I believe that the left has all the best weapons (social-engineering tricks), and we should appropriate them.
The left (which corresponds to Orwell's Inner Party) and the right (Outer Party) had a rarely spoken of policy for dealing with the European peoples. This policy was "managed decline".
* Keep white people divided along every possible line in excess of division normally present; including economic and social class, religion, ethnicity, sex, parental status, physical and mental and social abilities, age, political parties, social/societal preferences, sexual preference, sexual identity (which TBH is a very boutique upper class signalling phenomenon), manufactured consumer identities such as gamers or stoners or pop-music fans, military veteran status, and so on and so forth. Though I will grant that some of these "identities" are the result of mental illness, personality disorders, addiction, and severe childhood sexual abuse; and even if such people were "based and redpilled" they would still be liabilities (see also: tradwives).
* Prevent them from breeding by limiting their access to economic opportunity, taxing them excessively, anti-natalist and pro-miscegination propaganda, by encouraging sterilization of youth via sex reassignment surgery and criminalizing opposition to the same, by exposing youth to sexual predators who seek to convert them into perversion via rape, and by exposing youth to violent and homicidal criminals in their day-to-day lives in the hope they will be dead or addicted to drugs before they reproduce.
* Use tax revenue farmed from straight white males to give disproportionate economic opportunity to enemies of the same, to import said enemies, and to encourage said enemies to breed in their homelands and conquered territories.
* Create and expand wars to kill and maim the most dangerous straight white men, who overwhelmingly form the bulk of line companies in all European militaries.
* When the right is in power, increase the scope of the police state; when the left is in power, purge good white men from the administrative state, install leftist cronies like Janet Reno and Madeline Albright, and let them run amok.
* Continuously centralize authority and power in the administrative state, no matter who is in power.
The above is but a subset of the methods used to gradually eradicate white people from the Earth, but it is a "good enough" subset for my purposes because:
1. It allows us to judge whether an entity is working in our favor.
2. It gives us a rough* blueprint to use against our enemies.
With this in mind, should we care that Trump forced the government of Botswana to decriminalize buggery?
Is buggery good? No, it is harmful to the people of a nation as it spreads disease and reproduces itself via pederasty.
Are Botswanans our people, friends, or allies? No, they are not our race, they see us as their oppressors, and they want only our admiration, free shit, and white women.
Do we owe them anything, good or ill? We gave them infrastructure, technology, and education, so we don't owe them anything good. It's debatable if we owe them ill, but it is safer in the long run to genocide them - in a non-violent and plausibly deniable manner - and resettle their lands with our people (or at least our men and their women, as a servitor race). They can't colonize our lands if they don't exist.
Trump's actions whether he knows it or not are a necessary first step to annihilating the negro populations of the world. Liberalism is a weapon which achieves this effect on host populations, and Trump wields it well. "Liberalism for thee, not for me" is an excellent policy for our enemies.
With these four points in mind, Trump's imposition of pederastic buggery on Botswana is hereby unironically declared Based and Redpilled.
* I say only a rough blueprint because leftists and rightists differ in disposition and methods used by them will not always or even often work for us.
tl;dr
I agree with liberals that the blacks need to be more accepting of the gays, but for a rather different set of reasons.