I will say this. If they're not from a copycat, then we almost certainly know the Ripper's true identity:
Charles Allen Lechmere.
It's suspicious that Charles Lechmere gave a false name.
Lechmere is the latest fad Ripper culprit and all the "evidence" is working backwards from the conclusion he's the killer.
"The crime happened along his routes!!!", nigger he's a guy that lived and worked in the East End, of course you can bullshit together any number of
potential paths between his residence and workplace that brush where the bodies were found. The whole take is insidious as hell.
Then there's meme falsehoods about there being bodyparts under his or his mother's house after it was demolished or sth. The most "suspicious" thing he did was give his stepfather's surname (Cross) at his official testimony, but he could've just as well done that for completely benign reasons:
- His stepfather was a policeman so he just used his name for clout in an official police investigation.
- Or there was some stupid clerical happenstance where he was registered as Cross in some places and the use of that name was more appropriate.
- Or he didn't want his real name in the papers associated with (dead) prostitutes, in case his wife flips out thinking he was whoring.
- Or he was nervous and said the wrong name while giving testimony.
There's any number of explanations why he could've done that.
He still gave his proper address to the police and showed up to the hearing, completely defeating the point of giving a false identity.
Yes, he was married btw. And at the time he found the body he already had
8 children with his wife. Textbook profile of a whore slaying brainrotted madman. Smooth as silk, being able to murder bitches in the dead of night, then come home covered in blood and guts without the 9 people living in his household noticing. Him being treated as a legitimate suspect is retarded.