Daniel Micay / strcat / strncat / thestinger / GrapheneOS - Schizo software programmer and developer of GrapheneOS Android ROM. Starts drama with everyone and accuses them of harassment. Chronic brigader and bridge burner.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
daniel_micay.jpg

Wow, based on that picture I can say he is fantastically near-sighted. I'd guess he is legally blind without his glasses. I'd place his Rx at -8.00 to -11.00 spherical diopters for both eyes based on the distortion through his lenses. He's also amblyopic, meaning his one eye is much weaker than his other. His left eye is his dominant eye, his right eye is the weaker of the two, by quite a bit. He's also likely got a bit of astigmatism in his R eye due to the pincushion effect seen in the picture. He uses a full frame because his Rx would be a challenge to impossible in a semi-rimless or rimless style. The full frames also help hide the thickness of the lenses. This fucker is really, really blind without his glasses. If you knocked the glasses off his face, he's be completely helpless.

I'd imagine, based on his potential Rx, that he has been wearing glasses for most of his life, and his Rx has been deteriorating with time. His Rx is likely to get significantly worse before it stabilizes. This level of near-sightedness is unusual, unless it runs in his family, or he was born very premature.

My man poorly photoshopped glasses onto his face

No, that is actually what happens with an extremely high negative sphere Rx. Normally it can be managed these days, but his Rx is so negative it can't be hidden. He is likely extremely near-sighted.
 
Last edited:
Candid Apples, an independent third party also documenting Daniel Micay, has published another blog post about a mysterious person who asked him to delete his post.

tweet.png
link in tweet (a)
source (a)

So what was the reason?

post1.png

Because I posted about it on here. :story:
Note, I edited documentation of Candid Apples in to the same post as the facedox, so this person must have been so upset at the facedox, he kept refreshing the thread to see my edit.

Now your first guess as to who this was might be Daniel Micay himself, and that was mine too. But since the conversation ended after he wouldn't take it down, I think otherwise. If it was Daniel, he wouldn't stop responding, he would escalate the situation and accuse him of "directing extreme Kiwi Farms style harassment" towards him or something like that.

I think it's more likely this was matchboxbananasynergy, these days he seems to be the #1 defender of questionable GrapheneOS decisions. Consider the following recent examples:

privatephoneshop.png
source (a)

This is about Private Phone Shop, who was a target of Daniel Micay's usual tough guy antics for the crime of selling end-of-life devices. Daniel should have considered instead asking them to label the devices as EOL, and the fact that banana man isn't willing to look in the mirror and consider if his actions were in the wrong, again, speaks volumes about the sort of people that orbit GrapheneOS.

Or how about this reply to Jonah Aragon who chuckles at the recent GrapheneOS licensing notice that basically says fuck you Copperhead:

copperhead1.png
source (a)

I'm not sure how this is supposed to help GrapheneOS legally, given that the notice accuses Copperhead of being responsible for doxing, harassment and swatting. Doxing and harassment, maybe if I squint. But swatting? Nigga, that's a serious accusation and you need serious evidence to prove it. If I was them, I would be looking to sue Graphene for defamation (unless of course they did swat him but I think that's unlikely).

Oh, but he doesn't stop there. He has inherited Micay's trait of replying to everybody who replies to a GrapheneOS critic:

copperhead2.png
source (a)

copperhead3.png
source (a)

copperhead4.png
source (a)

How the fuck do you know what Jonah's actual intentions are, or that he knows he's making nonsense claims? Why do GrapheneOS people always seem to have magical mind-reading abilities?

Regardless of the above, I am willing to bet millions that whoever talked to Candid Apples was associated with GrapheneOS. Who else would care so much about their Kiwi Farms thread?

Continuing:

post2.png

Candid Apples assumes that we swatted Micay. So let me make this clear:
We have not swatted Daniel Micay.
Not only do we have rules against that, not only is there no evidence, the timeline doesn't make sense. He was allegedly swatted on 25 April 2023, but we only talked about him negatively a month later (after he accused Louis Rossmann of contributing to swatting him) and this thread was created on June 1st.

At least Candid Apples didn't delete the post, and he explains why:
post3.png
source (a)

In case it wasn't clear, Daniel Micay accuses the LineageOS community of spreading misinformation and engaging in harassment.

lineageos.png
source (a)

So, don't use LineageOS, I guess.
 
Great posting @Markass the Worst. However, I'm skeptical regarding these Daniel "orbiters"... I wonder if some language analysis tools can shed light on whether they may be the same person(s). Considering how they veto and memory hole features that would make "law enforcement's" job a lot more difficult (i.e. duress features) - I can't shake the feeling that they are some variety of controlled opposition. Virtually 99% of GrapheneOS users get OTA updates without any oversight outside of the GrapheneOS "inner circle" (of "orbiters"). They have 99% of GrapheneOS user's "root-of-trust" (I expanded on this earlier in this thread). We have no evidence they've done anything malicious using this power, but we have loads of evidence they behave maliciously interpersonally. So, like Louis Rossmann has pointed out - how can any sane person continue to trust them with such an important piece of our tech infrastructure? Perhaps the reason they dislike F-DROID so much is because it is the only commonly used software amoungst GrapheneOS users that enforces another gate of oversight (outside of inner circle orbiters) before software hits their devices. That oversight is mostly regarding privacy - not security - of course.

I used to think that GrapheneOS isn't the problem and it was just Micay... but no. It's GrapheneOS. Everyone involved in it is like this.
It was like that for as long as I can remember; anyone questioning GrapheneOS/Daniel would immediately get reported back to Daniel to receive some sort of official reply or narrative correction (across Twitter, Reddit, Matrix, etc). I see this either being due to the fact they only promote people who are 100% in line or they are all part of some pre-existing / funded group (or a mix of both). I learn towards the latter because their inner circle is just too effective at enforcing their hierarchy while simultaneously claiming to be against hierarchies, for rationality, etc (the whole leftist blag). So do they only promote and recruit the top .001% of orbiter talent in the world - or is it contrived...

I found Daniel Micay's facedox!
I hope so... However, what is your take on the accuracy of the typical AI detection tools out there? I tried 3 different AI image detectors and they all read Daniel's headshots as approximately 80% AI!
 
Last edited:
I hope so... However, what is your take on the accuracy of the typical AI detection tools out there? I tried 3 different AI image detectors and they all read Daniel's headshots as approximately 80% AI!
AI detectors are complete bunk. In practice they're well-documented to be inaccurate, and in theory, if you can train something to detect AI outputs, you can likewise train your AI not to output whatever markers are used to detect it. Language analysis tools are in a similar boat; they're really weak evidence.
 
Glad I checked back to see Daniel's ugly face. You're doing God's work, Markass. Having met a lot of privacy software advocates and developers, and having pondered the orb of cybersecurity myself, some of these guys are absolutely fucking insane. It's actually part of what drove me toward iOS with custom Apple Configurator profiles courtesy of Jonathan Zdziarski, who wrote dspam and invented iOS jailbreaking, and is totally not schizophrenic. Though I will say that OpenBSD's spamd that spoofs a real mail server and simply asks everyone to try again in a few minutes is a surprisingly effective way of killing spam.
 
Daniel Micay woke up today and decided to shit on FUTO. This was completely unprompted as far as I can tell:
1.png
source (a)

Blatant lies from Metrofag. @larossmann has literally never posted in this thread, you can see for yourself if you actually look at it.
2.png
source (a)

GrapheneOS somehow has millions of dollars in funding despite Daniel Micay's behaviour:
3.png4.png
source (a)

Daniel Micay only sends proof of "harassment" in DMs because he doesn't want to "spread attack content" (read: if I post it in public then people scrutinize my baseless claims).
5.png
source (a)

Arguing with critics on X:
6.png
source (a)
7.png
source (a)

To this random person, I hate to break it to you but it's not just Micay that has problems. Everybody involved with GrapheneOS is like this (Metr0pl3x, for example) and if they weren't they left the team a long time ago.
8.png
source (a)

I also hate to break it you that there's no oversight over Daniel Micay and he is the one in control of GrapheneOS.
11.png
source (a)

Daniel claims FUTO is still attacking him. I have no idea what he's referring to, so he's either making this up or some trolls raided his chat and claimed to be from FUTO (they're not).
9.png
source (a)

He's saying that Louis Rossmann claimed the phone was just for demonstration (of FUTO's voice app), but that was taken from my post, so is he implying that I'm Louis or something? Either way, Louis literally says in the video that it was a coworker's phone so any arguments for this instance are invalid. Find something else.
10.png
source (a)

Do what Daniel Micay says and look into it for yourself.

Source is 4:18 from this video
Bold is mine, coloured text are notes.

...the voice to text turns into complete garbage. And I can demonstrate how that is on this Android device in front of me, I actually broke mine, so I am using a coworker's Android device, so I'm a little lost compared to usual...

(Louis demonstrates the problems with the Google Keyboard)

Now I'm going to show you how FUTO's voice input keyboard works.
So what you do is go over to the Play Store over here and you can find this piece of software in the Play Store...


(Louis installs FUTO Voice Input and opens the keyboard switcher, here you can tell the same phone that Louis said earlier belonged to his coworker is running GrapheneOS)

Keep posting Louis Rossmann's Kiwi Farms account, Daniel. I'm sure that will help.
12.png
source (a)

"Rossmann is still harassing me!!!" he says with no proof.
13.png
source (a)

Daniel Micay is chronically unable to ignore clearly obvious trolls.
14.png
source (a)

Some blocks:
15.png
source (a)

Daniel warns that something being source available doesn't mean you don't have to trust the devs, therefore don't trust FUTO. He's right on the first part, but it's hilarious because while an untrustworthy keyboard might be bad enough, it's nothing compared to the entire operating system. Like, say, one particular graphite-themed OS directed by a schitzo who constantly accuses people of doing heinous shit that they haven't done.
16.png
source (a)

Over on Mastodon, a simp says that Louis is "utterly ignorant" about engineer's brains. I don't know what part of an engineer's brain involves falsely accusing somebody of (being complicit in) attempted murder. Also, Daniel threatens a lawsuit against FUTO:
17.png
source (a)

Daniel accuses FUTO of being tied to "fascists" such as Curtis Yarvin.
18.png
source (a)
He appears to be referring to a video of Eron (FUTO founder) talking with Curtis Yarvin (a). I am unaware of anything bad in their conversation, but knowing Micay, even talking with an alleged bad guy makes you a bad guy too, so I don't think the contents matter.

I find it hilarious Daniel whines about Louis banning people who bring up the GrapheneOS drama. That's a sign that he wants fucking nothing to do with you, not that he's actively contributing to harassment.
19.png
source (a)
Oh, and another lawsuit threat. If I donated to GrapheneOS, I would be deeply uncomfortable at my money going to a clearly frivolous suit. I'm not a donor so I hope he files it. It would be pissing away money and that would be hilarious. He might even lose $83k.

More on Louis Rossmann:
20.png21.png22.png
source (a)

23.png
source (a)

Bonus: Daniel Micay accuses a new location service named BeaconDB / Libre Geolocation of being "grifters" and having "engaged in extensive attacks on GrapheneOS."
beacon1.png
source (a)

Now on what basis does he make that claim?
beacon2.png
source (a)

Oh, okay. He's just too chicken shit to directly name /e/ Foundation and CalyxOS as his reasons for hating BeaconDB.
 
Last edited:
Open Source Developers belong in some sort of Communist Chinese internment camp for feral autists where they drop in a crate of AI-generated fetish porn, McDonalds, and Anime DVDs every day, and extract Rust code like a farmer collecting eggs. Not a single one of them can manage their little fiefdoms of bullshit competently.
 
Louis Rossman, on jewtube, has publicly welcomed jewgle and jewtube suing him/FUTO. possibly even said this multiple times.

If this absolute moonbat wants to pick a legal fight it’s going to be a great use of the misguided money given to grapheneOS to hasten its demise and the movement to the inevitable superior fork.

I wonder if Louis literally ever thinks about this faggot.
Vice versa Louis is, that classic line, totally rent free. Every moment Daniel wakes up, just back to seething.
 
I love how without fail Micay uses that Graphene official account to immediately jump on his allies and accuse them of bullying and harassing him the instant they step out of line.

"Louis Rossman should be hanged until dead and quartered and sent to all the realms of the kingdom but the criticism about this thing is mildly correct and..."
"YOU HAVE SIDED WITH A CAMPAIGN OF BULLYING AND HARASSMENT AND MURDER"
"No, no, death to the Rossman line, I just think th-"
"YOUR CRIMES IN LEAGUE WITH THE CAMPAIGN OF BULLYING AND HARASSMENT WILL SEE YOU DRIVEN FROM OUR COMMUNITY, I SHALL NOT REST AT STOPPING YOUR CAMPAIGN OF BULLYING AND HARASSMENT AGAINST ME ER I MEAN OUR TEAM"
 
Novel theory: If your nickname is some kind of clever programming acronym, or better yet, the name of a UNIX command - Your opinion can probably be discarded.
Being pedantic here but strcat is not a UNIX command, it is a C standard library function.
I wonder if Louis literally ever thinks about this faggot.
Vice versa Louis is, that classic line, totally rent free. Every moment Daniel wakes up, just back to seething.
Not only does Louis not think about him ever, I get the impression he doesn't ever want to ever think about him and wants absolutely fucking nothing to do with him ever again. Can't blame Louis for feeling that way.

Speaking of which here is more of Louis Rossmann living in Daniel Micay's head rent free. A schizo meltdown:
1.png
source (a)

Demanding retractions:
2.png
source (a)

More sending-evidence-only-in-DMs for some reason, and whining about us when all we do is literally just post his own words.
3.png
source (a)

There allegedly was private "bullying" before Louis posted his 'informative and unfortunate' comment. Also, a direct mention of me.
4.png
source (a)
5.png
source (a)

Thanks, Daniel. You're so kind :)
I do want to correct you on what "active communication" has happened between me and Rossmann. Here's how you can check:

1. Go to https://kiwifarms.st/search/
2. For "Keywords" type in "larossmann"
3. For "Posted by" type in "Markass the Worst"
4. Observe the results
5. Goto 1 but switch "larossmann" and "Markass the Worst"

Active communication is a two way street. So even though I have mentioned him several times the only active communication is when he has replied to me. That is exactly one post in his own thread and nothing else.

Ironically enough the post is Louis being kind to people (such as Hector Martin) despite them smearing him as some sort of harasser for merely having a Kiwi Farms account. Read it in its entirety and tell me he's a piece of shit.
louis_chad.png

Or you can continue to call him a "fascist sympathizer with disgusting views" and continue to be roundly mocked by the Internet. Your choice.
6.png7.png
source (a)
8.png9.png
source (a)
10.png
source (a)

Now here's FUTO to show us how to respond to controversy in a more tactful way.
11.png
Gb7TMB-bwAA_5ar.jpg
source (a)

I don't know where Daniel gets this idea that Louis is retaliating for not doing an interview. Rather than, you know, the far bigger issue of being accused of attempted murder which he didn't do.
12.png
source (a)

Somebody suggests to not feed the trolls. Daniel hasn't learned a thing and unironically thinks responding will discourage them.
13.png
source (a)
 
Last edited:
Like I previously expressed, I read this as a sort of distraction from the fact that they methodically slander privacy-valuing software and methodically ban anyone from their community that doesn't enforce the idea that "well you have to trust someone" (privacy-invading hardware/software: Google, Titan M, App Store, chromium (without ublock), ChromeOS, Windows (anything except for Linux and customer's rather than gov's/corp's power over root-of-trust). Lately in their community, they are also very opposed to F-DROID, which is the only "appstore" that actively works to prevent privacy invasion. Perhaps the GOS crew's job is to deanonymize the segment that needs the more secure/private software but isn't quite at the level where they can build it themselves (like the kabal they work for). I realize this includes conjecture, but the correlation increasingly builds...
 
Back