Compulsory gun ownership/open carry - A thought experiment

Penis Drager

Schrödinger's retard
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Aug 8, 2020
What if we made it mandatory for all citizens over a particular age of [place country here] to own at least one gun, perhaps providing a government issue sidearm free of charge as well?
Perhaps we could go even further and mandate that the gun be visible (in a holster) at all times when in pubic. Some restrictions/exceptions may apply like requiring people to temporarily relinquish them before entering a courtroom.
How would these changes affect the culture of interest? Would you support such a policy?
 
Your just asking for stupid to do as stupid does. Some people are just not responsible/smart enough to carry weapons. I am all for better weapon handling training in order to get a gun license though. It would weed out the retards and help get weapons into the hands of responsible adults who would know how to protect themselves and possibly others should the police not be around to stop a violent crime.

However, just as no one should be barred from carrying a weapon no one should be forced to carry a weapon if they don't want to.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: I Love Beef
It reminds me of Brazil's compulsory voting, where it sounds like a good idea in some aspects but it turns out most people get disgruntled and don't want to comply once it becomes mandatory and not just a protected right. You then also have to account for those with both physical and mental disabilities.

I think it'd make more sense to instead have an elective or series of classes in the highschool range that go over basics of gun safety and how to legally acquire one when they're of age and the laws that govern them in their state. That would encourage proper gun ownership and care with no real downside, and I've seen some schools do something similar with recreational vehicles in certain states where they'll teach the basics of handling small watercraft and snow mobiles.
 
No, gun ownership is a choice. Open carry is something... well that depends on where you live. If you live in a high crime state like say, Florida people are going to have more interest in that type of thing. Any place where you can get routinely carjacked at the grocery store.
The right to bear arms is not a demand as you say.

It is not a burden it is a freedom.
 
I think it'd make more sense to instead have an elective or series of classes in the highschool range that go over basics of gun safety and how to legally acquire one when they're of age and the laws that govern them in their state. That would encourage proper gun ownership and care with no real downside, and I've seen some schools do something similar with recreational vehicles in certain states where they'll teach the basics of handling small watercraft and snow mobiles.
1495992226920.jpg
 
Personally,I do not want to own a gun.
I want the freedom to make that choice.
I do not want that choice either taken from me nor made for me.
 
What if we made it mandatory for all citizens over a particular age of [place country here] to own at least one gun, perhaps providing a government issue sidearm free of charge as well?
Perhaps we could go even further and mandate that the gun be visible (in a holster) at all times when in pubic. Some restrictions/exceptions may apply like requiring people to temporarily relinquish them before entering a courtroom.
Kennesaw is a city in Cobb County, Georgia, United States, located in the greater Atlanta metropolitan area known as "Metro-Atlanta". The city is perhaps best known nationally today for its mandatory gun-possession ordinance requiring all households in Kennesaw to have a gun, with certain exceptions, passed in response to a handgun ban in Morton Grove, Illinois. In 1982 the city passed an ordinance [Sec 34-21]

(a) In order to provide for the emergency management of the city, and further in order to provide for and protect the safety, security and general welfare of the city and its inhabitants, every head of household residing in the city limits is required to maintain a firearm, together with ammunition therefore. (b) Exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who suffer a physical or mental disability which would prohibit them from using such a firearm. Further exempt from the effect of this section are those heads of households who are paupers or who conscientiously oppose maintaining firearms as a result of beliefs or religious doctrine, or persons convicted of a felony.

Nelson in Georgia, Nucla in Colorado, Gun Barrel City in Texas, and Virgin in Utah have also since passed such laws. Most importantly, what effects it had were largely that certain Democrat demographics kept away in fear and vitally it became quickly known that it could not be enforced outside of cultural pressures.

How would these changes affect the culture of interest?
It would gentrify the community over-night, shootings would spike and then die down. Criminal behavior and jail populations would plummet as the morgues become occupied by the dregs instead. Over time, I imagine it would be like the sword carrying Early modern Europeans. Dueling might make a comeback, depending on the case law concerning what would happen if two people shot at each other in a field and everyone involved refused to speak about it to the police. I could easily see such cases leading to duels leading to honor codes back into cases and so on.

Courts would have to thoroughly manage the situation in order to make sure the people dueling were punished rather than let go, in the event that no-one spoke to the police, on the account of no pressed charges by either parties toward the other. Hard to say, but honor codes would be a welcome sight civilizationally from my point of view at least.

Would you support such a policy?
Sure, provided sanity reigned and conscientious objection or disability were given exemption. I would like to live in such a town, and would welcome my section of gun-shy America into the light of proper freedom. However, I don't think my state, one of the worst, is going to allow this to pass. Nor, in the age of sanctuary regions where sub-federal police forces are refusing to comply with Republican federal laws, would many places in America today.
 
Last edited:
I would prefer compulsory gun ownership just for the fact that it'd make police budgets plummet. The less police, and more personal responsibility, people have, the better we'll all be off
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Haim Arlosoroff
I am all for better weapon handling training in order to get a gun license...

However, just as no one should be barred from carrying a weapon...

Pick one... Law abiding citizens aren't the problem. This is one of those feel-good takes that make no logical sense. How about no license needed to carry and safe firearms handling for anyone who wants it? Or required firearms training whether you intend on owning one or not. Could be HS graduation requirement.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Haim Arlosoroff
Back