Debate local idiots @mindlessobserver and @agendaposter on the First Amendment - Does it protect anti-Israel, anti-Jewish protesting dindus or not?

I think I understand @mindlessobserver's position. What did this falafel merchant do to deserve a mob of retards parking their unemployed asses on his doorstep
Yeah fuck those sit-in protestors, glad we threw them all out…

Wait, what? It’s not 1960 and they didn’t throw them out? Why?
 
I actually agree with the Romanian here. The falafel protesters are exercising their 1A rights. It is a racist and retarded exercise of rights, to be sure, but as Americans we cherish the freedom of speech/assembly, no matter how racist and retarded.

There are probably some technicalities that the police could exploit to demand that the protesters go home, but it didn't even come to that. They left on their own after a few stupid chants, with minimal vandalism. Pretty tame, all things considered.
 
I actually agree with the Romanian here. The falafel protesters are exercising their 1A rights. It is a racist and retarded exercise of rights, to be sure, but as Americans we cherish the freedom of speech/assembly, no matter how racist and retarded.

There are probably some technicalities that the police could exploit to demand that the protesters go home, but it didn't even come to that. They left on their own after a few stupid chants, with minimal vandalism. Pretty tame, all things considered.
I don't mind if they get fined for the stickers they applied or whatever they did, graffiti etc.
There has to be a clear boundary between "we use our speech and express out opinions" and "we're shitting up your place sweep it up janny". Also police should've made sure that they do not block traffic and pedestrians.
My country (somehow) has not followed the Western example and did not forbid pro-Palestine protests. Maybe cause tiny Arab population. Instead, our secret service checked every participant lmao, and one of them, a "German" was declared persona non grata and will likely face expulsion cause "proof for self-radicalization" was found.
Generally I'm very skeptical of anything that's sold as "rights", but if somebody is trying to project righteousness cause they have a free society, you better be consistent at it or I'll mock you for sure.
 
For the bad people who disagree with me. Everyone else, speak freely.
That was always the point of the 1A, to protect comfy, uncontroversial speech that challenges nothing and serves to shelter the people with money and power. It's what they teach in school.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: No. 7 cat
I don't want the police and local government to have the power to decide when protest is "acceptable" or not.
They do that here. Arabs where forbidden to hold pro-palestine demonstrations here, russians to hold pro-russia demonstrations, and they even made the nonviolent and not extremist Identitarians and their symbols illegal.

You don't want to go down that road.
Sir, this is a falafel shop. The first amendment protects free speech and right to an opinion. It does not protect a bunch of tards who want to harass a falafel shop owner. There is a line between hate crime and free speech and this is it. It'd be no different if a group of white people beat a random homeless nog to death because they have problems with Crips. You guys just seem to be letting your hatred of God's Chosen cloud your judgement. When it's your turn to be protested in front of your shop, you sure would want the cops to put a stop to it.
 
For the last several months every passing second has seen @AgendaPoster's gypsy tard genes getting stronker and stronker causing funnier and funnier manic spergouts
You only started to make these comments when it turned out that unlike you, I am not a genocidal maniac when it comes to Muslims and Arabs and I happen to be in disagreement with the yankee golem and its Jewish and Israeli best allies.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Ether Being
You only started to make these comments when it turned out that unlike you, I am not a genocidal maniac when it comes to Muslims and Arabs and I happen to be in disagreement with the yankee golem and its Jewish and Israeli best allies.
No, it was when you started a rapefugee turbosperg speedrun

This was well before the latest Semite shindig

You started assmadding like every other retarded not-huwhite savior of the huwhite race on this webzone. A venerable tradition of retarded contont production to be sure, but one you should want others to carry on, not yourself
 
  • Disagree
Reactions: AgendaPoster
You started assmadding like every other retarded not-huwhite savior of the huwhite race
You're welcome to find ONE instance where I simped for Arabs, blacks, Jews or anything non-European.
As I said.
You simply are uncomfortable with me not siding with Israel + golem and not wishing genocide on Palestinians. You literally went a whole month on that in the main thread.
That's cool. People have strong opinions on who should be ethnically cleansed, I understand.
Anything to say about 1A?
Or is thread "Debate local idiots @AgendaPoster and @draggs on who deserves genocide" needed?
 
You're welcome to find ONE instance where I simped for Arabs, blacks, Jews or anything non-European.
As I said.
You simply are uncomfortable with me not siding with Israel + golem and not wishing genocide on Palestinians. You literally went a whole month on that in the main thread.
That's cool. People have strong opinions on who should be ethnically cleansed, I understand.
Anything to say about 1A?
Or is thread "Debate local idiots @AgendaPoster and @draggs on who deserves genocide" needed?
The First Amendment? What does that have to do with anything? Is there some other 1A you feel the need to sperg about?

Simping for non-huwhites? What does that have to do with anything?

Quick rundown

1) You = not white. Some steppe gypsy Turk slavnigger 2% Germanic mutt like everyone else in Romania
2) Also a sperg who can't control himself when he gets on his new hobby horse
3) That hobby horse being tarding out about conservacucks and Joos and the dire situation of the huwhite race and God knows what else
I'm just waiting for the
4) Age of consent rabbit hole

We've seen it all before

So thanks but no thanks, we only need not-whites telling us how to save the huwhite race for the shits and giggles
 
Sir, this is a falafel shop. The first amendment protects free speech and right to an opinion. It does not protect a bunch of tards who want to harass a falafel shop owner. There is a line between hate crime and free speech and this is it.
Not according to the unanimous Supreme Court there isn't. The term "hate speech" is completely legally meaningless. There is no "hate speech" exception.

Matal v. Tam, 137 S. Ct. 1744, 1764 (2017) (“Speech that demeans on the basis of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, age, disability, or any other similar ground is hateful; but the proudest boast of our free speech jurisprudence is that we protect the freedom to express "the thought that we hate." United States v. Schwimmer, 279 U.S. 644, 655, 49 S.Ct. 448, 73 L.Ed. 889 (1929) (Holmes, J., dissenting).”).

As in any protest in an urban area, there can be reasonable time, place and manner restrictions. They can't physically prevent people from entering or exiting the establishment, or utter actionable threats, assault people, and could be kept back from the premises some distance by barriers or prohibited from using electronic amplification at ear-shattering volumes.

They can't be prohibited from the protest itself no matter how senselessly idiotic it is, though.
 
Back