Debate on why leftists want to give pedophiles access to children

[Badungus Kabungus]

From what I can see, it's pretty simple why the LGBT community demands access to children and why leftists support them. Leftists think this behavior is normal after being brainwashed by years of degenerate media, so they think they're helping the underdog. The LGBT community demands access to children because other than most of them being straight up pedophiles, they also subconsciously know that their behavior is abhorrent and abnormal in today's society, so they are trying to groom the next generation to be more accepting of their deviant acts so they would feel better about themselves and their unnatural acts.

Luckily most kids are smart enough to realize that the hulking hairy 6'3" man in a dress and clown make up that is leering at them with an erection is dangerous, and they instinctively shy away from them.

Any thoughts?

 

[Akari Is My Wife]

I think it's a small group of pedos wanting to fuck kids, and a bunch of people eager to take part in the elites' humiliation ritual against the public.

 

[Twinkletard]

I think it's just them wanting to 'own' non lefties by any means necessary. Kinda like when trump fanatics were all about dropping section 230 because it would own the libs not realizing what it really meant.

 

[Chilson]

Its about being against the other sides position purely for the sake of being against them. Right wingers are against pedo's, therefore we must defend pedo's.

Its honestly just that simple and it really does speak to how simple lefties truly are in their thought processes.

 

[Safir]

Leftists think this behavior is normal after being brainwashed by years of degenerate media, so they think they're helping the underdog.

There was a guy on twatter, who, a year ago, wrote up a thread, "they're making little revolutionaries".
He took that back. They're just evil and they want to diddle kids.

The underdog thing is a myth. The mask drops a lot (in fact it's almost always down), and "leftists" (libs) gloat a lot about conservatives' (normies') apparent powerlessness. In fact if you look closely, there isn't a single "left" value libs claim to uphold --

• social security
• pacifism
• privacy
• backing the working class in the class war
• public spaces
• protecting the environment
• sex equality
• worshiping niggers
• supporting the third world

-- that they haven't betrayed, EXCEPT sexual degeneracy. There's seriously no deeper reason. They want to diddle kids. (Some of them are too chickenshit to do it themselves, so they live vicariously through other diddlers.)

Sure, many are operatives, salaried corporate drones who do what they're told, but we know that corporations aren't motivated by profit either.
Sure, it's a shell game, corporations support each other because they're owned by the same people, Disney doesn't have to be making money if it functions as the marketing department of Walmart.

But in the end, someone has to profit, someone has to extract rational utility from all this. And no one does. You could say, Disney is an arm of Blackrock, and Blackrock is an arm of the Dem party, and the Dem party is an arm of Mossad, and...

Or, to lift an example from the headlines, the Bud Light woman:

What people don't understand about this: She used her job to give money to her friends, aka democrat activists. Anheuser Busch will lose money; but her career will only grow. The democrat party will take care of her, and most importantly, she knows it.

^ think this is clever/revelatory/common-sense? No, it's wrong, (even though it happens to arrive at the correct conclusion w.r.t. the career trajectory of the groomer ho).

What greater corporation is there than the U S of A?

So why antagonize a potential ally, as WW3 is brewing? Why not work to the benefit of your country, or your party, or yourself?

Looking for the ever greater power is the wrong approach. There are no superintelligences. There's no "America", or "Mossad", or "FSB", or "The Democratic Party" with """their own""" interests. There are just people with their private human interests, and a lot of them want to diddle kids.

 

[Badungus Kabungus]

The underdog thing is a myth

From my understanding, the whole "supporting the underdog" thing is a gateway to that way of thinking. It gets them used to the dopamine rush of "righteousness" that they get from shitting on their enemies when they believe they have justification. Then after a while, the justification goes away and they just become addicted to the dopamine rush of being self-righteous shitbags.

 

[Fareal]

Hi, this is a quick PSA about kids' library programmes.

Kids' library programmes, including school library programmes, are perpetually desperate for volunteers. If you can pass the appropriate criminal records check cleanly, and not be a complete lunatic, your local library or school will be absolutely delighted to have you volunteer to read to kids. Being read to aloud is a really important part of developing early literacy, and it's enjoyed even by middle school kids. It's a really good way to introduce variety to their personal reading, and having discussion (even casually) afterwards is a huge help in their development of critical thinking skills, including reading comprehension and source analysis.

The majority, now, of kids under 7 aren't read to at all by any adult. It's not disputed that this is holding back their literacy attainment levels. Read Along sessions and reading buddy groups are most effective in helping those kids who have the least parental input at home to pull up their attainment.

If you don't feel like reading, volunteering your time to rearrange stuff and shelve stuff frees up the full time/professional library staff to do the reading work, so that too is also really important. A lot of school libraries aren't accessible to kids unless there's some kind of supervising adult there, so you volunteering can literally be the difference between the kids getting to use the library or not.

tl;dr: if drag queen story time offends and upsets you, please give some time to go and do some reading too. If drag queen story time does not bother you, hey, please also give some time. Even a couple hours a month makes a huge difference to programmes like this.

Thanks very much, love a 25 year veteran of library volunteering xoxo

 

[Badungus Kabungus]

Hi, this is a quick PSA about kids' library programmes.

Kids' library programmes, including school library programmes, are perpetually desperate for volunteers. If you can pass the appropriate criminal records check cleanly, and not be a complete lunatic, your local library or school will be absolutely delighted to have you volunteer to read to kids. Being read to aloud is a really important part of developing early literacy, and it's enjoyed even by middle school kids. It's a really good way to introduce variety to their personal reading, and having discussion (even casually) afterwards is a huge help in their development of critical thinking skills, including reading comprehension and source analysis.

The majority, now, of kids under 7 aren't read to at all by any adult. It's not disputed that this is holding back their literacy attainment levels. Read Along sessions and reading buddy groups are most effective in helping those kids who have the least parental input at home to pull up their attainment.

If you don't feel like reading, volunteering your time to rearrange stuff and shelve stuff frees up the full time/professional library staff to do the reading work, so that too is also really important. A lot of school libraries aren't accessible to kids unless there's some kind of supervising adult there, so you volunteering can literally be the difference between the kids getting to use the library or not.

tl;dr: if drag queen story time offends and upsets you, please give some time to go and do some reading too. If drag queen story time does not bother you, hey, please also give some time. Even a couple hours a month makes a huge difference to programmes like this.

Thanks very much, love a 25 year veteran of library volunteering xoxo

If only there was such a thing as non-teacher school employees who do basic administrative work, passed all the background checks required to work at a school, and have a lot of free time because their job mostly consists of sending emails and doing paperwork, maybe they could do something to help. Oh, wait...

https://www.aei.org/carpe-diem/chart-of-the-day-administrative-bloat-in-us-public-schools/

Edit: Also, a more paranoid person would've said that those kind of programs are underfunded on purpose by the perverts in charge as to leave the next generation even more vulnerable and lacking critical thinking skills. But that would never happen, right?

 

[Jimjamflimflam]

Hi, this is a quick PSA about kids' library programmes.

Kids' library programmes, including school library programmes, are perpetually desperate for volunteers. If you can pass the appropriate criminal records check cleanly, and not be a complete lunatic, your local library or school will be absolutely delighted to have you volunteer to read to kids. Being read to aloud is a really important part of developing early literacy, and it's enjoyed even by middle school kids. It's a really good way to introduce variety to their personal reading, and having discussion (even casually) afterwards is a huge help in their development of critical thinking skills, including reading comprehension and source analysis.

The majority, now, of kids under 7 aren't read to at all by any adult. It's not disputed that this is holding back their literacy attainment levels. Read Along sessions and reading buddy groups are most effective in helping those kids who have the least parental input at home to pull up their attainment.

If you don't feel like reading, volunteering your time to rearrange stuff and shelve stuff frees up the full time/professional library staff to do the reading work, so that too is also really important. A lot of school libraries aren't accessible to kids unless there's some kind of supervising adult there, so you volunteering can literally be the difference between the kids getting to use the library or not.

tl;dr: if drag queen story time offends and upsets you, please give some time to go and do some reading too. If drag queen story time does not bother you, hey, please also give some time. Even a couple hours a month makes a huge difference to programmes like this.

Thanks very much, love a 25 year veteran of library volunteering xoxo

How do you explain all the libraries shutting out Charlie Kirk and his conservative crew when they wanted to read their books to kids?

Can't be that desperate if they are only accepting people based on having the correct ideology.

 

[WelperHelper99]

They want access to children because they're the only thing that won't fight back, the nice guy meme is real. Also metric shit tons of My Hero Academia Hentai, canonically teenagers, which they handwave for some reason. There's a lot of shit in general that gets handwaved with teenagers in media

 

[Fareal]

@Jimjamflimflam Er, normally people just read whatever's on the school or library's list of Stuff To Read To This Year Group. I mean, if you want to read something that you wrote yourself and you're promoting for sale, probably the bookshop would be the place to contact. Although some schools will do 'author visits', if you ask.

I would recommend the Paddington books as something that always goes down well, if you were looking for something and being asked to choose yourself. The Psammead trilogy too. Kids don't need stuff to be topical or educational for literacy work, your basic mainstream children's classics are totally fine. The slightly older kids also do really well on short stories since those are one hit and done and those kids can concentrate a bit longer; those are really good if it's a session with discussion afterwards. (The Lottery by Shirley Jackson if it's on the school's approved list is a belter of a discussion session.) Anything that's funny is always a good shout. Terry Pratchett's Nomes/Bromeliad trilogy never fails to reduce whole classes to tears of laughter.

 

[Odd Opossum]

To normalize homosexuality or any other non-heterosexual identity. It's worked. I don't think the right-wing has much room to talk about pedophilia at this point considering how many of them are into lolicons, down to having them as their internet account profile pictures.

 

[Jimjamflimflam]

@Jimjamflimflam Er, normally people just read whatever's on the school or library's list of Stuff To Read To This Year Group. I mean, if you want to read something that you wrote yourself and you're promoting for sale, probably the bookshop would be the place to contact. Although some schools will do 'author visits', if you ask.

That's a bit concerning that all these libraries seem to be stocked with whatever gender questioning garbage book that all these drag queens want to read but conservative books are verboten.

I would recommend the Paddington books as something that always goes down well, if you were looking for something and being asked to choose yourself. The Psammead trilogy too. Kids don't need stuff to be topical or educational for literacy work, your basic mainstream children's classics are totally fine.

I'll keep your suggestion in mind. My kids love being read to (I love reading too them) but they are still young enough that they keep tearing their books apart as well. So pretty much using thrift store books and whatever friends give us.

Edit: don't bother saying it's only because the drag books are donated. Conservatives donate books all the time. The library rejected them to virtue signal. Example, that one bint who made a big deal about rejecting Melina trumps Dr Suseus books because racist even though she dressed as the cat in the hat a couple years prior

 

[AgendaPoster]

Meh

 

[Little oak tree]

Luckily most kids are smart enough to realize that the hulking hairy 6'3" man in a dress and clown make up that is leering at them with an erection is dangerous, and they instinctively shy away from them.

and unfortunately people are stupid and trust in priests, teachers, community leaders, and other conservative pedophiles who never get caught because those are the most dangerous ones don't you think? the ones who don't look like pedos and know how to cover up the shit they do. (spoiler: most pedos are actually zealots, conservative, and extremely "moral" with other adults)
You are just picking apart whatever you want from this complex world to fit your little mind and have a narrative that makes you feel comfortable.
I'm not defending pedos, the ones who have acted on it deserve punishment and the ones who haven't need help, but this world is chaos, your white pristine castle of goodness doesn't exist.

 

[Male Idiot]

Pedophiles and western leftists are the same.

Mystery solved, Sonichu Gang!

 

[Fuck You Pay Me]

Leftoids want bussy and cunny, simple as.

 

[Ishtar]

IIRC there were Jewish writers who argued sexualizing kids was a way to prevent them from becoming fascists. I'd have to check for sources, but the notion exposing kids too and having kids participate in degenerate and manifestly unwholesome behavior served as a sort of mental inoculation-they would not find abnormal behavior or subversion repulsive, thus they would not become fascists or fascist adjacent.

A political objective is likely desired here for largely this purpose. Kids that see nothing wrong with drag queens because their exposed to naked adults dancing in front of them will not oppose the worse depravities to come when they become adults.

 

[Regio Consiglio]

Because they're evil and they hate you

 

[Akari Is My Wife]

I'd guess it's mostly about hurting and humiliating you, some actual pedophiles, and some people who get some sick thrill from doing unacceptable things and shoving it in your face