Conservapedia

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Right. I think most political opinions have some merit and make some good points, it's just that when people get carried away, there's nothing but trouble (like that one thread we have on radical feminism - it's not that feminism is bad, some people go overboard).
 
GrandNumberOfPounds said:
Right. I think most political opinions have some merit and make some good points, it's just that when people get carried away, there's nothing but trouble (like that one thread we have on radical feminism - it's not that feminism is bad, some people go overboard).
Click to expand...
Yeah, if one side of the political spectrum had no good points at all, they wouldn't really exist at all or have any support whatsoever. Although I side a lot more with the liberals. There was a time when I was opening myself up to the idea of at least considering the fact that conservatives have some good practices, and yeah, I still favor the Democrats. It's hard to actually be a complete independent.

And yeah, radical feminism should by no means be associated with feminism at all. It's going for the opposite of what feminism aims for.
 
Crazy Pacer said:
Conservative morons are just really, really loud. They also say things like "legitimate rape" and support school segregation.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/04/1 ... 72288.html
Click to expand...
Oh my god I hate the "legitimate rape" stuff. Even more than people saying that, I hate the fact that there are people out there that actually believe it. Hell, the guy that said that "legitimate rape will never cause pregnancy" (todd akin) got the full support from Mitt Romney during the elections if I remember correctly.
 
The Hunter said:
bungholio said:
Bgheff said:
Since most of you seem to be liberal, i figured you'd enjoy this page.
Click to expand...

I don't like the whackos from either side of politics. For me, the "social justice" morons are just as bad as the likes of Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh etc.
Click to expand...
Same, but there seem to be more conservative morons than liberal. Either that, or the conservative ones are praised among their group as opposed to social justice "warriors" that stay obscure and nameless. Still, I like to stay away from the crazies. Stools don't have feelings ffs, and being barely below the poverty line isn't, "filthy stinking rich," especially in comparison to someone who probably posted that from an iPad.
Click to expand...

Its far more evened out in the UK.

For every Richard "prostitutes are the most disgusting specimens of subhumanity and deserve it when murdered by a serial killer" LittleJohn you have a Seamus "Everything Britain and the west does is evil and imperialistic, thus everyone who hates Britain and the West is a saint including stalin, pol pot and gaddafi" Milne. For every Christopher Monkton you have a George Galloway.
 
I have too many shoes to be accused of "destroying capitalism" ... just sayin'.
 
I'm "liberal" only because I am Black and don't support White Supremacist conservatism. I'm pretty conservative (at least for my personal life) on many issues, especially since I am pro-gun.

I have come across this page a few times when I was doing research on George Lincoln Rockwell. I thought that it was satire; maybe I was wrong.
 
BallsDeep4Cash said:
I thought that it was satire; maybe I was wrong.
Click to expand...

As far as I know its almost immposible to know it, same with any other of their articles.
The article on fucking LIBERALISM for example, is surprisingly tame, and there are 9001 articles about homosexuality and homosexual sex.
 
Tim Buckley said:
BallsDeep4Cash said:
I thought that it was satire; maybe I was wrong.
Click to expand...

As far as I know its almost immposible to know it, same with any other of their articles.
The article on fucking LIBERALISM for example, is surprisingly tame, and there are 9001 articles about homosexuality and homosexual sex.
Click to expand...


These people think and talk about gay sex more than gay people do.
 
Anathema said:
These people think and talk about gay sex more than gay people do.
Click to expand...


If I had to guess I'd say it's because they are very Chris-like. They believe they must constantly struggle to maintain their straightness, and think that not throwing fits at the thought of a penis is the same as being gay. So they repress every gay thought and only express them in a safe way, by talking constantly about gay sex and how horrible it is.
 
Tim Buckley said:
and there are 9001 articles about homosexuality and homosexual sex.
Click to expand...

Every single one of them written by the same guy. Who also protects the articles and won't let anyone else touch them.

He also doesn't sleep much. (And by that, I don't mean he doesn't get laid. I mean he's been known to edit Conservapedia 48 hours straight. ...okay, the latter probably also implies the former.)
 
Tim Buckley said:
BallsDeep4Cash said:
I thought that it was satire; maybe I was wrong.
Click to expand...

As far as I know its almost immposible to know it, same with any other of their articles.
The article on fucking LIBERALISM for example, is surprisingly tame, and there are 9001 articles about homosexuality and homosexual sex.
Click to expand...

Funnily enough, if you look at the most viewed pages on Conservapedia, the Homogay pages are usually in the top 20.

http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Statistics
http://poesygalore.blogspot.com/2007/11 ... -most.html
 
LordCustos3 said:
Funnily enough, if you look at the most viewed pages on Conservapedia, the Homogay pages are usually in the top 20.
Click to expand...
At some point, someone thought it would be hilarious if they would be highly ranked, so they started running clickbots.

Nowadays, they don't have to. Turns out the pages easily stay in top ranks even without any extra effort.

Xanatos said:
Ladies and gentlemen. . . let me introduce you to a little wiki called Metapedia. A site for those who think Conservapedia is too liberal.
Click to expand...

Isn't that the site about the famous Austrian-born lover of cute little puppies, Adolf Hitler, who only had a simple political dream of getting cute German Shepherd puppies for every family on Earth? Now who would possibly object to that plan, anyway? (Well, aside of people who turn to some more reputable wikis who cover every other aspect of that plan, that is.)
 
That's because a lot of them swear there's a secret gay agenda being put out by liberals. It has to do with brainwashing good conservative youth into eeeeevil liberal gays, or something like that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back