💪 Tough Guys Dalton Levi Eatherly / Chud the Builder / ChudTheBuilder - Putting the hard r in retard. IRL streamer who provokes confrontations with Tennessee blacks and shot a guy while streaming.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Free Chud?

  • Free him, he a good boy who dindu nuffin

    Votes: 125 39.2%
  • Enjoy prison, Chud

    Votes: 194 60.8%

  • Total voters
    319
Another thing is escalating force. If a person is unarmed and you’re an able bodied man you’re going to have a hard time in court if you shoot someone. I am not a lawyer but I’ve heard that is a sure fire way to get manslaughter at minimum.
Everything you say, do, and possess WILL be used against you.
@Potentially Criminal
Can you weigh in on the quote above? I always heard that in a 1v1 escalation of force is a no no and you’ll most likely get pinched for it.
 
Last edited:
buying a physical plane ticket makes sense if you're retarded and think it would be harder to trace by having someone buy them for you

buying one to Turkey makes sense if you asked chatGPT what the easiest route to a country without extradition treaty is.

USA -> Turkey -> Syria

I'm really curious as to what evidence will be presented in court about the airline ticket.

If his team can demonstrate he paid for a round trip airfare then there is some other explanation.

But if they can't demonstrate that then we know what his plan was, dumb as it is.

Can you weigh in on the quote above? I always heard that in a 1v1 escalation of force is a no no and you’ll most likely get pinched for it.

It all depends on circumstances. Zimmerman got off but he had no ability to flee and had already been rather badly injured, demonstrating his need for deadly force.

If you shoot someone as soon as you get into a fist fight you're going to be in deep shit.
 
They know that stuff is totally incriminating they just don't care.

In their mindset niggers get away with shooting whites all the time and now whites must start shooting niggers and getting off to even the score and "put the fear in them". That's as far as their logic goes.

They're too fucking dumb to understand that precendents that allow people to shoot anyone that takes a swing at them would play right into the hands of black criminals and allow a whole lot more violent disorder against whites and everyone else.
Niggers do get away with killing whites all the time, what planet are you on? Are you actually just black or some other minority? Because that would explain your inability to comprehend what others are pointing out here. We already have a system where whites are punished more harshly for legally permissible behavior than blacks are for blatantly criminal behavior, what do you think the point of "Defund the police" has been? Why do you think George Soros has funded so many DAs and judges? You sound like a cucked Republican who says "Oh, we better not set that precedent otherwise the Dems will do it to us!" As if Democrats and Niggers are famously measured and reserved in wielding power against their enemies.

We already have the precedent that you're allowed to shoot people who take a swing at you, that is what stand your ground means. Just because you and others like @Vlad the Implier want to pretend we don't, or that the "proportionate response" clause means something it doesn't, doesn't change the fact. The idea that you have to let someone just tee off on you before retaliating with "equal or proportionate measure" is just absurd if you think about it even for a second, it only takes one punch to knock someone out and for their head to hit concrete, killing them. Just look at Calvicular running over the guy in Florida with his Cybertruck - he was safely in the vehicle when the guy jumped on his vehicle, but because stand your ground laws exist to prevent people from doing shit like jumping on your vehicle, Clav was not even charged despite saying on livestream he hoped he killed the guy and not otherwise expressing any fear of the situation.

Just an aside but I have watched many of his clips in the past and despite assumptions it is clear that SOME blacks actually enjoy their encounters with Chud and some cannot even stay mad at him when he's calling them a nigger and asking if they're about to chimp out. There was one clip where it seemed like they easily could've become friends. Niggers do respect strength and if the wrong ones smell weakness on you, you're going to have problems.

With that said Chud is obviously a retard and I've said as much elsewhere well before this happened. He picked a really stupid thing to be famous for. I encourage people to not go around using the NIGGER word because it gives niggers all kinds of outs, like how they can now just disregard anything else of pertinent value you might've said, suddenly have the right to kill you because you used it, they're no longer responsible for whatever they do next, how your fellow whites now have to turn against you regardless of the merit of your case all because you're an evil person using an evil word even though it's just an ugly word describing even uglier people and their ugly behavior. The problems are compounded even more by hate speech laws and activist lawyers, judges and politicians.

So Chud is an idiot but his bond amount was insane and unjust and I'd be lying if I said a big part of me doesn't hope he gets away with it because I am sick of niggers getting away with literal murder. You can go back to the jurors on the OJ Simpson trial admitting they acquitted him to get one over on whitey, this shit has been going on for a long time, there's no low they won't stoop to in order to defend their own on a purely racial basis. If white people did the same thing this country would be a much better place. Unfortunately for Chud there's a fine line between bravery and stupidity and going around and taunting niggers by nigger saying isn't going to be what changes things and now he's put his life into the hands of people who maybe don't care or are incapable of understanding what the law says or that what he did was legally or constitutionally protected. A white man doesn't get tried but a jury of his peers in the USA.
 
We already have the precedent that you're allowed to shoot people who take a swing at you, that is what stand your ground means. Just because you and others like @Vlad the Implier want to pretend we don't, or that the "proportionate response" clause means something it doesn't, doesn't change the fact.
That is not what stand your ground means. Stand your ground means you do not have a duty to retreat when presented with a threat. Self-defense applies when YOU did not provoke the conflict. If you are deliberately inciting conflict, you are not justified in shooting someone over trouble that YOU specifically sought out, even if the conflict results in the other party unlawfully assaulting you.

Its literally there in the law, the law that you HAD to have read you when quoted my post where I included the screenshot of the applicable Tennessee law. I don't understand why it just isn't clicking with you and some others. Either you're being emotional or willfully ignorant. Your problem isn't with me, its with your own misunderstanding of the law that I have screencapped straight out of the Tennessee statute.

Using 1 fringe case of a high schooler doesn't mean it's happening all the time. You guys are acting like blm. You guys are having a George Floyd/Treyvon Martin Canon event and can't handle it.
This is the exact same behavior as trannies when one of them commits a serious crime. They always close in and defend each other no matter how far in the wrong the specific tranny was:
"Yeah maybe Alice shot up a school and killed little children, but you better not hecking misgender or deadname her! Just think about how many of us you've already genocided with your bullying!"
 
Last edited:
That is not what stand your ground means. Stand your ground means you do not have a duty to retreat when presented with a threat. Self-defense applies when YOU did not provoke the conflict. If you are deliberately inciting conflict, you are not justified in shooting someone over trouble that YOU specifically sought out, even if the conflict results in the other party unlawfully assaulting you.

Its literally there in the law, the law that you HAD to have read you when quoted my post where I included the screenshot of the applicable Tennessee law. I don't understand why it just isn't clicking with you and some others. Either you're being emotional or willfully ignorant. Your problem isn't with me, its with your own misunderstanding of the law that I have screencapped straight out of the Tennessee statute.
Even if you deliberately incite conflict you are allowed to defend yourself if you disengage or express a willingness to disengage and the other person continues their attack. It's in the screenshot you just mentioned. Why are you pretending as if that isn't the case?

Edited to add:
View attachment 9026703
>the threat or use of force against another is not justified:
>if the person using force provoked the other individual's use or attempted use of unlawful force


This is directly from Tennessee state law.
What does the text next to letters A and B in your screenshot mean?

Screenshot 2026-05-14 at 08-31-06 Tennessee Code § 39-11-611 (2024) - Self-defense 2024 Tennes.png
 
Last edited:
(I’m seriously wondering if this thread has a bot or auto clicker problem like they show up like legion)
Just wait till the actual trial. I'm sure the thread will be flooded with new accounts rehashing the same tired arguments from the last 140 pages and giving everyone 🗑
 
I read what I posted. Its literally 5 sentences. I know that if he withdraws from a conflict he started and made it clear that he didn't any trouble that he can defend himself. I'm saying:
1. I haven't see any indication that that was the case unless some video/audio has been released since I last saw this thread.
Even if you deliberately incite conflict you are allowed to defend yourself if you disengage or express a willingness to disengage and the other person continues their attack. It's in the screenshot you just mentioned. Why are you pretending as if that isn't the case?
Either you're not reading or you're being le epic trole. I've said literally every thing you're claiming I haven't.

What does the text next to letters A and B in your screenshot mean?
I know what these words mean. I've already communicated this. Show me where this happened.
 
Last edited:
Firing seven rounds in a crowded public place with some bullets ricocheting and shooting not only your intended target but yourself after baiting people to come at you for months seems like the bond amount is low. They should make him rot not only for his own safety but the general publics safety. Not to mention he had plane tickets out of the country and a ton of ammo and body armor.

My bet is if chud gets out hes gonna go right back to irl nuisance streaming with a much larger audience who hates him and hire a cheap security guard who has a gun since he can't carry and that puts the general public at risk.
 
We got the wigger, the nigger, and now the Judge is there anyone not involved with this case, that is not either a lolcow or a horrorcow at this point?
 
Last edited:
Oh lol it really is for his own good, I thought people were exaggerating.
Screenshot 2026-05-22 185219.jpg


Very sad we won't be treated to additional tweets and stream ramblings about how he just had his lifelong wish of shooting a nigger fulfilled and felt completely safe during the whole encounter and can't wait to leave the country asap. I hope to god he takes this all the way to trial and doesn't bitch out with plea deal, after that Rekaita fiasco fell through I am owed some white trash court TV entertainment.
 
Just look at Calvicular running over the guy in Florida with his Cybertruck - he was safely in the vehicle when the guy jumped on his vehicle, but because stand your ground laws exist to prevent people from doing shit like jumping on your vehicle, Clav was not even charged despite saying on livestream he hoped he killed the guy and not otherwise expressing any fear of the situation.
>White men have fallen victim to a two tiered justice system that punishes their non-criminal behavior more harshly than nigger miscreants' actual crimes

>Proceeds to cite case where a white man plausibly committed vehicular assault (against some brown guy, no less) and walked away without charges in the very next paragraph

The Stand Your Grand law's self-defense permissions do not extend to your property, so the Floridian government would have been well within their rights to charge clavicular with vehicular assault for his decision not to drive in reverse. The brown tard posed no threat to his personal safety, the law prohibited him from utilizing lethal force to protect his property, and he had an alternative means of leaving that would have posed lower risk to the brown assailant. Still, despite possessing the grounds for a grave charge, Florida let him go. Why? because he's young, that guy was a cunt, and no one was seriously injured. According to your outlook, he should have been beaten down by the two-tier justice system for the crime of being white.
 
Back
Top Bottom