Communsim vs facism - which one would you live under

facism or communism

  • Communism

    Votes: 16 27.6%
  • facism

    Votes: 42 72.4%

  • Total voters
    58
This thread is filled with the most spergy shit I've seen in years
Fascism has economically ruined Italy in its strongest points: tourism and agriculture. Closed gates, disgusting new buildings covering ancient art that wasn't classical; burned down tons of wine farms to force cereal production.
Not to mention that disaster that was entering in war. Light improver clothes, dated weapons remained from the 1st war, barely functioning machines. Many soldiers died just because of the broken weaponry or for the cold when barely entered russia. During the last phases both Mussolini and Hitler sent children to fight americans.
And the south Italy, oh the south! It was used as a trash bin to throw all criminals from the north (Mussolini believed Milan should have been the capital), never got support for technology, lived under extremely poor sanitary conditions, and suffered the agriculture reforms the most.
Your entire life was planned and programmed, from your education to your free time, which all revolved around war and love for the Duce, from your birth to your death.
Anyone who had a place of political or economic relevancy could have accused you of communism, and you would get beat up, tortured and inprisoned.

Once you start telling yourself "maybe fascism was not that bad" it's probably time to stop reading /pol/, or one day you'll too get a thread here for being a skitzofascist.
 
This thread is filled with the most spergy shit I've seen in years
Fascism has economically ruined Italy in its strongest points: tourism and agriculture. Closed gates, disgusting new buildings covering ancient art that wasn't classical; burned down tons of wine farms to force cereal production.
Not to mention that disaster that was entering in war. Light improver clothes, dated weapons remained from the 1st war, barely functioning machines. Many soldiers died just because of the broken weaponry or for the cold when barely entered russia. During the last phases both Mussolini and Hitler sent children to fight americans.
And the south Italy, oh the south! It was used as a trash bin to throw all criminals from the north (Mussolini believed Milan should have been the capital), never got support for technology, lived under extremely poor sanitary conditions, and suffered the agriculture reforms the most.
Your entire life was planned and programmed, from your education to your free time, which all revolved around war and love for the Duce, from your birth to your death.
Anyone who had a place of political or economic relevancy could have accused you of communism, and you would get beat up, tortured and inprisoned.

Once you start telling yourself "maybe fascism was not that bad" it's probably time to stop reading /pol/, or one day you'll too get a thread here for being a skitzofascist.

My preference was mostly the "lesser" of two terrible evils. I hope this thread isn't going about railing on about the wonders of Fascism rather than a simple thought experiment. Both of these government systems are rather similar in operation with Fascism going to more prefer the "Strong Man" outright whereas communism gets the "strong man" into power. Also the problem when we go on about communism and fascism is what type of either ideology as we are talking about as Spanish Fascism isn't certainly the same as Finnish Fascism same with Soviet Communism isn't the same as Cuban Communism.
 
Fascism, for sure. For all its flaws, at least it aspires to greatness; great advances in science, technology, and engineering were made under fascism. Plus, it expects greatness from its citizenry and fosters a strong uniform culture. Communism, on the other hand, is nothing more than shared mediocrity. Just a bunch of failures who've never achieved anything in their lives trying to drag everyone else down to their level.

I wouldn't say that necessarily. Look at what people in the Soviet Union managed to achieve -- they were ahead of us in the space race for the most part. (Except for getting to the moon -- USA! USA! USA!). A lot of great literature, art, music, sports, etc came from Russia during the communist period. That being said, I wouldn't have wanted to live under such a regime, but you can't deny those accomplishments.

Neither of them emphasize individuality, or creativity. Quite the opposite.
 
Assuming the "communism" intended in this question is a Stalinist/Juche authoritarian state (as opposed to a libertarian socialist or anarcho-communist society)....communism. If my human rights are going to be infringed upon in a huge way, I'd at least be more likely to have the necessities of life provided for in such a society (even if those provisions aren't of particularly luxurious quality).
 
Fascism sounds far more livable if you aren't some minority that said fascist party has deemed undesirable. Sure everyone who isn't like is suffering in perpetual torment, but at least there is the opportunity of change and possibly being at the forefront of overthrowing said fascist governments. People in Hitler's circle grew tired of his tactical ineptitude which led to the likes of Clauss von Stauffenberg attempting Operation: Valkyrie.
 
Fascism sounds far more livable if you aren't some minority that said fascist party has deemed undesirable. Sure everyone who isn't like is suffering in perpetual torment, but at least there is the opportunity of change and possibly being at the forefront of overthrowing said fascist governments. People in Hitler's circle grew tired of his tactical ineptitude which led to the likes of Clauss von Stauffenberg attempting Operation: Valkyrie.

A Stalinist/Juche government could be overthrown too.
 
Fascism. At least I could have a job, retain assets, and feed myself, since there would still be a market economy and limited property rights. I have ancestors/relatives that lived under both (distant cousins in Italy and grandparents in Poland) and from their stories fascism seemed preferable, if you were willing to set aside your morals.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Coleman Francis
Back