Aguring with people with deeply held beliefs exposes their agurments while testing mine. I'm trying to find the truth, not some bastardized biased truth. I learn more about political agurments, and have mine examined, critiqued, laughed at or completely destroyed. But every time I grow more sure in what I feel. If your opinion doesn't last in the sights of internet retards how can you use it on normal well adjusted people?
The title is formatted in the style of a typical debate user thread.
The right to bear arms is one of the most important rights. We know from Waco and Ruby Ridge that even armed citizens are under threat from a overreacting government, a federal goverment enacting revenge on civilians for the most minor shit. That being said, it's within our best interest that people who buy them know what end fires and how to take care of firearms. This helps everyone, tyrannical goverment? More trained firearms usage, while also weeding out those who want to be lazy and low effort about firearms ownership.
Treating women and colored people as children unable to grasp basic concepts has been a disaster currently. Imo I feel that struggling makes a people. No one gave western settlers shelter, no one gave the Roman's the tactics and abilities that made them win a empire. Did napoleon just get his battle plans and tactics? No one in history was ever just given the plans that would make them famous.
I feel like you underestimate how radically central I can be. Current thoughts are 18 plus, whatever. Let them die in war and change their gender. They want attention. The second they force gender surgeries on minors or purposely groom minors that is illegal. More laws need to criminalize what Trans supports call 'never happened ever chud!' Procedures performed on minors. This would currently cut a very profitable industry backed by western leftists so we are in the 'smoking is good for you' stage before we find the hard data is no, chopping your dick off when you were 12 was a horrible idea because a kid is unable to make decisions due to low impulse control.
Well your thoughts are wrong.
On the topic of extremism, I laugh my ass off at anarchists and see them as useful idiots. Without fail, they're always unable to grasp the fact that if society becomes subject to anarchy, it'll just invite a fascist to take power (no, I'm not talking about the leftist view of Republicans; actual fascism), as the natural result of a power vacuum is another government will fill that vacuum. Anarchists are faggots, and I'm thankful that they aren't getting their way.
The right to keep and bear arms is pretty much the only topic I hold an extremist view on. Giving the government the ability to regulate and restrict the keeping and bearing of arms defeats the purpose of having such a right in the first place, no matter what altruistic purpose they may claim to have in doing so. Here in the United States, the Second Amendment is expressly meant to act as the ultimate check against government tyranny (it's also the only amendment that enumerates a right as being unlimited in scope). I think that should be true anywhere, as not even just historically, but also in more recent times, you'll see that government tyranny follows gun control. Canada has draconian gun laws and they're seriously considering incarcerating anyone who says "Hitler did nothing wrong" for life.
So what? Let people live in a dream world. We would have to ban furries and other communities where the objective is be so.ething your not. Just leave em be. Do explain how self-ID will break down medicine? Kinda like self diagnosed tumblr users?
Absolutely not. Nobody can be "free" to do what they want. Rules must always exist limiting the way retards interact.
It's not really about "gender", a made up feminist, post-modern term. It's about sex being a bimodal spectrum, and intersex DSDs, i.e. mostly genetic illnesses, are regarded as human diversity and normal. It is destroying the need for medicine to put people in strict categories, like obese, male, female, anorexic etc. It deconstructs all objective data and creates a stigma around research dealing with human categories. It results in males in female sports or prisons.
