Debate the users CreamyHerman & Lurker on Othello strategies and interdimensional quantum fascism

normal people don't debate about the minutia over whether nazis were fascists or some other type of fascist that's totally different from normal fascists even though they're effectively the same. most normal well-adjusted human beings accept that nazis were fascists, and that fascism is bad.
When you're not quite autistic enough to lack a conscience, how else do you justify holding positions that largely match up with those held by the worst people in recorded history than expanding on those differences and making mountain ranges out of mole hills?
 
i don't understand what these literal actual retards are trying to achieve here, or who they're trying to convince. is it not enough to have an entire subforum where you retards can circlejerk about how much you hate the libs and how superior you think you are to everyone else, @MarvinTheParanoidAndroid and @CreamyHerman’s ?

normal people don't debate about the minutia over whether nazis were fascists or some other type of fascist that's totally different from normal fascists even though they're effectively the same. most normal well-adjusted human beings accept that nazis were fascists, and that fascism is bad.
They're trying to obfuscate and hide what is plainly obvious about fascism.

This is why you have people saying things like "Mussolini was a socialist to the very end" - the real fact is, when he said this it was during the Salo Republic, in a cynical attempt to get people on his side against the Communist partisans. At the time, incidentally, nobody believed him and there were quite a few strikes against his rule.
 
They're trying to obfuscate and hide what is plainly obvious about fascism.

This is why you have people saying things like "Mussolini was a socialist to the very end" - the real fact is, when he said this it was during the Salo Republic, in a cynical attempt to get people on his side against the Communist partisans. At the time, incidentally, nobody believed him and there were quite a few strikes against his rule.
wait you mean to tell me that fascists will often lie about what they actually are as a means to confuse people so that they'll vote for them? no, that can't be! fascists are never known to lie!
 
  • Like
Reactions: cuddle striker
This is why you have people saying things like "Mussolini was a socialist to the very end" - the real fact is, when he said this it was during the Salo Republic, in a cynical attempt to get people on his side against the Communist partisans. At the time, incidentally, nobody believed him and there were quite a few strikes against his rule.
Explain how the best people he had were all Marxist then. Was he that charming? How was he able to fool Lenin then if he was charming?
 
So trying to find a truth obfuscated by history makes me a Nazi? Last time I check I guess that makes anyone who questions the state is a Nazi in your mind then.
"guys, nazis weren't aksually fascists at all! they were a totally different thing to fascists that do the exact thing as fascists and use the same playbook as fascists, but are definitely not fascists! the historians are wrong and are trying to push an agenda because reasons"
 
  • DRINK!
Reactions: José Mourinho
"guys, nazis weren't aksually fascists at all! they were a totally different thing to fascists that do the exact thing as fascists and use the same playbook as fascists, but are definitely not fascists! the historians are wrong and are trying to push an agenda because reasons"
Because they are, and instead of trying to have a discussion about you're tard-raging.
 
Nah, I'm genuinely curious now. @Absolutego, can we make this into a thread separate from this?
yes let's do that. the title will be "CreamyHerman's desperately wants to debate someone who isn't interested in debating a nazi". what a riveting thread such will be.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: Puff
Back