💪 Tough Guys Dalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Free Chud?

  • Free him, he a good boy who dindu nuffin

    Votes: 80 42.3%
  • Enjoy prison, Chud

    Votes: 109 57.7%

  • Total voters
    189
And it doesn't retroactively extend to past deeds, you retarded left-wing faggot.
Curious why haven't you followed his example? If you feel he is in the right, both legally and morally why are you here malding on this forum calling me a faggot instead of being the change you want to see in this country? To be clear, I'm not encouraging this. I strongly discourage it despite your insults. I just can't help but notice a discrepancy here.

The retard got shot by his own gun? How do you fuck something like this up so bad? Inbreds with guns are a greater danger to themselves than anyone else. :lol:
It's a well documented fact that niggers can't aim!

Screenshot 2026-05-19 at 23-26-52 Alerts Kiwi Farms.png
Oooh look! We've gotten on BOTH accounts to go on my profile and negrate kek
 
Last edited:
According to one stupid black "journalist." And that doesn't matter, either. He may have reached for his weapon and THEN a black retard violently attacked the racist guy?

No that's according to the arrest warrant. He turned and reached into his jacket pocket for his gun.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/15/us/chud-the-builder-shooting-court-appearance

Dalton Eatherly – who goes by “Chud the Builder” online – got into an argument with another man, identified by officials as Joshua Fox, outside the Montgomery County Courthouse in Clarksville Wednesday afternoon, according to an arrest warrant.

Eatherly, 28, turned his body “in a bladed stance” toward Fox and reached for a firearm in his jacket pocket, after which a “physical altercation” happened, the warrant said. Eatherly fired his weapon and Fox was struck multiple times, according to the document.
 
God, you dumb faggots think "provocation" is a lifelong title all future actions meet. Unless Chud was personally "provoking" this dumb shit in that moment, it doesn't matter. And "provocation" is still a nonsense term.
Not a single person has argued this you flagrant homosexual :story:

Dalton pre-meditating self defense will be used against him by the prosecution regardless of how the fight was started. This is his own retarded fault, he publicly stated before the fact that he was going to murder someone 'in self defense', no amount of trash cans or calling people libs will change this, your boyfriend is likely going to jail.
 
It's so fucking dumb that some people are completely incapable of understanding the concept that BOTH sides can be wrong.
Yes, they’re both retards. I think almost everyone here can agree on that. Again, nobody thinks Chud is a good boy. Nobody sees him as a warrior or savior of the white race which makes the thread poll retarded as fuck, btw.

The reality is that we don’t know what happened yet so everyone is just debating like a bunch of crotchety old hens in the hen house.

The white women in this thread are arguing that Chud provoked the attack using his prior streams as evidence of probable provocation during the shooting incident. They are also arguing that being a nuisance streamer and using incendiary language, particularly the attack word known as “nigger”, makes Chud the real nigger here anyway so we should ignore the bigger issue of no impulse control violent blacks getting away with the assault and murder of Whites after using the “they called me a nigger” defense. Chud doesn’t have the right to defend himself because of the rule of FAFO and tHeMz tHaR FiGhtiN wOrDS.

In their opinion, calling someone a nigger and asking them if they’re going to chimp out is the same thing as saying, “I’m gonna kill you and then rape your wife and children.”

The men in this thread, while conceding that Chud is certainly a retard and acknowledging that his antics are ill-advised, are questioning whether saying nigger within hearing distance of blacks on live stream, most of whom just laugh and walk on by, and asking the ones who do react if they’re going to chimp out makes his right to defend himself null when an attack does occur.

Is it okay to allow blacks to attack whites because they said they heard the trigger word?

Personally, I am arguing that it is never okay to escalate from having words with someone to a physical fight under any circumstances, but if someone attacks you first, you should have the right to defend yourself by any means necessary even if you said nigger first. I just don’t want to live in a world where it is okay to assault someone because they called you a nasty name.

My biggest concern is unequal application of the law which is becoming a commonality in an increasingly corrupt legal system and I think this case is illuminating this issue which is why I’m interested in it.
 
Curious why haven't you followed his example? If you feel he is in the right, both legally and morally why are you here malding on this forum calling me a faggot instead of being the change you want to see in this country? To be clear, I'm not encouraging this. I strongly discourage it despite your insults. I just can't help but notice a discrepancy here.
You: "PROVOCATION IS THE LAW IN TN! HE'S COOKED! THIS MATTERS!"
Not a single person has argued this you flagrant homosexual :story:
Every single argument has been inventing him as "provoking" people, saying it's why he's toast and had it coming. The faggot I corrected was using it, trotting out TN law as if it would apply to this incident:
God, you dumb faggots think "provocation" is a lifelong title all future actions meet. Unless Chud was personally "provoking" this dumb shit in that moment, it doesn't matter. And "provocation" is still a nonsense term.
Its a legal term per Tennessee state criminal law and in most other states. Like it or not its the law of the land and its going to be the hill that the lawyers are going to argue around on his case.
And it doesn't retroactively extend to past deeds, you retarded left-wing faggot.
Curious why haven't you followed his example? If you feel he is in the right, both legally and morally why are you here malding on this forum calling me a faggot instead of being the change you want to see in this country? To be clear, I'm not encouraging this. I strongly discourage it despite your insults. I just can't help but notice a discrepancy here.
Rather than just acknowledge you are misunderstanding the law you've been citing forever, I get this irrelevant segue? Do you understand that defending crucial rights I believe in doesn't mean I want to/will use them in the same way as others, or police their use when it's different from mine?
The white women in this thread are arguing that Chud provoked the attack using his prior streams as evidence of probable provocation during the shooting incident.
Wait, am I arguing with women on here, for real? Am I in the girl section? The lack of logic and unfamiliarity with principles is overrepresented here. We should tag them so I don't waste time thinking evidence or logic or reasoning or laws might sway them.
 
And it doesn't retroactively extend to past deeds, you retarded left-wing faggot.
This is where you are wrong. Chud has been trying to provoke an attack on him so he can legally murder someone for months, he has publicly stated multiple times what his plan is. This makes the defences job of convincing anyone he acted purely in self defense very difficult, even if he didn't instigate this incident (which he may or may not have done).

Due to Chud's immense retardation, he has given the prosecution not just a running start, but already allowed them to lap him before he's off the blocks.
 
I’m convinced everyone who supports the nigger attacking Chud is
Ah, so exactly zero people in this thread.

In the meantime, I’m just going to laugh at these angry blixes and high road cucks who aren’t totally acting like liberal white women 🤢 while they impotently sticker bomb people with top hats and trash cans. It’s probably worthwhile to just get the information directly from X than to bother with a thread like this anyway. Let the bootlicking Good Whites suck each other off in peace.

*sniff*
*sniff*
...
"IM GOIN BACK TO TWITTER IF THE WHITE WOMEN ON KIWIFARM DON STOP BULLYING ME!!! 😡😭"

Bro, god bless liberal white women for traumatizing the shit out of you worthless incels. Both you and the other faggot are all women this, women that, Jesus Christ. :story:
 
Wait, am I arguing with women on here, for real?

Are chud bros really at the point where they’re calling anyone who disagrees with them “illogical women”? Kek.


Every time I check this thread, they look more and more desperate.


I wonder why people keep bringing up his tweets, his character, his behavior, and his threats of murder… It’s almost like that stuff actually matters to a jury.


I know in your likely autistic mind you’re ready to hit me with the “erm, actually the law says…”
🤓☝️


But if this goes to a jury, I hate to break it to you: there’s a reason people take plea deals to avoid one.

Now, Chud is lucky and he might get somebody’s grandpa and he can OJ the case I doubt it because its pretty unanimous by the community he plagued for months will now judge him in turn unfavorably but who knows.

You may say it’s wahmen brain
But you’re an absolute fucking moron if you think anything about the law is logical, consistent, or fair.

And I wish I was as sheltered as you so I could believe the law is really applied by what is written, lol.

But hey that sword goes both ways. Maybe Chud will be free.

But holy fuck if he does get out of this I hope he learns his lesson cause he is really close to losing it all.

He’s doing some high stakes gambling on his fucking life
 
Last edited:
How many more concessions will white people make for blacks in order to appease and placate them in the hopes that they will be less violent and more civilized?
You guys are not the victims. Even the most vehement racists of the Jim Crow era wouldn’t want an idiot stoking the flames of a race riot because of some chud’s actions
Of course, you're asking a bunch of White Niggers to consider the idea that provocation is an actual complication to self-defense claims and not just a conspiracy to “keep the White Man down”
A lot of white people in this thread really show how broken they are—they have to rely on a chud to be their beacon of ‘whiteness.’ There’s no accountability or introspection at all.
Wow, a white pedophile exists. You really proved you're point by naming a white pedophile completely unrelated to the case.
People tried calling the Joshua Fox that IS RELATED to the case a pedophile because they found a guy with same name to justify chud shooting him.
 
Last edited:
Yes, they’re both retards.
IMG_7125.jpeg

Not only was chud shooting somebody, after recording and doing his self employed job of being a nuisance the bullets could have killed innocent bystanders.

He was being so fucking reckless with the gun that bullets were flying everywhere. He even struck himself.

Could have struck others.

And did strike Fox.

The bullets were ricocheting everywhere
 
The picture of chud in dress is obvious fake and should be removed from OP. The source photo is out there that was used to make the fake and the person who created the fake has taken credit for it. The original photo is cringe enough without needing any editing.

2222.jpg

1111.jpg

Original post with fake pic: Link

Apologies if this has already been pointed out already somewhere in the hundred plus pages of this thread.
 
Mmmm. Reaching, definition : to touch or grasp by extending a part of the body (such as a hand) or an object.

Not "shooting", not "threatening to kill unprovoked", not even "insulting"(which he probably did anyway). Just reaching. A reasonable thing to do if you feel threatened. Strangely it does not say WHO started the physical alteraction is absent. It does not say who went toward the other first and with what manner or intent. Or even what was the verbal altercation about.

In short, you are baiting. It works but it could be better, no ?

Hopefully the police report will be released at some point. Now THAT'S going to be fun.
 
In their opinion, calling someone a nigger and asking them if they’re going to chimp out is the same thing as saying, “I’m gonna kill you and then rape your wife and children.”
Please "are you going to chimp out" is 1 to 1 to saying "do something about it" typical fight starting bullshit
 
Back
Top Bottom