Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

How much will David sue the farms for?

  • $0/no suit

    Votes: 117 5.3%
  • Hundreds

    Votes: 17 0.8%
  • Thousands

    Votes: 44 2.0%
  • Millions

    Votes: 183 8.3%
  • Billions

    Votes: 135 6.1%
  • Trillions

    Votes: 470 21.3%
  • A steamy night with Null in a lace negligee

    Votes: 1,238 56.2%

  • Total voters
    2,204
This is a named party he is suing? Because that seems like something the Judge would crucify Acerthorne for.
Even more so now with laws being drafted about deep fakes.
all this lawlfare hurts my head...

I dunno, mocking someone has been pretty clearly defined as acceptable use so I don't really think there is much here for the judge to use.

Is it childish? Yes
Is it Stupid? Most definitely

But Stabby has painfully learned in the last year that mocking someone isn't a crime.
:story:"Learned"
 
all this lawlfare hurts my head...

I dunno, mocking someone has been pretty clearly defined as acceptable use so I don't really think there is much here for the judge to use.

Is it childish? Yes
Is it Stupid? Most definitely

But Stabby has painfully learned in the last year that mocking someone isn't a crime.
Mocking is fine. But faking content created by the oposing litigant, particularly his voice via AI, to spew some really ugly shit is not that. That's a whole new area of stupid.
 
Stebbins v SidAlpha Docket 26 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

The court denied Acerthorn's motion for leave to file for reconsideration but is allowing him to file a third motion for reconsideration by March 4, 2024.
StebbinsvSidAlpha6.png
The Court remains unconvinced it has jurisdiction over SidAlpha.
StebbinsvSidAlpha.png
The court wasn't exaggerating, Acerthorn literally explained a "glaring problem" with his own argument in his first response.
Acerthorn wrote
glaringproblem.png

What will happen if Acerthorn is unsuccessful?
From the Court's June 2023 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: PROPER VENUE
If Plaintiff fails to establish that venue is proper, the court will prepare a report and recommendation recommending that a district judge dismiss the case or transfer it to a different district
 

Attachments

Attachments

Stebbins’ master plan is revealed as he pursues people in federal court for copyright infringement for referencing any of his videos with his crummy songs he didn’t make or the logo he cobbled together.

It’s extra ironic that he borrows game footage from some other company for his videos instead of recording his own gameplay.

I’m looking forward to the next filing in this mess.
 
Acerthorn has started content farming. He takes a 7 second clip of Adrian Deck and adds a clip of Peter Griffin saying "Who cares?" at the end. He has an 158 video playlist of videos just like this one. Each video is titled "#TikTok #Shorts #Acerthorn"

The comments section for these videos are forums for intellectual debate.
pedo.png
You would think after filing numerous defamation lawsuits Acerthorn would know not to randomly call people pedophiles with no facts to back that up.
 
The court wasn't exaggerating, Acerthorn literally explained a "glaring problem" with his own argument in his first response.
Acerthorn wrote
Why did he do this? It's actually a good thing to get ahead of the ball, so to speak, when there's an obvious issue you're going to have to deal with, to get your own counter-argument out there, but all he did here was basically argue against his own case.

Weirdly, his own argument against his own case is more competent than anything he's written in his own support.
I don’t remember this update posted here:
My opinion on these is the reference to a magistrate for a case involving a vexatious litigant is often a huge waste of time, because the scumbag "consents" to it but then just challenges every adverse ruling anyway, so you just end up relitigating the same shit before two different judges.

The purpose of these statutes for using magistrates was to save money, but that doesn't work when you have some lunatic deliberately abusing the whole process.

With a real litigant, you have the potential of losing an actually meritorious case, but if you have a nutjob, they have no case in the first place and nothing to lose with their shenanigans that the other side has to pay for.
 
Acerthorn has started content farming. He takes a 7 second clip of Adrian Deck and adds a clip of Peter Griffin saying "Who cares?" at the end. He has an 158 video playlist of videos just like this one. Each video is titled "#TikTok #Shorts #Acerthorn"

The comments section for these videos are forums for intellectual debate.
View attachment 5724993
You would think after filing numerous defamation lawsuits Acerthorn would know not to randomly call people pedophiles with no facts to back that up.

I mean I guess it's working.

These short's he's making are pretty scummy by just leaching off the original Tuber's popularity but thanks to the algorithm he's getting a few thousand views to 15k views per short. Not bad for 30 seconds of work.

I dunno how much money that really ends up generating is but it's way more views then he ever got on anything outside of his ragebait review videos and it only took him a few hours max to make 150+ shorts I'd guess Stabby will count it as win. It be nothing more then copy+paste as he uses the same Family Guy clip in each one and just grabs whatever short is trending at the moment.

Really scummy but I dunno if it's against Jew Tubes ToS.

Pretty typical for Stabby, look for the fastest easiest way to get money with the least amount of effort and go to the autistic extreme.

EDIT: I was uber bored and looked it up. Each Jew Tube short pays out 5 cents per thousand views on average so a million views is only like $50. So currently Stabby has earned himself almost enough for a Big Mac Combo Meal from McDicks. Way to go Stabby!
 
Last edited:
I dunno how much money that really ends up generating is but it's way more views then he ever got on anything outside of his ragebait review videos and it only took him a few hours max to make 150+ shorts I'd guess Stabby will count it as win.
I believe that monetization from Shorts is generally nothing, unless you're an absolutely massive channel, from a big market, and getting tons of views.


Really scummy but I dunno if it's against Jew Tubes ToS.
I don't believe so. I think it would just be subject to the usual claim and/or strike system ie only a problem if the people he's ripping off give enough of a shit to do anything about it in the first place. Mostly I think it'll go ignored, because Acerthorn seems like the kinda tard willing to fight, and who the fuck wants to actually sue and spend tens of thousands on lawyer fees, arguing over a video that likely earned a couple of bucks at best?
 
I came across an article on old Stabby's Walmart shenanigans by chance.

https://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2011/04/acknowledging_r.htm

Not much we didn't know but the author lists some of Stabby's "contract stipulations" from his original, now sadly lost, MySpace page.

And I quote;

(You can see the full contract at Stebbins’ MySpace page, although recognize that visiting the page might create an extra degree of legal risk. This web page would make an excellent exam Q. Among other contract formation techniques, the terms say “This [contract] will also take effect if I attempt to contact you, and, upon hearing my name, you do not cease communications with me on the spot.” Among the contract’s terms: “You hereby agree to never: * Interrupt me when I am speaking, for all eternity. * Hang up on me in any phone call, for all eternity. * Block my attempts to communicate with you, for any reason, for all eternity. * Ask me a question that I have previously answered, for all eternity. * Demonstrate any rudeness, annoyance, or disrespect, however petty, against me, for all eternity.” The “for all eternity” duration raises some interesting questions about post-mortem breach and enforcement. I also liked this line: “If you even so much as attempt to litigate a case with me, even if that attempt is unsuccessful, you automatically loose that case.”)

I love the "until eternity" clause, as does the author it seems. It really shows a lot about Stabby's worldview.

Nothing super new but still a nice read for David A. Stabinns aficionado's.
 
These phone calls are glorious
I´m super late, BC I just found this, IDK why this thread revived but I read it out of curiosity and boom, I find gold, I couldn´t stop laughing listening this fucking potato, wtf is wrong with this retard?! seriously

I´m impressed that someone is a Karen-like whinny insufferable lolcow besides than DSP, he´s even more Karen-like than him actually, WTF, poor clerks
 
Acerthorn has started content farming. He takes a 7 second clip of Adrian Deck and adds a clip of Peter Griffin saying "Who cares?" at the end. He has an 158 video playlist of videos just like this one. Each video is titled "#TikTok #Shorts #Acerthorn"

The comments section for these videos are forums for intellectual debate.
View attachment 5724993
You would think after filing numerous defamation lawsuits Acerthorn would know not to randomly call people pedophiles with no facts to back that up.
Acerthorn MOMENT hahahaha
Screenshot 2024-02-24 152545.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Instead of searching through shit himself he wants his audience to submit stuff via a Google Form, because the laziness of this fat slob can never be understated. ( https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdj4I5Gpcwugjrz7pmP0OmABEzaClbgGrKhlaRLRYcO_VcrHg/viewform ) ,
the notable things from it are:

1. He links his "Internet hot takes" series like they're remotely interesting.
2. Asks you to describe the internet drama and provide "at least one source" that it's occurring, which is fucking PRIME for trolls to make up bullshit.
3. Asks if you want credit by name, again, probably great troll bait with dumbass names or names of famous killers.
4. For some reason he has you tick off a thing like it's a legal waiver that even though you submit a suggestion, he isn't guarenteed too and you have to live with that. Like no fucking shit.
5. He also at the bottom puts:
"I may not be checking the replies to this form as often as I might like, especially if there's a long stretch with no new replies. So please leave a comment on this video ... https://youtu.be/F7anJu4A59Y ... or send an email to acerthorn@yahoo.com, telling me to check the form.

To minimize the chances that your comment or email will go into the spam folder, please make sure that your entire comment, or the entirety of the email's subject, will be "check the internet drama submission form," so that my filters will detect it.

Please verify here that you will be sending me a separate notification."

This also has a tickbox. So you're expected to fill out this form which he has no plans to constantly check the responses to (despite wanting to...?), then ping his email where your email is probably going into the spam bin if you don't put the exact subject title he has here (Which is fucking stupid to list as trolls will happily spam that the fuck up) AS WELL as comment on his video to get him to fucking notice. Jesus his laziness is something I can't help being fascinated by...
 
Imagine being so retarded you submit a Google Form to Acerthorn.

For sure, imagine being so retarded though you give this asshat your email (As you'd have to email him so he'll fucking check) then on top of that pinging his comments. You're basically motioned to do all 3 fucking tasks, only a troll is going to bother going through all 3 steps because if you can get Ham Planet of the Slob galaxy here to actually make a video, you could get him to say and do some really retarded shit and possibly bring him some ire from another big youtuber (outside of Sid). Since this moron likely won't even double check or fact check whatever you send him, you could probably provide him some bullshit discord screenshots or discord server with made up evidence you pumped out in an afternoon.
It's why, as I type this, I think his whole "Comment and email me" thing is on purpose not purely out of laziness, but so if you submit some huge bullshit drama he then covers and ends up in shit for, he can point at your email/youtube account and scream "NUH UH IT WASNT ME I JUST GOT THIS SUBMISSION AND MADE A VIDEO ON IT", in his mind that's all he needs to cover his ass.
 
For sure, imagine being so retarded though you give this asshat your email (As you'd have to email him so he'll fucking check) then on top of that pinging his comments. You're basically motioned to do all 3 fucking tasks, only a troll is going to bother going through all 3 steps because if you can get Ham Planet of the Slob galaxy here to actually make a video, you could get him to say and do some really retarded shit and possibly bring him some ire from another big youtuber (outside of Sid). Since this moron likely won't even double check or fact check whatever you send him, you could probably provide him some bullshit discord screenshots or discord server with made up evidence you pumped out in an afternoon.
It's why, as I type this, I think his whole "Comment and email me" thing is on purpose not purely out of laziness, but so if you submit some huge bullshit drama he then covers and ends up in shit for, he can point at your email/youtube account and scream "NUH UH IT WASNT ME I JUST GOT THIS SUBMISSION AND MADE A VIDEO ON IT", in his mind that's all he needs to cover his ass.
That's an interesting route. If there was no email submission, it would be funny to have people just send him links to his own failed lolsuits and tell him a fat retard on the internet keeps suing people for no reason thinking it will make him billions of dollars
 
For sure, imagine being so retarded though you give this asshat your email (As you'd have to email him so he'll fucking check) then on top of that pinging his comments. You're basically motioned to do all 3 fucking tasks, only a troll is going to bother going through all 3 steps because if you can get Ham Planet of the Slob galaxy here to actually make a video, you could get him to say and do some really retarded shit and possibly bring him some ire from another big youtuber (outside of Sid). Since this moron likely won't even double check or fact check whatever you send him, you could probably provide him some bullshit discord screenshots or discord server with made up evidence you pumped out in an afternoon.
It's why, as I type this, I think his whole "Comment and email me" thing is on purpose not purely out of laziness, but so if you submit some huge bullshit drama he then covers and ends up in shit for, he can point at your email/youtube account and scream "NUH UH IT WASNT ME I JUST GOT THIS SUBMISSION AND MADE A VIDEO ON IT", in his mind that's all he needs to cover his ass.
Just hit him with the old "if you don't respond in 2 seconds you owe me a zillion dollars" trick.

1709085610038.png

Ironically,this plan on spamming youtube shorts to hide his dirty laundry will only make people look up his name and hear his story.
 
Back