🐱 Conservatives flock to Parler—but its terms of service are just as strict at Twitter’s - “It’s a private business” etc

CatParty

Parler, a self-described anti-censorship social media platform, is growing in popularity among conservatives as an alternative to Twitter.


Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) on Thursday became Parler’s newest high-profile user and cited alleged political bias among the internet’s most prominent social media sites as his reason for joining.


“These are some of the most visited sites in the world. They’re run by left-wing Silicon Valley billionaires,” Cruz said on Twitter. “They have an unparalleled ability to shape what Americans see and hear and ultimately think. And they use that power to silence conservatives and promote their radical left-wing agenda.”

Parler bills itself as an “unbiased” service “which enables free expression without violence and a lack of censorship.”


Everyone from Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) to popular conservative commentator Dan Bongino have joined the site’s ranks in the past several days, prompted in part by Twitter taking action on President Donald Trump’s tweets.

But is Parler truly the bastion of free speech it claims to be?


That’s the question some are asking. A quick glance at Parler’s user agreement indicates the platform to be just as strict as any other.


For starters, Parler states that it reserves the right to delete any user’s content or entire profile at any time even if the terms of service have not been violated.


The site also explicitly bars the use of language or visuals “that describe or show sexual organs or activity.” Even content that is merely “sexual in nature” is listed as a violation. Likewise, any language or visuals deemed “morbid or degrading” are also prohibited.


Parler further states that it “never shares your personal data” while simultaneously noting that it “may share any information we receive with vendors and service providers.”


Even though platforms generally cannot be held liable for the content their users post under federal law, Parler lets its members know that they could end up footing the bill if the site is sued for something they post.

The Daily Dot reached out to Parler to inquire about its terms of service but did not receive a reply by publication time.


Another prominent user to recently join Parler is Logan Cook, formally known on Twitter as @CarpeDonktum.

Cook, a right-wing meme creator often retweeted by President Donald Trump, was permanently suspended from Twitter on Tuesday.


Conservatives cited the instance as yet another example of Twitter’s political bias. A Twitter spokesperson confirmed to the Daily Dot at the time that Cook’s removal was linked to a history of frequent copyright abuses.

While Cook has found a new home on Parler, the social media site also explicitly states that it will enforce copyright laws. Although Cook has argued that his creations are exempt due to fair use, it remains unclear how Parler will react to takedown notices.

Given its infancy, only time will tell whether Parler is able to fulfill its promise and bring users the free speech mecca they’re hoping for.
 
Not getting my hopes up. All this looks like is a kosher Gab. And what did Gab do to solve censorship of conservatives online? Jack fucking shit.
The real reason to join Parler is to terrorize conservaboomers with racial slurs. FFS these people haven't seen an A Wyatt Mann comic before, they're ripe for the picking!
 
First off, “Parler” is a really dumb name because I get the idea that it’s supposed to be pronounced “parlay” like in French but everyone is just gonna pronounce it “parlor” because that’s what it looks like. Parlé would make a much better name because it’s immediately obvious as to how it’s supposed to be pronounced for anyone who took a middle school French/Spanish class, and because accents are cool.

The point with all these platforms is to create a brand name that's distinctive and also uniquely spelled so you don't get buried in search engines.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: greengrilledcheese

500,000 people created accounts on the social media platform Parler after Twitter banned two conservative accounts Tuesday.

Parler’s user base increased by 50% this week, bringing the total number of users to over 1.5 million, Mediaite reported Thursday.

The surge comes after Twitter permanently banned the account of Carpe Donktum, and locked the account of The National Pulse Editor-In-Chief Raheem Kassam. Both accounts, which were locked Tuesday, have over 200,000 followers.

Conservatives, who were already frustrated with Twitter for what they say is arbitrary and unfair banning of right-wing accounts, flocked to Parler after the two accounts were suspended. Republican Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and Republican Florida Rep. Matt Gaetz both joined the platform.


“The left wants to defund the actual police,” Gaetz said in his first post on Parler. “I would just like to defund the thought police in Silicon Valley.”

Parler, which brands itself as the free speech alternative to Twitter, does restrict certain content, but the platform uses broadcast standards, which censors things like pornography but not political speech, according to Mediaite.

Conservatives first started joining Parler when the site was created in 2018. Parler co-founder and CEO John Matze said in 2018 that “big tech is not too big to topple, in fact, they are blinded by their size/power and are hurting themselves by ideologically targeting groups.”
 
I tried setting up an account there and the page frooze. But only way this platform will grow is if Trump abandons Twitter for Parlor.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ditto
Never heard of Parler until just now
It's been getting shilled hard in boomer conservative circles like Gab was, especially because a few actual politicians have announced they're using it. This has given it media attention few "alternative social media sites" get. It's also been attacked by the usual hit pieces from the media (from Newsweek to some no name site literally run by never trump cons) since it's had a few edgelords/fedposters sign up along with Laura "my tires got slashed" Loomer (thread here), who has become the media's scrapegoat.

It just screams dumpster fire in the making.
 
Literally just Candid again, astroturfing and all. Here's two snippets from their ToS I saw floated around on Twitter, which can be found here and here respectively:
parl.jpgparl2.png
Anyone who signs up for this shit is a rube, and the fact that actual political figures are shilling something with this kind of language is straight up disgusting. I should note that the SSN collection is mandatory for verifying "influencers", at least if I'm reading their dogshit privacy policy correctly.
 
So far, Parler looks to be more of a success than Gab.
t's been getting shilled hard in boomer conservative circles like Gab was, especially because a few actual politicians have announced they're using it. This has given it media attention few "alternative social media sites" get. It's also been attacked by the usual hit pieces from the media (from Newsweek to some no name site) since it's had a few edgelords/fedposters sign up along with Laura "my tires got slashed" Loomer (thread here), who has become the media's scrapegoat.
Given how many right wingers conduct themselves online, I predict a Trump circlejerk with blatant racism and edginess sprinkled in.

This shall be fun to see.
 
So far, Parler looks to be more of a success than Gab.

Given how many right wingers conduct themselves online, I predict a Trump circlejerk with blatant racism and edginess sprinkled in.

This shall be fun to see.
Have you been to Twitter lately? There's not a lot of polite discourse from the leftists there, either.
 
No Twitter alternative will really take off unless all the normies get fed up with Twitter. The first people to flock to these alternatives are the ones who are "too extreme" for Twitter. The user base becomes made up of mostly people like this so when your average person sees it full of people posting about the "jews" and what not, they are just gonna avoid it.
 
No Twitter alternative will really take off unless all the normies get fed up with Twitter. The first people to flock to these alternatives are the ones who are "too extreme" for Twitter. The user base becomes made up of mostly people like this so when your average person sees it full of people posting about the "jews" and what not, they are just gonna avoid it.
It'll be a cycle. It'll take off because it's not like Twitter, it'll get users and become just like Twitter or worse than it, and it won't die off until people move to the next new thing. Just look at Discord now and how that went. In 2016 everyone was pushing for Discord, now Discord is associated with that cub porn mod and banning everyone.
 
Have you been to Twitter lately? There's not a lot of polite discourse from the leftists there, either.
I'm not saying Twitter doesn't; I'm saying it'll be like Twitter in reverse.

Also, said behavior will isolate new, "normie" users as they don't want to be associated with the extreme prejudice they would bring being unfiltered.
 
Everyone's comparing it to Gab and I'm optimistic for another Nehlen and Ricky situation.
 
Back