Community Driven Happening Feed (Version 1)

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Pope Negro Joe the XIIIth said:
Yep, homosexuality was invented in 1968 just to make you angry.
Click to expand...
I think he was just mad because the lesbo positioned herself as "one of the good ones". And if you're gonna go down that road you might as well suck "based" troon dick. Anyone who has lived through the early 2000s and watched the slippery slope happen in real time right before their eyes should be hyper vigilant against any degenerate bs.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
  • Autistic
Reactions: Apis mellifera, Casshern, AnotherBlackstarTest and 17 others
BeeseChurger said:
I think he was just mad because the lesbo positioned herself as "one of the good ones". And if you're gonna go down that road you might as well suck "based" troon dick. Anyone who has lived through the early 2000s and watched the slippery slope happen in real time right before their eyes should be hyper vigilant against any degenerate bs.
Click to expand...
That's fine, but as someone who stood at the top of this slide this has nothing to do with LGB. This is the medicalization of sexuality and an oversaturation of deviant pornography belt fed into the American culture of "you do yours and I'll do mine" and twisted with political correctness to turn it against itself.

I don't know how to explain this to you younger people but it just wasn't like this. Yeah we were told about homosexuality, but they sure as fuck didn't teach us how to ass fuck in sex ed. I mean fuck, do you guys even have sex ed anymore? This "kink at pride" shit lol no. That shit stayed at Folsom. And look, San Francisco was fucked already.

You know when this all started getting fucked up? When the slide started? When people who weren't homosexual or bisexual starting pretending to be and using it as a weapon. I've never seen a single one of my LGB friends bring up their sexuality in the real world. No one normal does that. And shit, once you told a bunch of sexual offenders they could wear a dress and see irl naked girls and women, then proceed to act like the incel movement they scream about doesn't have the exact same fucking mindset, we were all fucked. It's hilarious in a pitiful way.

This has nothing to do with being homo, this is setting up the world from Idiocracy where Starbucks sells handjobs and others sell worse.
 
  • Agree
  • Winner
  • Dumb
Reactions: CEO of Lurkers, Apis mellifera, Sperghetti and 24 others
Pope Negro Joe the XIIIth said:
That's fine, but as someone who stood at the top of this slide this has nothing to do with LGB. This is the medicalization of sexuality and an oversaturation of deviant pornography belt fed into the American culture of "you do yours and I'll do mine" and twisted with political correctness to turn it against itself.

I don't know how to explain this to you younger people but it just wasn't like this. Yeah we were told about homosexuality, but they sure as fuck didn't teach us how to ass fuck in sex ed. I mean fuck, do you guys even have sex ed anymore? This "kink at pride" shit lol no. That shit stayed at Folsom. And look, San Francisco was fucked already.

You know when this all started getting fucked up? When the slide started? When people who weren't homosexual or bisexual starting pretending to be and using it as a weapon. I've never seen a single one of my LGB friends bring up their sexuality in the real world. No one normal does that. And shit, once you told a bunch of sexual offenders they could wear a dress and see irl naked girls and women, then proceed to act like the incel movement they scream about doesn't have the exact same fucking mindset, we were all fucked. It's hilarious in a pitiful way.

This has nothing to do with being homo, this is setting up the world from Idiocracy where Starbucks sells handjobs and others sell worse.
Click to expand...
Shamelessly stolen from @Ms. Cegination and done worse:
1626189768155.jpg
 
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Drama keen, CEO of Lurkers, Orange Rhymer and 52 others
Pope Negro Joe the XIIIth said:
That's fine, but as someone who stood at the top of this slide this has nothing to do with LGB. This is the medicalization of sexuality and an oversaturation of deviant pornography belt fed into the American culture of "you do yours and I'll do mine" and twisted with political correctness to turn it against itself...
Click to expand...
So you'd agree that it would be best for all if we could "undo" the past say...20 years and slide the LGB agenda right up the slope around where they were allowed to vote? Cause obviously you cannot unring that bell. And that's why I empathize with assmad puritans like the other guy you quoted before me. If there's no way back then the best we can do is stomp on the brake as hard as we can.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Apis mellifera, FierceBrosnan, UnsufficentBoobage and 2 others
BeeseChurger said:
So you'd agree that it would be best for all if we could "undo" the past say...20 years and slide the LGB agenda right up the slope around where they were allowed to vote? Cause obviously you cannot unring that bell. And that's why I empathize with assmad puritans like the other guy you quoted before me. If there's no way back then the best we can do is stomp on the brake as hard as we can.
Click to expand...
I believe the right to marriage was needed but really I think the way they went about it was where things went wrong. The endrun showed people with less than pure intentions that they didn't need the people's approval, just the right people's approval.

And yeah, we should probably move this conversation if we go further lol.
 
  • Agree
  • Dumb
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Apis mellifera, Casshern, Sperghetti and 11 others
BeeseChurger said:
I think he was just mad because the lesbo positioned herself as "one of the good ones". And if you're gonna go down that road you might as well suck "based" troon dick. Anyone who has lived through the early 2000s and watched the slippery slope happen in real time right before their eyes should be hyper vigilant against any degenerate bs.
Click to expand...
No I positioned facts lol. You can't act on hysteria when there's plenty of research to say "yeah that's not it bro".

I said we are kiwis, not based. There is a difference. We are cringe, autistic, and retards but we are free :semperfi:
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
  • Feels
Reactions: Casshern, AprilRains, Sperghetti and 6 others
Meiwaku said:
No I positioned facts lol. You can't act on hysteria when there's plenty of research to say "yeah that's not it bro".

I said we are kiwis, not based. There is a difference. We are cringe, autistic, and retards but we are free :semperfi:
Click to expand...
Happening: retards get mad that not everyone hates teh gheys.

Lmfao.
 
  • Dumb
  • Winner
  • Feels
Reactions: Casshern, Sperghetti, Meth Until Death and 18 others
Kendrick said:
I wonder what action they are taking, because from their message they sound sorry that... People interpreted that display as gross offense, not that they allowed such a display in front of childrens trying to learn to like reading.
Click to expand...
Pretty much. There's more information on places like the I Hypocrite twitter, where the official library account was celebrating the performer with the bare ass and large vibrator-penis, and they only changed their tune when (I think) the local MP was appalled. Until then they were ignoring parental outrage, because a place that hires a guy with a giant vibrator on his costume for children's story time isn't operating within the bounds of reality. If the story hadn't blown up, anyone objecting would have just been called close-minded bigots.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: 100pcent, Rezza, Fìddlesticks and 3 others
Pope Negro Joe the XIIIth said:
Ok, I don't know how to tell you guys this but there's a bunch of newfags who have their profiles locked from viewing. I find this unacceptable, as how can they be shitposted at as according to our traditions?
Click to expand...
I've noticed this as well perhaps if there was a temporary hold before you can close it off so we can send someone racial slurs as tides and greetings?
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Apis mellifera, UnsufficentBoobage, FierceBrosnan and 4 others
  • DRINK!
  • Like
Reactions: Meiwaku and FierceBrosnan
Sinner's Sandwich said:
This monstrosity performed at a library in the UK in front of CHILDREN. Apparently this should encourage children to suck cocks err read books.
View attachment 2341594
View attachment 2341596
Of course people were outraged and the pedo company responsible for this horror apologized on twitter and apparently their website is down.
View attachment 2341597

They are indeed coming for your children.
Click to expand...
I legitimately would like to know what was the thought process that actually believed that that costume was acceptable at any point?

Like, I've seen some people have good intentions and it just completely backfires on them. How did that ever get past the planning stage, much less actually making the costume, much less actually using it?

I can't even chalk this one up to stupidity. It HAS to be malicious. No well-meaning idiot would ever think putting a fake penis on a costume made for kids was a good idea.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Sperghetti, Jub-Jub, Meiwaku and 13 others
Salubrious said:
I legitimately would like to know what was the thought process that actually believed that that costume was acceptable at any point?

Like, I've seen some people have good intentions and it just completely backfires on them. How did that ever get past the planning stage, much less actually making the costume, much less actually using it?
Click to expand...
Because how are children going to suck all this pedo dick if they're scared of seeing them? Gotta get em used to it.

Tfw you're not even sure this is a joke.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Feels
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: 100pcent, snackbar hero, ICanLurkNoMore and 6 others
Salubrious said:
I legitimately would like to know what was the thought process that actually believed that that costume was acceptable at any point?

Like, I've seen some people have good intentions and it just completely backfires on them. How did that ever get past the planning stage, much less actually making the costume, much less actually using it?

I can't even chalk this one up to stupidity. It HAS to be malicious. No well-meaning idiot would ever think putting a fake penis on a costume made for kids was a good idea.
Click to expand...
It's either a case of not vetting who/what you hire for these 'performances' or much more likely seeing what you can get away with before you get backlash.
 
  • Agree
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: Meiwaku, Rezza, ICanLurkNoMore and 6 others
  • Winner
  • Like
  • Semper Fidelis
Reactions: Apis mellifera, Orange Rhymer, Francesco Dellamorte and 25 others
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back