Debate @Owen Ferguson on the reading comprehension of Kiwi Farms users (and LFJ being a rapist)

[CyrusKissFanClub]

Damn, Josh's podcast has just eliminated some of y'all's natural desire to examine anything. That really sucks.
There's no point in arguing with literal cultists, you're eager for the flavor•aid.
Watch how quick this account gets blanked for saying the following:
You might be the internet's niggers, but I'm not. My fate is not tied to Josh Moon's wallet.

Your ChatGPT-provided answer distinguishes you as the holder of mega-intellect. Your brain must be like a well-oiled inference and deduction engine lubricated by gallons of fish oil, l-tyrosine, and modafinil. But maybe you are so smart you have your nootropic blend that I couldn't even begin to imagine.

I've been on KF for years, waiting for an intellect like you. Your insights are so fresh and original. I'm blown away that you asked ChatGPT, "What are the signs of a cult?" That is genius. But there are no free lunches. After that taxing thought, I bet you had to hit that super genius nootropic to replenish that intellectual engine.

You are like a messianic figure, like the Islamic Mahdi, but for KF. You have come to lead KF to a golden age, but first, you must cleanse the forum of non-believers using the power of ChatGPT.

 

[Artificial Stupidity]

Ah we got a side thread due to the faggotry we all fell for and engaged in grats owen you nigger faggot, do a flip

 

[Owen Ferguson]

do a flip

ɥʇnɹʇ ǝɥʇ ɹoɟ ʎpɐǝɹ ʇ,uǝɹɐ noʎ ɟo ǝɯos ʇlnɐɟ ʎɯ ʇou s,ʇI

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

ɥʇnɹʇ ǝɥʇ ɹoɟ ʎpɐǝɹ ʇ,uǝɹɐ noʎ ɟo ǝɯos ʇlnɐɟ ʎɯ ʇou s,ʇI

 

[The Homelander]

Like I said, keep repeating the narrative because an e-celeb and his podcast told you to for another two years. Any day now it's going to do something other than fuel a dickless chink to keep attacking autistic Perez Hilton. This is a very meaningful battle and your freedom is literally at stake if Josh has to go back to actually working

Can you actually provide any evidence he's innocent? Again, I acknowledge there's no way to definitively prove he's guilty, and I don't subscribe to the "guilty until proven innocent" ethic, but our hunch is significantly more substantiated than yours. Please offer something instead of just calling people stupid for believing a known rape apologist who is member of a group known for their perverse and demanding sexual appetites could perhaps be a rapist.