US Daily Mail: Oregon SLAMMED for rising euthanasia rates, with out-of-state 'death tourists' adding to the 431 people who got lethal scripts in 2022 - Record numbers ended their lives under Oregon's assisted-dying scheme

Source: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...tes-death-tourists-adding-431-tally-2022.html
Archive: https://archive.is/qgTy5

'Churning people through the assisted suicide machine': Oregon SLAMMED for rising euthanasia rates, with out-of-state 'death tourists' adding to the 431 people who got lethal scripts in 2022​

Record numbers of people ended their lives in Oregon last year in America's most advanced doctor-assisted suicide program, which now lets out-of-state 'death tourists' get lethal drug cocktails on the West Coast.

Last year, 431 people received fatal prescriptions under the state's Death With Dignity Act (DWDA), and 278 people used them to end their lives, Oregon Health Authority said in its annual report.

That's a jump from 383 scripts and 238 deaths the previous year.

The 19-page report is the first time Oregon has recorded the non-residents who travelled to end their lives on the West Coast, under last year's controversial expansion of the scheme.

Officially, three out-of-staters ended their lives in Oregon last year.

But officials say the real number could be much higher, as doctors do not have to record a patients' residency status before inking their scripts.

1678918368791.png1678918395122.png

The new numbers come amid growing concerns that Oregon and other US states are liberalizing their assisted-suicide programs too quickly and following the example of Canada, where tens of thousands of people are euthanized each year.

Lois Anderson, executive director of Oregon Right to Life, a campaign group, said doctors were increasingly writing fatal scripts for patients they had known in some cases for only a few days.

'The physicians providing these deadly prescriptions hardly know their patients and are often abandoning them in the last moments of their lives,' said Anderson.

'They have increasingly become absent even when the lethal drugs are ingested. That's not care. That's churning people through the 'Death with Dignity' machine.'

Oregon's assisted suicide program is available to adults who have a terminal illness and less than six months to live. In 2022, most of those who ended their lives were white people aged over 65 suffering from cancer, heart disease or brain disease.

Supporters of assisted suicide schemes say they help some desperately sick people end their suffering. Critics say they devalue human life and make death a solution for the infirm, disabled and even those who are cash-strapped or feel like a burden.

Oregon's report lists the reasons driving people to end their lives.

Most of the scheme's users said their condition was making life 'less enjoyable,' that they were 'losing autonomy' or suffering a 'loss of dignity' — which is often the result of no longer being able to clean or care for oneself.

Only about a third of beneficiaries said they were worried about a lack of 'pain control.' A worrying 17 patients said they were ending their lives because they were worried about medical bills piling up.

Oregon became the first US state to allow physician-assisted suicide in 1997, allowing terminally ill adult Oregonians, with less than six months left to live, to ask doctors for a fatal dose of drugs they then administer themselves, typically at home.

Last year, it became the first US state to move to allow non-residents to travel to the West Coast state to end their lives.

1678918471910.pngThat came about by Dr Nicholas Gideonse in 2021 suing Oregon, challenging the constitutionality of DWDA's residency restriction, with support from Compassion & Choices, which leads the US campaign to expand access to assisted suicide.

Oregon health chiefs in 2022 settled the case and agreed to lift the residency rule, but the state's legislature only began considering the repeal this session through House Bill 2279, which looks set to pass in the Democrat-led chamber.

Dr Gideonse last year publicly acknowledged that he had started accepting out-of-state patients wishing to end their lives in Oregon, including a Texas-based man suffering from Lou Gehrig's disease and a hospice patient on the East Coast

It's not clear whether Dr Gideonse's patients were among the three identified in the report.

Out-of-state residents must be able to spend at least 15 days in Oregon to process the paperwork, which requires sign-offs from two doctors and witnesses, before administering the fatal dose themselves, says the clinic's website.

Dr Gideonse and the center he directs, End of Life Choices Oregon, did not answer DailyMail.com's requests for comment. Oregon Health & Science University, where he also works, would not confirm whether it facilitated assisted suicides for out-of-staters.

America's first 'death tourism' destination throws up tough legal questions for family members who may help a loved one reach Oregon from a prohibitionist state. They could face arrest or even be prosecuted in their home state as a result.

DailyMail.com asked the office of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Republican, whether it was investigating the case of the Texan resident. A spokesperson said they were 'unable to provide a comment at this time.'

For critics, Oregon's nascent 'death tourism' industry, and efforts to create another in Vermont, show how the US is on a slippery slope to following in Canada's footsteps — where lax rules have allowed people with so little as hearing loss to be euthanized.
 
Big ups to the 53 people who got the prescription and thought "Nah, fuck it." I hope they're feeling better now.

Anyone who thinks this is a good idea is historically illiterate, hopelessly naive and possibly retarded. Oregon is a failed state and now they've given themselves the power to kill people instead of governing worth a damn.
It's highly likely that, since they were terminal, they died naturally before taking the drugs.
So are these people who are just depressed, or are these all people with confirmed fatal illnesses? Cause if it's the later I don't see the problem, other than a possible increase in fatal illnesses.
It's for terminal illness: https://www.oregon.gov/oha/ph/provi...nresearch/deathwithdignityact/pages/faqs.aspx
 
So are these people who are just depressed, or are these all people with confirmed fatal illnesses? Cause if it's the later I don't see the problem, other than a possible increase in fatal illnesses.
If someone's in hospice, and they would prefer to go out quickly, I think they should have that choice.

If someone is just "going through a phase" where they're thinking about killing themselves, and is likely to change their mind in a few days to months, I don't think they should get a helping hand.

I see these two groups as distinct.
 
It's highly likely that, since they were terminal, they died naturally before taking the drugs.

It's for terminal illness: https://www.oregon.gov/oha/ph/provi...nresearch/deathwithdignityact/pages/faqs.aspx

If someone's in hospice, and they would prefer to go out quickly, I think they should have that choice.

If someone is just "going through a phase" where they're thinking about killing themselves, and is likely to change their mind in a few days to months, I don't think they should get a helping hand.

I see these two groups as distinct.
Sounds like the only people getting assisted suicide in Oregon are people in hospice.

Lord only knows all the conditions I've seen discussed in tard baby that even doctors would seek assisted suicide if they were diagnosed (like glioblastoma).
 
Sounds like the only people getting assisted suicide in Oregon are people in hospice.

Lord only knows all the conditions I've seen discussed in tard baby that even doctors would seek assisted suicide if they were diagnosed (like glioblastoma).
Yeah, I replied because I got excited that someone shared that view.

PL but I've known a man who couldn't digest food anymore and in hospice they forced him to starve to death.
 
Great if this keeps up then Sasquatch may lose the spotlight.
 
Yeah, I replied because I got excited that someone shared that view.

PL but I've known a man who couldn't digest food anymore and in hospice they forced him to starve to death.
Yeah sometimes death is a mercy compared to lingering. Many diseases are not kind.
 
More dead Oregonians can only be a good thing. I see no issue with this.

Semi-joking aside, I’m for assisted suicide if someone is terminally ill, in a great deal of pain and just wants to end it. They have my sympathy. Wanting to off yourself because “waaa waaa! I’m so sad because reasons!” needs a reality check.
 
More dead Oregonians can only be a good thing. I see no issue with this.

Semi-joking aside, I’m for assisted suicide if someone is terminally ill, in a great deal of pain and just wants to end it. They have my sympathy. Wanting to off yourself because “waaa waaa! I’m so sad because reasons!” needs a reality check.
Which is why Canada is so fucked up.
 
Cause they legalized hard drugs and instead of jail time, they issue fines


. They've essentially just created a drug tax to pay themselves when they catch a crackhead causing problem's. They're supposed to put in money to boost their detox and shooting galleries but they lack the infrastructure or desire to put much into this because its more important to mitigate a problem than fix it.

All those billions of dollars California spent on solving the homeless problem? Was just to set up a beauracracy to take advantage of a huge ass slush fund. Same thing will happen in Oregon.
The problem is that activism became a large, money-making enterprise. Most of these 'socialist movements' or 'gibs' are actually just funds to pay government officials and employees.

Its like, 'how can you spend billions on the homeless problem and still have homeless?' Well,. the obvious answer is the money isn't going to the homeless. Its going to officials and 'committees' and 'pilot programs' so small to be insignificant. Keeping people poor and homeless is keeping them weak and dependent on the state (like, just barely. If you could call living on skid row living). It keeps everyone else afraid of being homeless, because they look at all the money the state is spending and problems just increase, so people know to keep working.

The United States is not a government that cares about its people. Its social support networks, despite all the claims of 'gibs', are extremely weak and flimsy and have huge hoops to jump through. Even then, its just barely enough for sustainable first world living. We don't care about the poor, and we certainly don't care about the working poor, or the acute homeless. Nobody who has a drug problem or a severe mental illness or is a violent felon should ever be homeless. Yet people are.

The antipathy of our leaders, so-called activists and the state itself is appalling. Protests will step over scores of homeless and drug addicts and closed small businesses and scream about universal bathrooms. They'll look over a housing and banking crisis to throw canned beans on paintings that are insured for millions and do nothing about it.

Because challenging the powers that be are truly frightening. Especially now that the system is precarious. And then comes the question: How do you fight against trillions of dollars, the GDP of entire first-world nations, against a system designed to keep you poor and disenfranchised?

And I don't really have an answer to that. I don't think anyone does. You try, and you get COINTELPRO'd. Nowadays, all you need is to find a tweet or something embarrassing somebody did two decades ago and scream loud enough. This environment has never been better for keeping people in check, because you don't need black vans to take people away. You just need terminal, disposable retards on social media. And there are countless numbers of them.

At least in China, you can see your social credit score.

EDIT:

Wow, I went off.
 
@Secret Asshole the problem with your analysis here is that it doesn't remotely apply to OR.

OR has extremely sturdy and widely available gibs. It isn't a welfare state paradise but the way benefits function here is completely different from anywhere else in the US.

People are getting their basic needs met without jumping through hoops. There's a labor shortage. Everyone who wants a job has one, or more. Chronic, tent city homelessness is not something that normal people fear happening to them.

It still sucks here and I can sperg out about why if anybody is interested.

The critical mistaket you're making is talking about the US like it's one system. It's not, as should be obvious by the fact that states are free enough to choose whether to kill sick people or not. Most of the stuff you're talking about here is run by states, not by the US.

Go right over the border to Idaho and it's a different world.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I Got The...
For now. Everywhere else it's been tried it soon slippery sloped its way into killing people with treatable mental illness. Or veterans who complain too much.
Damn maybe burgerland should actually offer mentally ill people treatment then instead of tossing us out on the streets (sometimes literally) and saying good luck?

Because that's basically what they do, especially in red states.
 
Back