Disaster Count Dankula found guilty of hate crimes - Next time you think about making a harmless youtube video, go outside and rape 1,200 kids instead

  • Thread starter Thread starter HG 400
  • Start date Start date
upload_2018-3-20_23-39-47.png

http://www.breitbart.com/london/201...d-guilty-in-shtposting-case-by-british-court/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/section/127

(2) A person is guilty of an offence if, for the purpose of causing annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety to another, he—
(a) sends by means of a public electronic communications network, a message that he knows to be false,
(b) causes such a message to be sent; or
(c) persistently makes use of a public electronic communications network.
Hold on... so shitposting/trolling users is illegal to brits on here? "Ha ha Null likes poop" would be illegal if I were in the UK?
 
Reminder that this isn't the first time someones been dragged through a long protracted court case in the UK because of "Hate Crimes" which clearly at the time were more of a joke than anything serious.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-19009344

Chambers eventually won an appeal, but not after two years of a drawn out court case after he jokingly suggested he would blow up an airport - that was with a lot of the UK celeb twitter backing him as well.

A while ago when I was doing CompSci classes this came up when discussing computer use laws, and the fact we even needed to discuss whether it was necessary speaks volumes about the state of the UK citizenry
 
What's wrong with protesting for a good cause?

There's nothing wrong with protesting for a good cause. Being a fat autistic smug faggot who thinks he's the last best hope of western civilisation despite being such a dumb stuttering cuck that he managed to lose a fucking debate to Richard fucking Spencer and then fatly plopping around with his wife's son and blocking up streets like a stupid bitch isn't the same as 'protesting for a good cause'.
 
There's nothing wrong with protesting for a good cause. Being a fat autistic smug faggot who thinks he's the last best hope of western civilisation despite being such a dumb stuttering cuck that he managed to lose a fucking debate to Richard fucking Spencer and then fatly plopping around with your wife's son and blocking up streets like a stupid bitch isn't the same as 'protesting for a good cause'.

This. Many, MANY protests for good causes have been either derailed or completely de-legitimized due to the loudest voices in the protest. Sargon getting involved will just make the whole thing look retarded to reasonable people.

See also: Occupy Wall Street (where anger over a lack of finance reform in the wake of the Great Recession was derailed by upper middle-class communists and progressive identity politicians) and Black Lives matter (where anger over extremely trigger-happy cops was derailed by the same people as well as Kangz).
 
Im torn between wanting to accept my shitposter brothers and sisters as refugees and laughing as they rot in the totalitarian shithole they most likely voted for and supported because "muh progressivism."

In Canada, this was snuck into the charter while the entirety of the country was looking away due to a political debate over regionalism. Probably the same case with the UK.
 
this is why the nazis won btw

can't even fucking joke about them lest it's a "hate crime".

by trying to censor people from making light of nazis, you give the nazis power.

this is literally the exact opposite of what you're supposed to do, Scotland, you fucking nazis
 
It's funny (read: fucking sad) how diluted the concept of "hate speech" is, nowadays. Some dude teaches a dog to respond to a Nazi salute as a joke and he, himself, is considered a Nazi. How's that hate speech? Is the dog trained to kill people of a particular ethnicity? Is the man rallying a group of insurgents to attack a certain group of people? Is the dude atop a soapbox proclaiming his hate and "final solution" to the problem of X group? With this action they are basically denying history and the cultural impact of the events during the Nazi era in Europe. Nazis existed, a LOT of people died either fighting or defending them and now we are condemning someone for simply acknowledging they existed by BANNING their ways, even when it's used to mock them.

Those who forget (aka: censor) the past are doomed to repeat it.
 
Last edited:
Back