Debate John R. Brown MD on the nuances of pedophilia

The following radio frecuency will repeat this message.

I will be quick since I've already made every point I wanted to, essentially, and life is a short thing.

That's one hell of a cope @FailurePersonifiedV2 (very accurate name BTW), it's honestly a bit sad you can't fundamentally grasp subtle messaging in "deep works of art" such as Blood Meridian, Stephen King's novels (about real pedophiles, like IT) and Paradise Lost, like a church lady that PRAYS every day that the Protestant propaganda that there are child molesters in the Catholic Church is a lie. When that Prostestant propaganda isn't "Protestant propaganda".


Do you know how many Christcucks believe in reincarnation and universal salvation? You people are very confussed about your own religion.

Unlike you, I don't hate hold a grudge against you, because, your heart it's in the right place and in the end you're a lovable retard. "LOV ME SOME TELLY, 'TE ME SOME NONCES, SIMPLE AS LADS"
As the meme goes: "I have no enemies". Shit's complicated.
You may hate it, and I get you don't get it. But "facts don't care about your feelings".


You acted shocked and coped when a top British edgy entertainer did this shit.
You acted shocked and coped when Breachforums' lawless owner did this shit.
You will wake up one day and realise @Null has 666 TB of CP on his posession and 41% of the missing children under his floorboards, you will be surprised, shocked and you will cope, and I won't. That's how the sausage is made.

"deleted"
Free Speech absolutism at its finest @Null.
They hated him because he told them the truth.
Nigger you're the one that pulled out "she's 17 and 364 days old you monster!!" Only to get busted DMing about cunny. Oh and you reccommended we enlighten ourselves by listening to the audiobook of a toddlerfucker

Hell is too good for you, papist chomo
 
Wait, this dick is Catholic?

That's the worst thing about him!

I was just joking around when I said he was a Mormon in Idaho. But if he actually thinks that an "unbroken line" of creepy pedophiles who host drug fueled gay sex orgies is the basis for a religion, then he is truly the most depraved lunatic on this website.
Looking again I don't think he is. I just misread this

like a church lady that PRAYS every day that the Protestant propaganda that there are child molesters in the Catholic Church is a lie. When that Prostestant propaganda isn't "Protestant propaganda".
 
I will be quick since I've already made every point I wanted to, essentially, and life is a short thing.
That was some nice fiction but you got any evidence or just wild accusations? Traditionally when an assertion is made it is followed up by supporting information not just more assertions. Sourcing things as because I said so is a sign of wet brain.
 
Why do "age of consent" """debates""" keep coming back all the fucking time? Ever since women got emancipation, it is agreed that 18 or beyond this age is adequate due to you finishing school, and because of your brain being close to finishing development. Before that, if I am not wrong, the groom would agree with the father of the bride for dowry and the marriage proper. And usually the ages weren't so different from one another - being around 16 or so. We can say if that was wrong or so, sure. But that's what I know from my limited knowledge And I don't want to shit this thread.

As for people who want to make some magical revisionism and say the age should be "12" or something horrid, I like to think these people live in some dreamland, and need a reality check. Once chance before something happens to them.
 
Why do "age of consent" """debates""" keep coming back all the fucking time? Ever since women got emancipation, it is agreed that 18 or beyond this age is adequate due to you finishing school, and because of your brain being close to finishing development. Before that, if I am not wrong, the groom would agree with the father of the bride for dowry and the marriage proper. And usually the ages weren't so different from one another - being around 16 or so. We can say if that was wrong or so, sure. But that's what I know from my limited knowledge And I don't want to shit this thread.

As for people who want to make some magical revisionism and say the age should be "12" or something horrid, I like to think these people live in some dreamland, and need a reality check. Once chance before something happens to them.
Child marriage is usually a minor girl being wed to an adult man.

Also, the age of consent was 12 (and even younger in some states) until a little over 100 years ago. Women are the main reason it got increased, because they were understandably appalled by men doing shit like raping little girls and giving them STDs and getting away with it because they could just tell everyone the girl consented.
 
That was some nice fiction but you got any evidence or just wild accusations? Traditionally when an assertion is made it is followed up by supporting information not just more assertions. Sourcing things as because I said so is a sign of wet brain.
I think he got week banned.
And I don't want to shit this thread.
It’s already shit. I genuinely still can’t tell if this is a troll gone bad or if he did actually have a melty
 
Why do "age of consent" """debates""" keep coming back all the fucking time?
Because pedos are obnoxious.
No one wants to hear a debate like this, it's been done to death and pedos are extremely disingenous, literally all the time in each of these arguments.
Yet they still come back thinking anyone cares beyond "kys dumbass"
 
this is a lot of words to say pedophilia is bad
It's a lot of words to say that post-puberty but pre-"legal age" is not pedophilia.
Which is true, its ephebophilia, and only fell out of favor when Western society at large relatively recently decided that the magic age of adulthood was 18 and not 16.

While its "normal" and dare I say "natural" to see a big 'ol pair of milkies on a 16-17 year old and go "GAWT DAYUM!" as a man, we have a responsibility not to act on it in a polite society, as those are the "rules" that we've all agreed upon, more or less, as society still treats them as "children" when they're biologically not. You're an adult after puberty, that's how nature works, it doesn't matter that the law says different.

The third world of course, has not got the memo yet, neither has the East for the most part, even the ones that are "close allies" with the West. (I'm looking at you, South Korea, Thailand, Vietnam, and Japan).

I am hesitant to allowing pedos an "outlet" such as loli and fictional CSAM, and would rather just woodchip them whenever they are found, despite the fact that fictional CSAM has technically harmed no-one, and is a work of fiction. Now I'm not saying that if we give an inch for this it will suddenly be pushed mainstream, but we "compromised" with the gays, and look how that turned out...

Edit: OP, quit trying to justify lusting over teenage girls after you have graduated highschool, its creepy and weird, and could lead to getting your door kicked in.
 
While its "normal" and dare I say "natural" to see a big 'ol pair of milkies on a 16-17 year old and go "GAWT DAYUM!" as a man, we have a responsibility not to act on it in a polite society, as those are the "rules" that we've all agreed upon, more or less, as society still treats them as "children" when they're biologically not. You're an adult after puberty, that's how nature works, it doesn't matter that the law says different.
are you a pedo?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Abimelech
Yeah I noticed he lost the ability to DM. He wanted to scream he was NOT a pedo while screaming pedos did nothing wrong. Fucking retard.
I won't share buncha bear bottles with him. Pedophiles deserve to tongue my dog's qnys and then be hanged.
 
Back