Debat user @Maeis on lolicon, discord ERP, and the age of consent

It wasn't discord, this was the late 2000s to early 2010s. It wasn't anywhere near as bad as kids have it today
The story changes. Now you got raped on Skype or something?

Furthermore, I am employed by the government to copy digital evidence for further review by digital forensics specialists. You work with these people long enough, they open up to you. They are very frustrated with the amount of lolicons whose phones get added to their evidence pile. They have to examine the evidence, and waste their time on that while actual CP cases get shoved down the pile. And I hope to one day work as a digital forensics specialists to stop these pedophiles from hurting more kids.
Red fucking flags right here.
 
They are very frustrated with the amount of lolicons whose phones get added to their evidence pile. They have to examine the evidence, and waste their time on that while actual CP cases get shoved down the pile.
Doubt. Their phones wouldn't be searched unless they were arrested for possession of CP.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Gatcha Gonna Getcha
But until there's actual proof that they are an acting pedophile (or watch CP, it's just as bad), I'm unwilling to call them a pedophile.
A pedophile is someone who's attracted to kids. A lolicon is someone who jerks off to cartoon depictions of kids. For someone to be able to get a hard-on to cartoon depictions of kids, they'd have to be attracted to kids in the first place.
It's that fucking simple man, you're making it more complicated than it needs to be.
Regardless of the textbook definition of the word, when people think of a pedo, they think of someone trying to attack kids or watch porn of it.
Just because a lolicon doesn't watch CSAM doesn't make them not a pedo. They know they can get into trouble if they watch that stuff, so they use loli as a substitute. If CSAM was legal, I bet most lolicons would be consuming that shit.
This is like saying a gay person is not gay because they don't watch gay porn, but instead watch Yaoi porn.
 
The age man, what was it for you when the old man saw it, we have to know.
They were she-coomers bro you think teenage me wanted an older man to erp with?
>age
12-16

and verified she-coomers mind you, with both video and audio over skype.
How do you justify any of tihs?
Justify what?
A pedophile is someone who's attracted to kids. A lolicon is someone who jerks off to cartoon depictions of kids. For someone to be able to get a hard-on to cartoon depictions of kids, they'd have to be attracted to kids in the first place.
It's that fucking simple man, you're making it more complicated than it needs to be.

Just because a lolicon doesn't watch CSAM doesn't make them not a pedo. They know they can get into trouble if they watch that stuff, so they use loli as a substitute. If CSAM was legal, I bet most lolicons would be consuming that shit.
This is like saying a gay person is not gay because they don't watch gay porn, but instead watch Yaoi porn.
Agree to disagree.
 
this is not true. Evidence for these crimes gets put in a big queue of phones to be bruteforced then investigated.
Surely you can lend some sense of authority to your claims by showcasing something highly technical/specific that would lend credence to your story of being adjacent to super hackers.
 
this is not true. Evidence for these crimes gets put in a big queue of phones to be bruteforced then investigated.
So police are just going around seizing phones for no reason? They wouldn't arrest somebody solely for jacking it to drawings. It's a legal grey area but they don't want to risk setting a precedent that lolicon is okay, when it's far better to augment a CP case with the lolicon.
 
So police are just going around seizing phones for no reason? They wouldn't arrest somebody solely for jacking it to drawings. It's a legal grey area but they don't want to risk setting a precedent that lolicon is okay, when it's far better to augment a CP case with the lolicon.
No, what usually happens is someone (internet vigilante or not), reports a lolicon as if they were a pedophile. Then they have to examine it, find nothing they want to action (I don't know this for a fact, but feds probably don't want to try someone for drawings alone because the law might be unconstitutional)


Surely you can lend some sense of authority to your claims by showcasing something highly technical/specific that would lend credence to your story of being adjacent to super hackers.
I could give you some Cellebrite knowledge test if you want. I use it to prepare evidence for them.

Bro I feel like I'm on tilted towers, now he got raped on Skype again
it was both skype and a vampire erp chat site
 
Screenshot 2025-07-31 201155.webp
:lunacy:
 
No, what usually happens is someone (internet vigilante or not), reports a lolicon as if they were a pedophile. Then they have to examine it, find nothing they want to action (I don't know this for a fact, but feds probably don't want to try someone for drawings alone because the law might be unconstitutional)
They would need a warrant first, meaning they feel sure about it.
I could give you some Cellebrite knowledge test if you want. I use it to prepare evidence for them.
Do it pussy
 
Back