Debate the autist (NostalgiaJazzAdmirer thread)

[NostalgiaJazzAdmirer]

Any valid criticism is hidden in flames.
Not ALL trolling is cyberbullying but most of it is. Just saying "why don't you lose a couple pounds" on an unrelated video is not right.

 

[Simplicity111]

Any valid criticism is hidden in flames.
Not ALL trolling is cyberbullying but most of it is. Just saying "why don't you lose a couple pounds" on an unrelated video is not right.

What? Obviously you haven't been paying attention to it.
It isn't, but it isn't cyberbullying until they repeat it and do it in an absolutely certain cruel way.

 

[c-no]

Any valid criticism is hidden in flames.
Not ALL trolling is cyberbullying but most of it is. Just saying "why don't you lose a couple pounds" on an unrelated video is not right.

Saying lose a couple pounds on a unrelated video would be more of spam, not cyberbullying. Valid criticism would only be hidden in flames if somehow, the comments that were't constructive criticism were able to outnumber constructive criticism.

 

[NostalgiaJazzAdmirer]

Valid criticism: I think you should take out this part, it's only detracting from the script.
Flaming: Why would you put that in, you are a hack writer! You have no taste! (Slightly exaggerated but you get it)

 

[EI 903]

New thread, by popular demand.

I was waiting for @Hellblazer to ban this guy's ass, but if you guys want to keep him around, more power to you.

Have fun!

Just FYI, I'm a content mod. I can delete posts, give warnings, and move things, but if you want a user banned directly you should make a Talk to Staff thread so that the green mods and/or admins can make the call.

 

[Simplicity111]

Valid criticism: I think you should take out this part, it's only detracting from the script.
Flaming: Why would you put that in, you are a hack writer! You have no taste! (Slightly exaggerated but you get it)

None of the criticism we gave Nayolfa a while ago was like the second one. It was actually very good criticism.

Just FYI, I'm a content mod. I can delete posts, give warnings, and move things, but if you want a user banned directly you should make a Talk to Staff thread so that the green mods and/or admins can make the call.

Oh alright. Thanks for the info, I think maybe @Null should limit the guy to this thread to not derail any other threads (but not ban him to continue this debate), sort of like the aformentioned TJChurch.

 

[NostalgiaJazzAdmirer]

People crossed the line multiple times. Some even admitted that cheers wasn't right to make fun of Nayolfa.

 

[c-no]

Valid criticism: I think you should take out this part, it's only detracting from the script.
Flaming: Why would you put that in, you are a hack writer! You have no taste! (Slightly exaggerated but you get it)

Calling someone a hack writer isn't flaming if it turned out to be true. It does depend on context but even constructive criticism can use the word "hack".

 

[Simplicity111]

People crossed the line multiple times. Some even admitted that cheers wasn't right to make fun of Nayolfa.

I wasn't talking about Cheers though. I was talking about the first criticisms.

 

[Maruukat]

People crossed the line multiple times. Some even admitted that cheers wasn't right to make fun of Nayolfa.

Cheers?
What the fuck are you on about now?

 

[The Jumping Dwarf]

Just FYI, I'm a content mod. I can delete posts, give warnings, and move things, but if you want a user banned directly you should make a Talk to Staff thread so that the green mods and/or admins can make the call.

Oh, sorry Hellblazer. I haven't used the site's report feature much so I'm not used to it. Thanks for the info.

But yeah, this guy might actually provide too much content to ban. You guys should look into limiting him to this thread, though, we don't want him to fuck up even more threads.

 

[Simplicity111]

Cheers?
What the fuck are you on about now?!

He was talking about a user named "Cheersfromquesnel" (who has since been banned from this site).

 

[NostalgiaJazzAdmirer]

I mean cheersfromquiznac or whatever his name is. Don't care to see what it actually is.
Calling someone a hack without backing it up IS flaming.

 

[Reverend_Lovejoy]

Valid criticism: I think you should take out this part, it's only detracting from the script.
Flaming: Why would you put that in, you are a hack writer! You have no taste! (Slightly exaggerated but you get it)

Are you saying that there's no grey area? That a seemingly 'nice' comment can't be condescending or insincere? Or that a harsh comment can't have genuinely good advice?

 

[Simplicity111]

I mean cheersfromquiznac or whatever his name is. Don't care to see what it actually is.
Calling someone a hack without backing it up IS flaming.

They have proven themselves to be hacks though. Judging by having no series bible ALONE. Not to mention there are many other factors as well.

 

[c-no]

Calling someone a hack without backing it up IS flaming.

That can be backed up by pointing out what makes it hack, from showing grammatical errors (which can be pointed out such as by how it is said) to show how lazy the animation can be. Such things can also be compared to others works, especially those that are better while being on the same level.

 

[José Mourinho]

If I go to someone's video just to say she needs to lose a couple pounds for the fun of it, that's cyberbullying.

Lose some pounds, mate