nd felony probation violation (the probation for the car break ins from 2015). His probation has been revoked and he was sentenced today to 2 years additional probation.
Retard luck wins again. Our boy is coming home.

1748447303464.webp

As I previously stated could happen, it seems the judge looked at this as a past event that was already taken into consideration with his July 2 drug possession, and has elected to only sentence him to 2 years supervised probation, to run concurrently with his current probation. This is best possible outcome.

fuck :pickle:
 
Austin had his first hearing in Louisa Circuit court this morning regarding his 2nd felony probation violation (the probation for the car break ins from 2015). His probation has been revoked and he was sentenced today to 2 years additional probation.
Retard luck wins again. Our boy is coming home.

View attachment 7421939

As I previously stated could happen, it seems the judge looked at this as a past event that was already taken into consideration with his July 2 drug possession, and has elected to only sentence him to 2 years supervised probation, to run concurrently with his current probation. This is best possible outcome.

fuck :pickle:

just like all his gambling: he wins, and then loses it all. it's only a matter of time before he loses this win.
 
Back