Debate Android Raptor about abortion again

It's more satisfying to debate her into submission than for her to end our entertainment. Plus she makes liberals look bad, she's a boon to conservativism.
And with your monster raving loony posts, you ain't so much of a boon to conservatism as you think you are. You come across as an absolute jackass.
 
And with your monster raving loony posts, you ain't so much of a boon to conservatism as you think you are. You come across as an absolute jackass.
I'm no boon to conservativism at all since I don't actively do much more than vote correctly, I don't participate in protests or anything, but I never claimed otherwise.

However, I certainly don't see how crushing your feeble liberal "arguments" (if you can even call them that) makes me come across as a jackass.

...Well, actually, maybe it does, because anybody with half a brain cell knows you libtards are either genuinely too retarded to be swayed or are so disingenuous that either way such debate is a fruitless, wasted effort. I'm too stubborn for my own good though.
 
Every time you reply to Android Raptor, another abortion is performed.
What's ur trauma?
[obligatory reply]
However, I certainly don't see how crushing your feeble liberal "arguments" (if you can even call them that) makes me come across as a jackass.
It's not even an "argument" to point out that a single ovum is not morally equivalent to a human being, it's just pointing out a fact only a retard couldn't see.
 
It's not even an "argument" to point out that a single ovum is not morally equivalent to a human being, it's just pointing out a fact only a retard couldn't see.
Look bud, if humans have inherent value then you have to be consistent, not arbitrary; you're one (1) entity throughout the entirety of your existence. From conception until 80 years later when you lie perishing on your deathbed you are that same, singular human life. This is the indisputable science.

You have a few options here:

1) Human life does not have inherent value (you reject that we are endowed by our creator with the inalienable right to life)

2) Human life only has value at certain points during a lifetime, therefore it is granted and rescinded by the government based on a set of arbitrary criteria (which I guarantee you won't even be consistent on and not everybody will agree to, but to narcissistic pro-abortionists playing god those are non-issues)

3. Be honest and admit you're an NPC that doesn't have real morals, principles or logic beyond "abortion good" who will loop back around to ad hominem and talking about how small & undeveloped the early stages of human development are as if it's some kind of mic drop in and of itself
 
No I don't. I have one option. And that is realizing the obvious truth that a single cell is not an actual human being. Only a retard couldn't understand that. An absolutely retarded retard.
Let's hear your arbitrary point in human development where the human life suddenly qualifies as an actual human to you then. Let me guess--the magic birth canal confers personhood.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chao Garden
Let's hear your arbitrary point in human development where the human life suddenly qualifies as an actual human to you then. Let me guess--the magic birth canal confers personhood.
I think by the third trimester, and yes, it's arbitrary, but at that point, you should need an actual legitimate medical reason to terminate, or a condition incompatible with life. Like any of the brainless babies on the tard baby thread.
 
I think by the third trimester, and yes, it's arbitrary, but at that point, you should need an actual legitimate medical reason to terminate, or a condition incompatible with life. Like any of the brainless babies on the tard baby thread.
Well, at least you admit it's arbitrary, and have some kind of hard limit.
 
Is this thread even about discussing the topic of yeeting babies with the roach queen anymore?
 
if humans have inherent value then you have to be consistent, not arbitrary
My actual no-bullshit position is that abortion is immoral, but as a Society we hold the average person to such a meager moral standard that expecting women to take a child to term is unreasonable. You can't give people zero actual responsibility and permit unlimited fornication, and then suddenly say "now you have no choice but to let a baby split your pelvis in half". It's not even really a moral position as much as an observation: if you fail to teach your people to take responsibility for anything, you won't see women taking responbility for childbirth.
 
Is this thread even about discussing the topic of yeeting babies with the roach queen anymore?
No, it's a place where people who believe themselves to be true masters of morals and ethics to argue about what truly makes themselves the most moral and ethical people in the thread.

In short, this
1710215352825.png
 
So if I vote for giving me a billion dollars I deserve it?
IDK it's the weird logic that gets thrown around by the guys here: "all women in the entire planet vote for American democrats or left or whatever and deserve tranny bathroom rape" Or God knows what else. I don't buy it but I just want to throw it back at them.

Your question though does raise an interesting point though. I did not vote labour, but the masses in Oz are getting a little tax cuts (slight brief boost in wage + more tax return) . Do I deserve it? I don't know but I am going to get it.

Sooo... Did Americans get any tax cuts? Do they willingly give it away because the party they staunchly loathe were the ones who brought it about?
 
Last edited:
Back