💪 Tough Guys Dalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Free Chud?

  • Free him, he a good boy who dindu nuffin

    Votes: 47 40.2%
  • Enjoy prison, Chud

    Votes: 70 59.8%

  • Total voters
    117
Provoking fights makes him an obnoxious faggot. Calling out nigger behavior in public makes him based. Neither of those things are crimes, nor are they direct and imminent threats to someone's safety.
You are correct but consider that he isn't being tried because of his speech, he's being tried because he shot someone. Tennessee's self-defense law like many others states that you have no right to self-defense if you provoked the conflict. The idea behind self-defense is that you did not want violence and that you had no choice but to shoot them to prevent harm from coming to you. Yes the nigger is committing a crime in attacking him, no civilized person should respond to words with violence, but as the law stands, if you are deliberately seeking out violence through provocation, you are an instigator, not an innocent victim and you don't get to shoot people.

"Your honor, I wasn't being provocative when I shot that African-American gentleman! All I did was call him a nigger for my livestream!" isn't a very compelling argument.
 
Provoking fights makes him an obnoxious faggot. Calling out nigger behavior in public makes him based. Neither of those things are crimes, nor are they direct and imminent threats to someone's safety. That, more or less, is the current legal standard to justify violence. Will that change? I hope not. A lot of major legal precedent is set from cases involving gigantic scumbags.

The median age of his jury pool is about 30. 64% is 18-64. 55% white, 22% black, 12% hispanic, then asian/other. College degrees are below the national average at around 30%. Median household income is about $70k with per capita income being $34k. Poverty rate is around 10%. Lots of skilled tradesmen and people that work on the military base. The county went Trump in 2024 to the tune of 58.5%.

It's a little more racially diverse than the rest of Tennessee, but it's also younger and still solid red. It's also the South, so there's a good chance the locals have laughed at a nigger joke once in their life. To be in the jury pool there, you have to be registered to vote, not be a felon, and have an active drivers license/state ID.

If a black guy attacked me and got shot in the process, the progs in my area would give me the chair. Especially if my post history and wanton use of racial slurs were used to besmirch my character. He definitely has a better shot than I would.

Is “based” a legal defense.
Also you keep framing it weird. You’re not really being objective.

It’s more like this dude was employed to go around downtown instigating problems. The cops continually told him to stop. He tweeted and spoke he would never stop until he shot a nigger dead.

Then went to a court house (because once again it’s his job to cause problems and he was resolving yet more legal trouble) and approached some black guy (by his own admission) started doing what he is self employed to do. He beat his ass and he shot the dude just like he said he would when he found the right one.

You’re making it look like he was defending himself.

Others might perceive it as him making good on a promise.
 
Last edited:
Derek Chauvin was convicted of murder after the "victim" died of a fentanyl overdose. A guy in Austin TX was convicted of murder by a jury of his peers for shooting a guy who pointed a loaded AK-47 at him and his family. Chud provoking/escalating/premeditating the situation aside, why would you willingly be the guinea pig to test the limits of our justice system? Spoiler alert: the pendulum isn't swinging in the direction you want. Save yourself the 30 years in prison.
 
It could be argued that "Chud the Builder" is a fictional character created for a livestreaming show and does not necessarily reflect the beliefs, opinions, or intentions of the character's performer, Dalton Eatherly.

The allegations that Eatherly is or was a transvestite into being pegged by black women would tend to create complications for the theory that "Chud the Builder" and Mr. Eatherly are the same person.

In short, "Chud the Builder" is fake and gay, and no content posted by or of the character is relevant to the case against Dalton Eatherly and should be excluded from evidence as irrelevant and prejudicial.

What does this case then become?
A hostile fan of the fictional "Chud the Builder" stalks/confronts/attacks the actor who plays the character as he exits the Montgomery County courthouse?

I dunno, mang, if you're walking away from an agitated stranger demonstrating a poor differentiation of fantasy and reality and then they attempt to king-hit you, "fear for your life" sounds pretty reasonable.
 
That he got followed is a claim which only featured in his account of the incident. Other bystander accounts (and the warrant) only state that he approached the group, got into an argument with one member (whilst reaching for his gun), and fired after they initiated the fight. Also, why wouldn't we conflate his content with this incident? He has a documented history of screaming "nigger" at niggers, and we know it's not just something he does for the camera because this all started after he used the slur during a road rage incident before his streaming career. The court's grave decision to charge him for ATTEMPTED MURDER tells me that whatever footage the courtroom's outdoor surveillance cams recorded must be damning. There's no way Fox actually followed him down the street if the government felt it appropriate to level a charge that severe. They're not going to get that conviction but still.
Whoever said this thread is split among people who use twitter and those who don't was dead on

You live in BLMerica chud a single n word and the feds freeze all your bank accounts
 
SOMETHING SOMETHING U WERE BORN WHITE THATS YOUR TEAM COLORRRRRRR
The wignats who think this way have never understood that when most white people confront the concept that the only way to save our race is to act like underhanded retard niggers, their natural triple digit iq response is to think if that was the case there's nothing worth saving and it's better to take your chances as an atomized individual. This is why we need wignat reservations in America. I dont want them to die off, they're part of our history. They should have their own rez out in arizona to cook up meth and kidnap each other's daughters in. They can have their own council of elders and reservation police. Anything is permitted on the rez but niggers and jews. As for the huwhyte man proper? We'll continue reading books and thinking and inventing cool shit and just generally doing our thing. Maybe I'll take my kids to see the tribal Skrewdriver dance and pick up some black sun blankets. A tribal artist might have a gallery of bix nood paintings at the local community college.
 
If a black guy attacked me and got shot in the process, the progs in my area would give me the chair. Especially if my post history and wanton use of racial slurs were used to besmirch my character. He definitely has a better shot than I would.

Chud has a 0.0% chance of beating the charges.

You Hitler loving faggots are living on a different planet. You've been passing the same low intelligence arguments to each other for so long that you just can't discern reality anymore. Don't even know if you ever could.
 
If a black guy attacked me and got shot in the process, the progs in my area would give me the chair. Especially if my post history and wanton use of racial slurs were used to besmirch my character. He definitely has a better shot than I would.
If you didn't get the chair, you'd kill yourself after the jury's acquittal dents the persecution complex which gave your life meaning.
 
Last edited:
IMG_7108.jpeg IMG_7109.jpeg IMG_7110.jpeg

Just to add something informative instead of all the retard slap fighting.

Some of you might not be familiar with this dude. But he has his own thread:

https://kiwifarms.st/threads/alex-rosen-chet-goldstein-gordon-flowers-predator-poachers-usa.89418/

Anywho, I actually do enjoy him making pedos cry.

He’s doing fund raisers and shit. Decking out his twitter in free chud. Ten toes down for his homie, lol.

If you’re going to be a grifter. At least do something like getting pedos locked up.
(Alex’s own questionable past aside lmao)
 
If a black guy attacked me and got shot in the process, the progs in my area would give me the chair. Especially if my post history and wanton use of racial slurs were used to besmirch my character. He definitely has a better shot than I would.
If your post history is you fantasising about shooting niggers then of course it would be used to besmirch your charecter if you shot a nigger :story:

Free speech doesn't mean a prosecution cannot use things you've said in a case against you.
 
You are correct but consider that he isn't being tried because of his speech, he's being tried because he shot someone.
I'm not overlooking that. He shot someone, admitted it, and is being charged with attempted murder. Self defense is an affirmative defense.

State (opening)- Chud shot Nigger without justification.
Chud's Lawyer (opening)- He used force but it was justified by his reasonable belief he was in imminent danger of death or serious bodily harm.
State- What happened, Nigger?
Nigger- Chud is a racist and/or called me a nigger.
Chud's Lawyer- Does this evidence show/imply you attacked him?
Nigger- I dindu nuffin, but yes.
Chud's Lawyer- What happened, Chud?
Chud- Nigger attacked me and I shot him to stop the threat.
State- Couldn't you have done something else?
Chud- No. I couldn't retreat and I believed I was going to be seriously harmed.
State (closing)- The defendant’s belief was not reasonable and the force was excessive.
Chud's Lawyer (closing)- The state has not proven beyond a reasonable doubt that this was not self-defense.
Judge- *explains to the jury how the law works and what factors they need to consider*
Jury- *deliberates and provides verdict*


Chud's job, channel, behavior, etc. doesn't really matter to me. You could remove him entirely and put anyone or anything in his place and it wouldn't change the way I feel about the case. Some variation of the above scenario is going to take place during the trial, and what happens during the parts in red can affect any and all people accused of racism. Id rather this happen to a faggot like Chud because if it goes bad, nothing of value would be lost.

This shit is gay because prosecutors used to see cases where the facts leaned towards self defense and charges were never brought. Now, even if the nigger is raping your wife while sawing your son's head off, you're going to spend some time in prison and have your life ripped apart by the judicial system if you kill them. Too many DA offices have been taken over by social justice foids that would rather get back pats and CNN interviews by trying cases they have a high risk of losing. What would have made you retire in disgrace 30 years ago is now a springboard into political power.
 
I'm not overlooking that. He shot someone, admitted it, and is being charged with attempted murder. Self defense is an affirmative defense.
Screenshot 2026-05-14 at 08-31-06 Tennessee Code § 39-11-611 (2024) - Self-defense 2024 Tennes...png
>the threat or use of force against another is not justified:
>if the person using force provoked the other individual's use or attempted use of unlawful force


This is directly from Tennessee state law.
 
Last edited:
He assaulted Chud in public and ran off like a coward.
& then Chud followed him
Somehow, this doesn't cross into, "He got what he wanted" when Chud finally maces him in self-defense
It's not self defense when you FOLLOW them. He did it to provoke a reaction & retaliated after he got it. You all talk this shit about libtards playing dumb, does that mean you're actually this retarded? You can hear him saying "lets go get that nigger" what part of that sounds like self defense to you?
It should be legal to chase down and empty the can in his eyeballs.
Even if it was it still wouldn't be self defense. You are not DEFENDING YOURSELF when you are CHASING someone. You operate on the backwards logic that YOU want to do Y & Y should be legal so anyway you can twist the law to make it sound legal to you & your hugbox is fine, even if it sounds fucking insane to any rational human. You will force X to be Y when the two aren't even close.
 
View attachment 9026703
>the threat or use of force against another is not justified:
>if the person using force provoked the other individual's use or attempted use of unlawful force
I'm not ignorant to that either, and that's where the judge's instructions and the jury's deliberation draws that line. Hence why I really tried to highlight the importance of that in my effort post.

Section A of the image you posted includes abandoning the encounter. This will be reliant on facts we don't know yet. Did Chud square up, try to fight, and get the shit kicked out of him before shooting? Probably not self defense. Did he get attacked, try to cover up or defend, or get tackled/restrained before shooting? An unwillingness to participate in the fight is an abandonment of the encounter even if your non-threat words caused a punch to fly. He may or may not have had the opportunity to retreat. There's a bit of circumstantial evidence. There's the audio of Chud screaming about getting nig off of him. He grazed his left bicep with a bullet which is really hard to do if it's just a negligent discharge while you're unholstering. I haven't seen anything implying he was a willing participant in the violence. THIS PART IS CURRENTLY AN UNKNOWN.

The legal definition of provocation is above my education and seems to vary from place to place. It doesn't look like there's anything in Tennessee law that codifies that. Again, that's probably going to come down to how the judge decides to give the jury instructions. It's all going to be judged based on the moment the confrontation started to when the shot was taken. 3-4 minutes max. That's assuming he just gets charged with attempted murder and not a plethora of other things that may be easier to convict on.

We don't know why they were there, how it started, or what exactly happened. All of those things are what makes our arguments wrong or right. I just haven't seen anything yet that exonerates or condemns him. Otherwise we're just blowing smoke up each other's asses and speculating on things we know little to nothing about.
 
Glad to see the resident rightoids disown this guy. Nice improvement over when they were lionizing James Fields (the 2017 Charlottesville, VA rally car attacker). Which, even if one were to cope and believe he was completely innocent, at the end of the day it was still a White trash schizo untermensch getting removed from wider society. You'd think they'd be glad for something like that; it's not like him getting jailed was going to un-plow everyone, and resurrect Heather Heyer.
 
This is the most obvious fed imaginable. Mark my words this will lead to some law being passed that gives niggers immunity if they attack someone for calling them a nigger
 
Provocative speech is protected.

It really isn't. We can invoke 1A all day long, but there is a line. The situation where you are using potentially lethal force after causing the need for that force is very often where that line is. The Supreme Court knew this with Chaplinsky, but they've also known that not everything qualifies. If anything, what qualifies as "fighting words" anymore has been reduced down to basically just the racial slurs.

We obviously don't know all the facts and won't until the trial

Which makes it fascinating that anyone is creating these wild ass scenarios to defend "ChudtheBuilder" at all. A significant part of this thread is just throwing random bullshit out there to manufacture a defense for what may actually be an attempted murder.

Going forward, is it going to be legal for black people to enact violence on white people that say nigger?

It never has been, and never will be. This and your question after are purely the realm of fantasy.

constantly diminishing right to defend yourself and your property.

If anything you are describing the exact opposite of what is happening nationally. Stand-Your-Ground laws without a duty to retreat are the law of the land in the vast majority of States, most States don't have a duty to retreat in a home and of those some don't even have it in a vehicle. The only way that you can view this as a true sentiment is if you only look at specific areas of the United States. We're past the point of justified self-defense cases like Bernie Goetz being controversial culturally, we are now in the "we must allow self-defense even if they may not pass the smell test according to state rules" era.

the footage their outdoor surveillance cams recorded must be damning.
It's not self defense when you FOLLOW them.

I don't know of a courthouse that allows you to bring your firearms into the facility, either. Most courthouses also don't have a firearms check area. It is entirely possible that he had to leave his gun in his car, had the verbal altercation, went to the car to grab his gun, then went back to continue the altercation. If that is the case, then you are no longer in a self-defense situation.
 
I don't get this chud's point.
Yeah, nigger is just a word. Nigger nigger nigger. But...

Mr & Mrs are having a fuck? Put it her cunt. After all, cunt is just another word for a snatch.
That's a lot different from walking up to man and calling him a cunt.

Wanna chat about what rights gays should/shouldn't have?
That's not the same as getting in a stranger's face and calling him gay. That would be aggressive.

Should the word nigger be an instant ban or cancellation? Hell no. In many contexts it's just another rude word.
Go up to a blackman and call him a nigger? You've just started a fight. Any escalation is something you've started.

There are 99 ways to provoke a confrontation. Telling a nigger he's a nigger is guaranteed a negative reaction.
That's not a chimp-out. That's a man defending his honour in the face of deliberate provocation.

Funny? Maybe. Gets views? Certainly. Whatever point this cunt thinks he's trying to prove, this ain't it.
 
Back
Top Bottom