- Joined
- Jul 25, 2022
I start out with a methodology such as thus: I pretty much disbelieve everything anyone says about their personal life on the internet until they build up some credibility/continuity over time. While the bank leaks were funny, they were not necessary because Burnell contradicts himself constantly, sometimes in back to back sentences; when his chat calls him out, he lashes out like a child which makes him look even less credible.if you need a 10 hour video to figure out that dsp is lying then you're probably as dented as he is.
DSP likes to frame it like "Phil Derangement Syndrome," but at least for me, it's not; it's how I approach anyone who shares their personal life on the internet. He is just especially egregious in completely shattering any continuity or consistency (and it's to a comedic extent). Someone who actually had built up credibility and starts spinning yarns and falls from grace, then that MAYBE deserves a 10 hour debunk video - not DSP, who had no credibility to begin with. That's my two superberries on the issue, anyway.