Davis M.J. Aurini and Jordan Owen - Dysfunctional Creators of The Sarkeesian Effect and their farce on display

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
That's another amusingly ironic thing, IMO. On the one hand, a lot of alt-righters claim Islam is this boogeyman that "liberals" and "leftists" surreptitiously support in their apparently neverending quest to destroy Western Civilization. On the other hand, more than a few of Aurini's alt-right buddies at places like Return of Kings or the manosphere in general think Islam is a manly man's religion that will put women back in their place. Now that's some cognitive dissonance right there.
 
That's another amusingly ironic thing, IMO. On the one hand, a lot of alt-righters claim Islam is this boogeyman that "liberals" and "leftists" surreptitiously support in their apparently neverending quest to destroy Western Civilization. On the other hand, more than a few of Aurini's alt-right buddies at places like Return of Kings or the manosphere in general think Islam is a manly man's religion that will put women back in their place. Now that's some cognitive dissonance right there.
I think that what they are trying to complain about is that as atheists they are unable to convert to islam for the sole purpose of sharia law and that when sharia law is implemented in the west it will only affect muslims so they won't be able to benefit from it and hereditary muslims will be a privileged class (and syrian refugees are bad because they want welfare rather than because of their religion) but maybe I am overthinking things
 
I think was from the same conversation but Aurini got really pissed off at the end and sperged hard and tried to get a jab at Sargon again:

Z8ynDQr.png


Tell me if you can see the screenshot just fine. I was having problems with Lightshot Screenshot earlier today for some reason.
 
It's hard to discuss Aurini without overthinking things. His worldview is extremely simple, and he divides the entire world into only two groups. The first group consists of Davis Aurini and people he likes, and the second consists of everyone and everything else. The latter group is just one big blob that he categorizes interchangeably as leftists, liberals, feminists, SJWs, cucks, Muslims, Marxists, Atheistkult, and so on.

That's why Islam is the religion of leftism and feminism... All those words mean the same thing in Aurini's mind. It's a tautology.
 
It's hard to discuss Aurini without overthinking things. His worldview is extremely simple, and he divides the entire world into only two groups. The first group consists of Davis Aurini and people he likes, and the second consists of everyone and everything else. The latter group is just one big blob that he categorizes interchangeably as leftists, liberals, feminists, SJWs, cucks, Muslims, Marxists, Atheistkult, and so on.

That's why Islam is the religion of leftism and feminism... All those words mean the same thing in Aurini's mind. It's a tautology.

I remember Aurini once contrasted Islam with Christianity in a video of his, and he said that the difference was that Christians believed in being independent and had no hierarchy while Muslims are obligated to "do whatever the Imam says."

It's as though he's never heard of Catholicism (hierarchical, centrally organized Christianity) or Sunni Islam (where there isn't any central structure whatsoever and imams are just guys who lead prayer but otherwise hold no authority over anyone), even though those are the largest denominations of their respective religions. Even in 12er Shi'a Islam, where there is more organized authority, the marjas are independent of one another and there is no one big Imam they all refer back to. The only forms of Islam that actually correspond to Aurini's characterization are the different Isma'ili sects (Nizari Aga Khanis, Dawoodi Bohras, Sulaimani Bohras), where they do indeed have an Imam that everyone is obliged to follow unquestioningly, but those sects are all incredibly small.
 
I think that what they are trying to complain about is that as atheists they are unable to convert to islam for the sole purpose of sharia law and that when sharia law is implemented in the west it will only affect muslims so they won't be able to benefit from it and hereditary muslims will be a privileged class (and syrian refugees are bad because they want welfare rather than because of their religion) but maybe I am overthinking things

Well, on paper if you convert to Islam, you are supposed to get all the rights of born Muslims, but sometimes caliphates do not accept conversions to get that jizya money, which led to the rise of the Abbasids, who were converted Iranians.
 
Well, on paper if you convert to Islam, you are supposed to get all the rights of born Muslims, but sometimes caliphates do not accept conversions to get that jizya money, which led to the rise of the Abbasids, who were converted Iranians.

This is almost right, but here are some points of correction:

1. The caliphs who didn't accept conversions and took jizya from converts were all from the same caliphate, the Umayyads. The Umayyad dynasty is also famous for things like drunken orgies, systematically murdering members of the Prophet Muhammad's family, attacking Mecca with catapults, and having their army stable their horses in the Prophet Muhammad's tomb complex. They're basically the gold standard of bad Islamic behavior (at least until ISIS came along).

2. The Abbasids were not converted Iranians, though their army (for the most part) was. The Abbasids were an Arab clan descended from Abbas (the Prophet Muhammad's uncle), who had a long-standing rivalry with the Umayyads. The Abbasids were able to use Persian bitterness over their poor treatment by the Umayyads to recruit huge numbers of Iranians to their side, eventually overthrowing the Umayyads using Iranian manpower.
 
What is it about Thunderf00t that triggers these cucks anyway? Is this horseshoe theory in action? Don't watch his videos. He doesn't have to sperg about him all the time on Twitter for attention.

mA4LXdQ.png
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Beachpuppy
What is it about Thunderf00t that triggers these cucks anyway?

Two things.
1) He's not a total lunatic who spergs out about Star Wars in overly long articles that try and link real life statistics with a sci fi series.
2) He's famous and they want clicks on their spergy youtube videos.

That is all.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: chimpburgers
I'd say there's a bit of ideological cannibalism/circular firing-squad going on too. From what I understand, Thunderf00t's criticized feminism before. In Aurini's worldview, anyone who criticizes feminism must also believe da jooos control everything and that Hitler was right or some similar nonsense. The fact that Thunderf00t obviously does not therefore sends Aurini into an apoplectic rage. "How dare someone criticize one of my enemies without believing everything else I do too! He must be purged!" It's a classic character failing of goose-steppers like that.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BestUserName
I'd say there's a bit of ideological cannibalism/circular firing-squad going on too. From what I understand, Thunderf00t's criticized feminism before. In Aurini's worldview, anyone who criticizes feminism must also believe da jooos control everything and that Hitler was right or some similar nonsense. The fact that Thunderf00t obviously does not therefore sends Aurini into an apoplectic rage. "How dare someone criticize one of my enemies without believing everything else I do too! He must be purged!" It's a classic character failing of goose-steppers like that.
Aurini does the exact same thing with Sargon of Akkad, so this is pretty easy to believe.

You'd think he'd learn to stop throwing stones when he himself has admitted to participating in many of the things he blames for the fall of the modern world. He's admitted to having sex with men and trannies, including men and trannies of color. He reflexively shits on anyone outside the alt-right, then goes straight back to sniping at those in the alt-right who haven't kissed his ass enough. His political positions are too vile for all but the most reactionary to embrace, while simultaneously being too weaselly for even reactionaries to love. His views are too muddled for him to be clearly pinned down as either a Christian or an Atheist, but he's repeatedly demonstrated so little understanding of both philosophies even his own direct word couldn't lay a claim.

At this point, I'm just surprised he hasn't joined the site.
 
This picture creeped me out when I saw it.

TOVjqX0.png

Nothing new from his Twitter besides for some tweets to Aaron. I'll check YouTube to see if he did anything recently there.
 
Jordan might not even have realized how hard he could fuck himself by associating with Aurini. He's never working in his field again.

Poor guy. He sounds like a sad kid in this video, explaining remorsefully to the principal how his dog ate his summer project (The Best Bacon Collection Ever). I hope he manages to cut ties with this few years of absolute nonsense to resume his quiet life of cameras and strippers. His weird, spergy life, free of weens and applejuice skinheads.
 
Aurini loves being a paranoid conspiracy theorist:

https://archive.is/ttgC6

Also, Ramzpaul is tagged in those tweets. He's someone that I really need to get around making a thread on some time. He's this white nationalist prick who tries to disguise his bullshit as satire.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: VLAD
Back