- Joined
- Jun 13, 2020
Can you name one that's not?It's the nature of the Farms; some cows are hilarious and some are just not.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Can you name one that's not?It's the nature of the Farms; some cows are hilarious and some are just not.
His last comment doesn't surprise me.double posting but daniel shares his thoughts on Taylor Swift:
View attachment 5423800
I mentioned this before in the thread, but America used to have a competent approach to dealing with stuff like this. Daniel is exactly what loony bins were designed for and the fact that he hasn't been permanently institutionalized is really just another example of how modern criminal justice policy enables people who are clearly a danger to society.the wealthiest first-world nations cannot afford the mentally disabled.
I mentioned this before in the thread, but America used to have a competent approach to dealing with stuff like this. Daniel is exactly what loony bins were designed for and the fact that he hasn't been permanently institutionalized is really just another example of how modern criminal justice policy enables people who are clearly a danger to society.
The modern cost of care for seriously mentally ill people in insanely high. To keep a person like Daniel medicated, supervised and housed in a mental hospital is around 200k a year. You have to pay for medication, all of the staff, the hospital it all adds up. It's a huge reason why we no longer have the mental hospitals like we used to.I mentioned this before in the thread, but America used to have a competent approach to dealing with stuff like this. Daniel is exactly what loony bins were designed for and the fact that he hasn't been permanently institutionalized is really just another example of how modern criminal justice policy enables people who are clearly a danger to society.
The psych system has always had a problems with hypocrisy.It's not just America; a lot of western nations shut down their institutions around about the same time. It's not so much a criminal justice thing as it was a result of a century of abuse and dehumanisation leading to politicians shutting down institutions and making it significantly harder to gain the legal requirements to put someone under permanent care. Essentially, the psychriatic system was so fucked up and full of people who were just as crazy as the patients running the system that it was too difficult to recover. Psychology and mental health used to be a wild west of whatever the lead clinician at the time thought would work the best rather than the standardisation we have now.
I'm not sure if it's the same in the US, however in most nations it's not the police who decide to institutionalise someone -- it's mental health nurses and psychologists/psychiatrists which then has to be escalated up to the courts to sign off on permanent locking up.
The same safeguards that stop Daniel from being locked up also protects the freedom of individuals who aren't a danger to others from being locked up needlessly; it's a catch-22.
True, but this is the problem in and of itself. I think we can all agree that Daniel can't be trusted to stay out of trouble and we would all be better off if he was in some kind of mental institution. It's not difficult to prove that Daniel is dangerous, so there should be systems in place to get people like that off the streets and into state care.The same safeguards that stop Daniel from being locked up also protects the freedom of individuals who aren't a danger to others from being locked up needlessly; it's a catch-22.
Considering the amount of taxpayer-funded programs that consistently benefit no one this feels like a drop in the ocean. Realistically if we were to cut the spending on rapists and murderers by instituting the death penalty while simultaneously rounding up freaks like Daniel and putting them into specialized care facilities I think it would be a win-win for everyone.The modern cost of care for seriously mentally ill people in insanely high. To keep a person like Daniel medicated, supervised and housed in a mental hospital is around 200k a year. You have to pay for medication, all of the staff, the hospital it all adds up. It's a huge reason why we no longer have the mental hospitals like we used to.
Yet.Who would benefit from locking him up anyways? He hasn’t seriously hurt anyone in public......
Daniel has proven not only to harmful to himself but others. He has a long history of self harm and attacked Bob multiple times. He's also physically threatened multiple people with violence. He's threatened to bomb police stations and murder people. He is the definition of "danger to yourself or others" yet because our mental healthcare in the US is so fucking shit he is allowed to roam freely. It's insanity pun intended.Who would benefit from locking him up anyways? He hasn’t seriously hurt anyone in public other than being a nuisance. The only person he’s hurting by being loose is himself and maybe Bob but Bob can cut ties with him and he is vehement about not wanting to be in care. Even if forcibly placed into care he would just be a dang
The reason a lot of people think this is unacceptable is because homelessness is considered inhumanely cruel for human beings, in the same way starvation or acute chronic pain.he deserves to be homeless he’s gotten care before and left because he doesn’t want to abide by the rules
In Daniel's case, not only is he dangerous, but he clearly cannot take care of himself. He's missing an outrageous number of teeth and his feet are a total mess to look at. I dare not even think of the condition his junk is in after prolonged use of that unwashed fleshlight he was carrying around.homelessness is considered inhumanely cruel for human beings, in the same way starvation or acute chronic pain.
I personally agree with both yeses as answers to both questions. Daniel being homeless does endanger society at large. Even with all the ramblings he says and crackpot false bravado about being famous attributes to it too.The question is not does he deserve to be homeless (the answer is yes), it is does Larson being homeless endanger society at large (I suspect the answer is also yes).
I really only caught like the last 5 minutes on recording. I found these on reddit though and they got about everything I did.Daniel uploaded a video earlier talking to some guy about his court dates and vanderwaal related things. From the sounds of it there was definitely some Discord cow tipping going on.
View attachment 5433233
He talks about the brief interaction here
View attachment 5433235
View attachment 5433236
@Spiddlekick I'm waiting on those recordings