Cyberpunk 2077 Grieving Thread

[Mike Hunt]

Welp, RPS has seen the 50 minute behind closed doors demo (which will be released to us normies in August, apparently), and have done GARME JURNALIZM on it:



He was seriously triggered by the fact that he, a white man, were shooting at a bunch of black guys subtitled "animal." He also didn't like that the PC could be waycist by mocking their accent. I get the impression that was his main criticism, his scoffing at bad shootiness seems tacked on.

Also, lol @ the whole "they're trying to subvert expectations" thing. Deary me.

Twatter Transgenders are also losing their shit at the soft drink that is advertised by an obvious dickgirl. Some of them are trying to claim cultural appropriation:

View attachment 797022

the trans ad controversy is the dumbest controversy since tifa's breast size. In a world where body modification is common place of course transexuals would be more common, and in that world they'll be pandered and objectified in advertisements just like everyone else. companies exploit gay pride CONSTANTLY, why would it be any different in a world rife with them?

The irony here is that claiming that "girlbulge is one of our most precious resources" means that those troons who subscribe to that thinking aren't experiencing dysphoria. A true and honest transgender person would feel bad about having a dick and would want it to be lopped off. This means that in a cyberpunk world full of easily-affordable body mods, there actually won't be "girlbulges" in such a setting, assuming all trans people in that world are true and honest, of course.

 

[Your Weird Fetish]

To nobody's surprise, the ree-ing continues
View attachment 797661
Archive
View attachment 797663
Archive

OK but how do you represent trannies without showing a bulge. Then (in cyberpunk's case, not real life cause we know none of them pass) it's just a regular woman and they REE about no representation. These guys are so exceptional. This falls into the loop of: Showing an obvious trans person is fetishization, not showing an obvious trans person is erasure, any attempt to show a trans person is never enough.

Also lmfao at the cannibalism over the dumbest shit in the replies:
View attachment 797667
Archive 1
Archive 2

I'm not going to continue posting about trannies being mad about the game because then the entire thread will be that instead of the actual game. It's just annoying seeing this shit show up on my feed when the game clearly isn't for these people

lol American tranny is so close minded and bigoted he thinks "Projekt" is just an edgy misspelling of Project. Priceless.

 

[Scarlett Johansson]

Could be worse. ScarJo got death threats for Ghost in the Shell.

What exactly did CD Projekt Red say? Did they jokingly tweet something? Shitpost?

Wait....its just that ad? How is it either catering to trans/queer or insulting them?

 

[Agent of Z.O.G.]

Also, really enemies health slowly ticking down, asshole it's a goddamn RPG not fucking Doom or Wolfenstein, the fuck was he expecting? Hell, even in Deus Ex games enemies took damage and didn't die right away.

Just because it's typical for RPGs to have shit gameplay doesn't make it okay.

Man I really want to support cyberpunk(not even pre-ordering or even buying it but just saying good things about it), to own the troons(even got some of those in some shadowrun discord I am a part of, it really feels like trannies are a hive mind) but the gameplay just looks like a bland amalgamation of AAA tropes and it doesn't look like they're changing it all that much.

 

[The tired cat]

Just because it's typical for RPGs to have shit gameplay doesn't make it okay.

Man I really want to support cyberpunk(not even pre-ordering or even buying it but just saying good things about it), to own the troons(even got some of those in some shadowrun discord I am a part of, it really feels like trannies are a hive mind) but the gameplay just looks like a bland amalgamation of AAA tropes and it doesn't look like they're changing it all that much.

Because they REALLY changed a lot when it came to the Witcher games, right? Hell, can I just ask what are you expecting them to change, specially for a Cyberpunk setting that has been done by others or even say an action RPG? If they make the combat say like...Doom or Borderlands people will bitch how it doesn't feel like an RPG, if they say do it like New Vegas or Deus Ex you get idiots bitching how it's too boring. Oh and wanting to "support the game" to just own a specific group, ya congrats on reaching a whole new level of petty, ya know how SJW's wanna "support" woke shit.

 

[Your Weird Fetish]

The Witcher 1 is a good game complete with slav jank. Git gud.

 

[ExtremelyWokeAnimeTitty]

He was seriously triggered by the fact that he, a white man, were shooting at a bunch of black guys subtitled "animal." He also didn't like that the PC could be waycist by mocking their accent. I get the impression that was his main criticism, his scoffing at bad shootiness seems tacked on.

This is really suspicious. I highly doubt they just made an all-black gang called "the animals" especially given POLYGON of all sites didn't bat an eye. I assume it's just a multi-racial gang.

 

[Pumpkin Girl IRL]

They're having the same issue as the Division did. Your enemy group is obviously multi-ethnic, but as minorities are included that means the group is entirely comprised of them. Or something.

The Division was especially funny, because later on in the game's life a lot of enemies were made more visually diverse with their equipment which meant the multiple skin tones were far more visible rather than being reduced to fingers or a line around the eyes due to face wear. The complaints quickly switched to how this proved everyone right because white people had suddenly been patched in!!!!

Same with ass creed. Unity has no playable women, this is wrong, Syndicate adds women and suddenly its glorifying misogynistic violence. Fffffuck off.

 

[faint horizons]

This is really suspicious. I highly doubt they just made an all-black gang called "the animals" especially given POLYGON of all sites didn't bat an eye. I assume it's just a multi-racial gang.

Like all 'SJWs', they only noticed the black people being shot and realized, 'oh wait, it's a bunch of other people being shot'. Besides, in real life race matters in ILLEGAL GANGS. I highly doubt V's waving the KKK banner with white hood and all and screaming '1488'.

Jesus, what next? A gay multinational mob? I have never seen white guys in the Crips or black guys in MS13. The bottom line is that they're gangsters. The context matters. Well, except if you're killing hordes of white people. Then it's justified.

 

[The tired cat]

They're having the same issue as the Division did. Your enemy group is obviously multi-ethnic, but as minorities are included that means the group is entirely comprised of them. Or something.

The Division was especially funny, because later on in the game's life a lot of enemies were made more visually diverse with their equipment which meant the multiple skin tones were far more visible rather than being reduced to fingers or a line around the eyes due to face wear. The complaints quickly switched to how this proved everyone right because white people had suddenly been patched in!!!!

Same with ass creed. Unity has no playable women, this is wrong, Syndicate adds women and suddenly its glorifying misogynistic violence. Fffffuck off.

I'm kinda surprised they didn't lose their shit with Liberation, where ya play a black chick and need to disguise yourself as a slave to blend in better.

 

[Agent of Z.O.G.]

Hell, can I just ask what are you expecting them to change, specially for a Cyberpunk setting that has been done by others or even say an action RPG?

Just remove the enemy levels. It was shit in Witcher and it will be shit here if it's the same "enemy 5 levels below you dies instantly while an enemy 5 levels above you is invincible" deal.

If they make the combat say like...Doom or Borderlands people will bitch how it doesn't feel like an RPG, if they say do it like New Vegas or Deus Ex you get idiots bitching how it's too boring

It sounds like you have little idea of what you're talking about if you conflate Doom with Borderlands and think people will bitch about it not being an RPG if the gameplay isn't shit.

Oh and wanting to "support the game" to just own a specific group, ya congrats on reaching a whole new level of petty, ya know how SJW's wanna "support" woke shit.

It's mostly about wanting the game to be good, which most likely won't happen.

 

[The tired cat]

Just remove the enemy levels. It was shit in Witcher and it will be shit here if it's the same "enemy 5 levels below you dies instantly while an enemy 5 levels above you is invincible" deal.

Okay game expert, nice to hear your bottomless expert opinion.

It sounds like you have little idea of what you're talking about if you conflate Doom with Borderlands and think people will bitch about it not being an RPG if the gameplay isn't shit.

Yes they will complain, if you think they won't. Then I'd say you don't know what you're talking.

It's mostly about wanting the game to be good, which most likely won't happen.

Okay, well didn't know you had psychic powers to predict the future. Combined, you're the asshole who so called "support" for the game isn't buying it or pre-ordering it, just giving it praise so you can "stick it to them troons". Yeah, you my dear friend are full of shit on the "wanting the game to be good" part.

 

[gay]

This is really suspicious. I highly doubt they just made an all-black gang called "the animals" especially given POLYGON of all sites didn't bat an eye. I assume it's just a multi-racial gang.

the animals are "mixed, mostly not black" according to the RPS article, but "gunning down mostly white people, and some blacks" wouldn't fit the narrative if you wanted to call the game a white supremacist fantasy.

 

[Agent of Z.O.G.]

Yes they will complain, if you think they won't. Then I'd say you don't know what you're talking.

Literally who will complain about shit gameplay. I go to RPGcodex which is very autistic and I don't see them asking for bad gameplay in an FPS RPG thing. They want everything to be turn based but that's different.

Okay, well didn't know you had psychic powers to predict the future.

I have eyes and I watched the gameplay trailer. Nothing shown there looked good.

 

[WhoIsSutterKane]

 

[Your Weird Fetish]

Just remove the enemy levels. It was shit in Witcher and it will be shit here if it's the same "enemy 5 levels below you dies instantly while an enemy 5 levels above you is invincible" deal.

That was total bullshit and part of why the open world was the weakest component of Witcher 3.

 

[The tired cat]

Literally who will complain about shit gameplay. I go to RPGcodex which is very autistic and I don't see them asking for bad gameplay in an FPS RPG thing. They want everything to be turn based but that's different.

So, your example is a forum, where they mostly wank off to turn based shit. You know, people who probably wouldn't even give a rats ass for an FPS RPG.

I have eyes and I watched the gameplay trailer. Nothing shown there looked good.

Again, you're a guy who never really cared for the game. Mostly just wanted to use it as your "take dat troons!" bullshit, you know how woke motherfuckers never really give a shit for any piece of media. But pretend to care because "it sticks to the group we dun likey!". So, really I'd say your opinion on the whole game is about jack fucking shit.

That was total bullshit and part of why the open world was the weakest component of Witcher 3.

So, here's a fun question. In an open world RPG like say Witcher 3 or this game, how does one determine if the player is going up against tougher enemies? Remove the level system, an thus you just have guys who somehow can suck up more damage and you get players pissed and call 'em "bullet spongy", because they didn't die after getting two clips worth in the head. Make all the enemies more balanced, the game becomes a more open world FPS with the RPG stuff feeling more tacked on, like say Far Cry 3 where all your upgrades gave you small bonuses like carrying more grenades, getting more XP for kills an etc.

 

[Your Weird Fetish]

So, here's a fun question. In an open world RPG like say Witcher 3 or this game, how does one determine if the player is going up against tougher enemies? Remove the level system, an thus you just have guys who somehow can suck up more damage and you get players pissed and call 'em "bullet spongy", because they didn't die after getting two clips worth in the head. Make all the enemies more balanced, the game becomes a more open world FPS with the RPG stuff feeling more tacked on, like say Far Cry 3 where all your upgrades gave you small bonuses like carrying more grenades, getting more XP for kills an etc.

Morrowind style soft level scaling is the answer. A drowner in Skellige should not be tougher than a fiend in Velen.

 

[The tired cat]

Morrowind style soft level scaling is the answer. A drowner in Skellige should not be tougher than a fiend in Velen.

Really, Morrowind is your answer? A game that somehow felt more broken than Skyrim.

 

[DoofComoose]

If it's similar to Deus Ex then I don't really care if the gameplay is a bit bulletspongey as long as it has some depth. Witcher 3's combat wasn't great but it wasn't really bad either, it was just kind of there. Even if the shooting isn't good, like it wasn't in the original Deus Ex, as long as they make the world worth exploring, multiple paths and ways to go about a mission. That's the type of thing that gets me going.

Also we need to have a useless swimming stat for me to pour all my points in. That's the most important part.