| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 43 | May 3, 2026 | TRANSMITTAL OF NOTICE OF APPEAL TO 4CCA via APPEAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET re: 42 Notice of Appeal to 4CCA. (lca) | |
| 42 | May 3, 2026 | NOTICE OF APPEAL by David Stebbins as to 41 Memorandum Opinion and Order. (Attachment: # 1 Envelope) (lca). | |
| 41 | Apr 26, 2026 | MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER The 29 Objections are OVERRULED; the 24 Proposed Findings & Recommendation is ADOPTED; the 1 APPLICATION by David Stebbins to Proceed without Prepayment of Fees or Costs is DENIED; this case is DISMISSED without prejudice unless the Plaintiff pays the filing fee within 30 days of this order; the 34 First Amended Complaint is STRICKEN from the record. Signed by Judge Thomas E. Johnston on 4/27/2026. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (kew) | |
| 40 | Apr 7, 2026 | CLERK'S ORDER. Pursuant to 39 Order, the referral of this civil action is transferred from Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley to Magistrate Judge Omar J. Aboulhosn. Signed by Clerk of Court Rory L. Perry II on 4/8/2026. (cc: Magistrate Judge Tinsley; Magistrate Judge Aboulhosn; counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (klc) | |
| 39 | Apr 7, 2026 | ORDER directing that this matter be transferred to Rory L. Perry, II, Clerk of the Court, for reassignment to another Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dwane L. Tinsley on 4/8/2026. (cc: counsel of record; any unrepresented party) (lca) |
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16 | Apr 29, 2026 | RESPONSE/ANSWER by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon to Motion to strike [14]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1001971074] [26-1398] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 04/30/2026 09:12 PM] | |
| 15 | Apr 28, 2026 | MOTION by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon to dismiss appeal [15]. Date and method of service: 04/29/2026 ecf. [1001969770] [26-1398] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 04/29/2026 12:56 PM] | |
| 14 | Apr 22, 2026 | MOTION by David A. Stebbins to strike brief Motion to Strike Docket Entry #13, the Defendant's Reply to my Response to their Motion to Reconsider.. Date and method of service: 04/23/2026 ecf. [1001965881] [26-1398] David Stebbins [Entered: 04/23/2026 12:50 PM] | |
| 13 | Apr 22, 2026 | REPLY by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon to response [12].. [1001965846] [26-1398] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 04/23/2026 12:16 PM] | |
| 12 | Apr 20, 2026 | RESPONSE/ANSWER by David A. Stebbins to Motion [10]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1001964566] [26-1398] David Stebbins [Entered: 04/21/2026 05:14 PM] |
Thought I point out that this probably will end any sort of future lawfare by Acerthorn. Hardin has demonstrated that he knows how to beat him whenever he files a bullshit lawsuit twice. He might file another after this is dismissed without prejudice in which case Hardin can simply do this again easily and cheaply.
I wonder if Hardin will branch out to a little turkey-wrangling as a supplement to his Greer specialism?
???? This is the same dude who's sued Google a billion times.
The whole time reading I was thinking about Sean, but because of the aneurism the formatting would give him. Four orphaned headers over ten pages? IT'S NOT HARD, JUDGE! CTRL+ENTER! QUIT FUCKING AROUND!
Only a wild beast would use Ctrl+Enter to stop headers being orphaned. You use a paragraph style for the headings that has "keep with next paragraph" set.
I think formatting is far from what would be the cause of the aneurism. When is he being moved to DeathFats so we can laugh at him proper?
I just hopped over from the Greer thread and I almost forgot what it looks like when a judge gives a shit about decorum.
Don't forget that he was also denied CM/ECF access at the district level. He has to physically mail in his complaints, so it will take some time. Although, last time he did email the judge's chambers to inform them mail was coming and whine about the speed, so maybe we'll get that soon.
What is the point of filing a motion to dismiss something as moot? If the judge considers it moot, wouldn't he do so anyway since it's the least amount of work required?
If a judge gets to the point of ruling on it, sure. But that could take a while, and you can't count on the judge to look down the docket and make the correct conclusion. If they're just looking at the docket and they see an explicit "this is moot" notification, they can fast track that and clean up.
Aside from it being true (and it being good to remind the court of that fact), I suspect Stabby's chimping out at it has ensured Mr. Hardin will find a way to say it as many times as possible in every filing going forward.
