Nana Feeder 9k
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2024
Got my hands on his July 3rd court appearance. He starts the waterworks almost immediately. For context; Danny got in trouble for threatening a former friend named "FunkyBeans" revenge porn blackmail, an act he had done routinely over the last couple of years without consequence. Funkybeans, however, actually followed through on legal actions and took him to court. I am currently adding the entire saga to the OP, as it has since become a pretty major part of his life.
Highlights;
He talks about about being a "very successful" Youtuber who is targeted due to his high status. This idea that lower YouTube streamers are explicitly targeting him due to gain exposure and credibility at his expense has been a pretty common fallback excuse for him for a while now.
He mentions "people coming to my house"; casually neglect that that was his own sister after he accused her of attempting to look up his OnlyFans profile;
Blames his PDD -"which is autism"- for his behavior, and brings up the incident where he got into a confrontation with his defense attorney earlier in the year over being "confident to stand trial" earlier in the year. For context, Danny claims he was told explicitly by his own public defender that he would be found "confident" regardless of what the doctor actually concluded. When corrected by his lawyer, he apparently flew into a rage "for calling me a liar" and was asked to leave the office.
Danny inadvertently admits that he did in fact attempt to solicit money in exchange for not dropping revenge porn, but not in that exact specific way he's accused of doing it.
He attempts to circumvent the PO by claiming he could have "hypothetically" been speaking about anybody who has accused him of threatening them, despite specifically bringing up this case countless times on stream. This appears to be one of his Sovereign Citizen loopholes, as he has mentioned this little workaround in streams before.
Danny, seemingly still falling back on some form of SovCit courtroom hacks, claims the judge is unconstitutionally "bringing up old stuff" by referring back to previous restraining orders, what he was told not to do, and what he proceeded to continue doing. He would later go on to claim in livestreams that this alleged unforced error on the part of the judge is why he feels the US Supreme Court will eventually rule in his favor.
In a hail mary, Danny brings up his bizarre paranoia over "my friends talking to each other" as evidence in his defense, and plays up how successful his YouTube career has been.
And finally, annoyed that the verdict did not go his way, begins whining that he deserves to be heard by the Supreme Court, and that the judge clearly sided with the plaintiff because both are women.
Highlights;
He talks about about being a "very successful" Youtuber who is targeted due to his high status. This idea that lower YouTube streamers are explicitly targeting him due to gain exposure and credibility at his expense has been a pretty common fallback excuse for him for a while now.
He mentions "people coming to my house"; casually neglect that that was his own sister after he accused her of attempting to look up his OnlyFans profile;
Blames his PDD -"which is autism"- for his behavior, and brings up the incident where he got into a confrontation with his defense attorney earlier in the year over being "confident to stand trial" earlier in the year. For context, Danny claims he was told explicitly by his own public defender that he would be found "confident" regardless of what the doctor actually concluded. When corrected by his lawyer, he apparently flew into a rage "for calling me a liar" and was asked to leave the office.
Danny inadvertently admits that he did in fact attempt to solicit money in exchange for not dropping revenge porn, but not in that exact specific way he's accused of doing it.
He attempts to circumvent the PO by claiming he could have "hypothetically" been speaking about anybody who has accused him of threatening them, despite specifically bringing up this case countless times on stream. This appears to be one of his Sovereign Citizen loopholes, as he has mentioned this little workaround in streams before.
Danny, seemingly still falling back on some form of SovCit courtroom hacks, claims the judge is unconstitutionally "bringing up old stuff" by referring back to previous restraining orders, what he was told not to do, and what he proceeded to continue doing. He would later go on to claim in livestreams that this alleged unforced error on the part of the judge is why he feels the US Supreme Court will eventually rule in his favor.
In a hail mary, Danny brings up his bizarre paranoia over "my friends talking to each other" as evidence in his defense, and plays up how successful his YouTube career has been.
And finally, annoyed that the verdict did not go his way, begins whining that he deserves to be heard by the Supreme Court, and that the judge clearly sided with the plaintiff because both are women.
Last edited: