🐱 Conservatives flock to Parler—but its terms of service are just as strict at Twitter’s - “It’s a private business” etc

CatParty

Parler, a self-described anti-censorship social media platform, is growing in popularity among conservatives as an alternative to Twitter.


Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Thursday became Parler’s newest high-profile user and cited alleged political bias among the internet’s most prominent social media sites as his reason for joining.


“These are some of the most visited sites in the world. They’re run by left-wing Silicon Valley billionaires,” Cruz said on Twitter. “They have an unparalleled ability to shape what Americans see and hear and ultimately think. And they use that power to silence conservatives and promote their radical left-wing agenda.”

Parler bills itself as an “unbiased” service “which enables free expression without violence and a lack of censorship.”


Everyone from Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) to popular conservative commentator Dan Bongino have joined the site’s ranks in the past several days, prompted in part by Twitter taking action on President Donald Trump’s tweets.

But is Parler truly the bastion of free speech it claims to be?


That’s the question some are asking. A quick glance at Parler’s user agreement indicates the platform to be just as strict as any other.


For starters, Parler states that it reserves the right to delete any user’s content or entire profile at any time even if the terms of service have not been violated.


The site also explicitly bars the use of language or visuals “that describe or show sexual organs or activity.” Even content that is merely “sexual in nature” is listed as a violation. Likewise, any language or visuals deemed “morbid or degrading” are also prohibited.


Parler further states that it “never shares your personal data” while simultaneously noting that it “may share any information we receive with vendors and service providers.”


Even though platforms generally cannot be held liable for the content their users post under federal law, Parler lets its members know that they could end up footing the bill if the site is sued for something they post.

The Daily Dot reached out to Parler to inquire about its terms of service but did not receive a reply by publication time.


Another prominent user to recently join Parler is Logan Cook, formally known on Twitter as @CarpeDonktum.

Cook, a right-wing meme creator often retweeted by President Donald Trump, was permanently suspended from Twitter on Tuesday.


Conservatives cited the instance as yet another example of Twitter’s political bias. A Twitter spokesperson confirmed to the Daily Dot at the time that Cook’s removal was linked to a history of frequent copyright abuses.

While Cook has found a new home on Parler, the social media site also explicitly states that it will enforce copyright laws. Although Cook has argued that his creations are exempt due to fair use, it remains unclear how Parler will react to takedown notices.

Given its infancy, only time will tell whether Parler is able to fulfill its promise and bring users the free speech mecca they’re hoping for.
 
For starters, Parler states that it reserves the right to delete any user’s content or entire profile at any time even if the terms of service have not been violated.

All sites do that. Twitter, Instagram and Facebook are the biggest culprits. It seems Parler is just being honest about it. Next.

The site also explicitly bars the use of language or visuals “that describe or show sexual organs or activity.” Even content that is merely “sexual in nature” is listed as a violation. Likewise, any language or visuals deemed “morbid or degrading” are also prohibited.

Soooooo no porn or swearing? Wow this really is a conservative platform. 🚬 Next.

Parler further states that it “never shares your personal data” while simultaneously noting that it “may share any information we receive with vendors and service providers.”

Again all sites do that. Adblocker and others like it screw with ad revenue and they have to make it up somehow. What else?

Even though platforms generally cannot be held liable for the content their users post under federal law, Parler lets its members know that they could end up footing the bill if the site is sued for something they post.

They probably shouldn't have admitted that, any chance to get free money for stupid shit is a chance taken by anyone desperate enough. Isn't this what the 230 thing is about? Didn't someone try doing that to Twitter already?

So the big takeaway I'm seeing is that Parler won't let you curse or post naughty bits which is a dealbreaker for many who won't admit it. (That's what's killing tumblr and what's plaguing twitter along with manipulated trends and kpop fags) Maybe they'll change their policy if they get more members?
 
They probably shouldn't have admitted that, any chance to get free money for stupid shit is a chance taken by anyone desperate enough. Isn't this what the 230 thing is about? Didn't someone try doing that to Twitter already?
Yeah they’re just ignoring 230. If they weren’t stupid they’d embrace 230
 
The issue with Facebook/Twitter/Youtube is that they don't enforce the rules evenly, the will allow and even endorse TOS violating content if its from "the right side", Call for genocide of whites? You're okay, call for the genocide of Blacks/jews/ect you are banned quicker then you can blink.
 
First off, “Parler” is a really dumb name because I get the idea that it’s supposed to be pronounced “parlay” like in French but everyone is just gonna pronounce it “parlor” because that’s what it looks like. Parlé would make a much better name because it’s immediately obvious as to how it’s supposed to be pronounced for anyone who took a middle school French/Spanish class, and because accents are cool.

Second, this shit will NEVER overtake Twitter. I believe it was our own dear and now departed leader who posited that any platform whose only pitch is being a “free speech” alternative to an existing platform will inevitably be populated almost entirely by actual eno-nazi’s and far-right nut jobs because they offer nothing of value to normies over existing platforms.
 
This reads like a hit piece directed at anyone who's never read a TOS in full (everyone).

The no porn thing is going to be a massive deal breaker. It's like a fraction of a fraction of a fraction who gets into political shit fights on Twitter. A lot more people are just there to follow artists after Tumblr shit the bed
If that means Twitter officially becomes the Tumblr containment zone then more power to them. I poke my head into the KF Pleroma instance every once in a while and I swear it's 90% porn.
 
The terms of service don't mean shit when companies arbitrarily decide what counts as infraction and what's not. Unless the author can give actual example of unfair treatment then the equivalence to Twitter is pointless.
Exactly this. Rules only matter if they're enforced. Twitter has shown many, many times that rules don't matter as much as who is breaking them. Black people, feminists, leftists of various kinds, can say whatever they like with near-impunity, while conservatives are held to a much higher standard. Rules are the same, enforcement isn't. Fuck Twitter. Fuck Jack.

I wish Trump would ditch twitter and go there, so twitter would die, but he's too much of an egotist.
The thing is, if Trump did leave Twitter and joined another site, thousands of people would be forced to follow him. How many journalists built their careers around reporting on what he posts? How many people hang on every post he makes so they can jump in with some snotty quip? They live to hate him. They can't live without him. Trump is too big and outrageous to just ignore.
 
The problem isn't tits. No one except Sargon was banned for porn, and Sargon was a fucking moron about it.

The problem is "hateful conduct" or whatever. We should be able to harass each other, harassment is normal and part of life. You can't argue without some inflections of abuse or anger getting in there.
 
Exactly this. Rules only matter if they're enforced. Twitter has shown many, many times that rules don't matter as much as who is breaking them. Black people, feminists, leftists of various kinds, can say whatever they like with near-impunity, while conservatives are held to a much higher standard. Rules are the same, enforcement isn't. Fuck Twitter. Fuck Jack.


The thing is, if Trump did leave Twitter and joined another site, thousands of people would be forced to follow him. How many journalists built their careers around reporting on what he posts? How many people hang on every post he makes so they can jump in with some snotty quip? They live to hate him. They can't live without him. Trump is too big and outrageous to just ignore.

The Secret Service would be fully capable of running a Fediverse service for him, and if the current software is not good enough, I'm sure they could enlist people to fix it.
 
The terms of service don't mean shit when companies arbitrarily decide what counts as infraction and what's not. Unless the author can give actual example of unfair treatment then the equivalence to Twitter is pointless.
See, that's the thing. I don't really like any form of "YOU CAN'T SAY THAT", but if a site at least applies the rule to EVERYONE it's much fairer and easier to respect, censorship or no. The shit I see stay up on Twitter is ridiculous compared to what gets pulled down and it's clearly done on political lines. If everyone gets told to STFU when they post off-color stuff rather than just anyone to the right of Mao, they're being consistent with their rules and I can grudgingly respect that.
 
The problem isn't tits. No one except Sargon was banned for porn, and Sargon was a fucking moron about it.

The problem is "hateful conduct" or whatever. We should be able to harass each other, harassment is normal and part of life. You can't argue without some inflections of abuse or anger getting in there.
I don’t think porn’s a direct problem per sé, but if Tumblr and Twitter is any indication, it’s a huge draw to the subset of people who join a platform for that express purpose. What I’m getting from his post is that he probably thinks this platform isn’t going anywhere without any sort of secondary pull.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: rotollo
I want to add that the second worse thing about modern social media is that it encourages passive aggressiveness. People should be free to call others every curse word under the sun, otherwise the social media is infested by pussies who make veiled insults with the expectation the other side will say actual insults and get punished for it.
 
Back