Debate User 3119967d0c on Black People in Section 8 Housing or Whatever

Status
Not open for further replies.
The "solution" is to let them put their own roofs over their own heads, people only care for what they have if the alternative is nothing. I'm sure a lot of people will shape up REAL quick if the alternative to not paying rent is riding freight trains around....

And I'm not saying that because they're black, I'm saying that because they're institutionalized, like prison inmates at this point, generations of families born, living and dying on the dole means they no longer even QUESTION responsibility or mobility, they just hold out their hands because that's what works.
Your "solution" is to make blacks homeless? Very interesting, James Weeks.
You just can't seem to resist these little jabs, can you? You've worked really hard to derail the subject matter of this thread, which is the ineptitude of the DNC and the Iowa Caucus, and steer toward your personal perception of President Trump.
I haven't derailed anything. People brought up the hilarious idea that Trump has actually fulfilled some, even 1%, of his campaign promises. and I replied in an honest attempt to engage. Why can't you address facts and logic?
Wait, what?
If you rip all the copper out of the walls of your social housing/section 8 house you should be put in a prison camp. It seems pretty simple to understand, hmm?
 
I haven't derailed anything. People brought up the hilarious idea that Trump has actually fulfilled some, even 1%, of his campaign promises. and I replied in an honest attempt to engage. Why can't you address facts and logic?

Wrong.

You posed this question:

I'm genuinely interested. What do you think is different about the GOPe with Trump as their President, vs. the GOPe with Bush as their President?

Is it that he says 'bullshit' in public?

You proceeded to derail from there. I'm not going to further contribute to your derailment. You clearly don't like President Trump, so arguing with you is moot. But I am not here to read your cope. I'm here to read info on the continuing debacle that is the Iowa Caucus.
 
Your "solution" is to make blacks homeless? Very interesting, James Weeks.

I haven't derailed anything. People brought up the hilarious idea that Trump has actually fulfilled some, even 1%, of his campaign promises. and I replied in an honest attempt to engage. Why can't you address facts and logic?

If you rip all the copper out of the walls of your social housing/section 8 house you should be put in a prison camp. It seems pretty simple to understand, hmm?

I suppose that its your take and so its simple for you to understand. I'm just confused as to where you get that I somehow advocated for that. That is where my confusion comes from. You keep arguing as if people say things they don't. And then you question their intelligence with smug snarkiness. We all know what your doing. Its why the thread got (quite rightfully) split.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Garth
The Houthis have always been against Saudi-sponsored takfiris like Al Qaeda.

These Arab rednecks in a desert thousands of miles away from you are doing more to blow away the people who did 9.11 than America ever has.
You'd be glad to hear this news then.
At the direction of President Donald J. Trump, the United States conducted a counterterrorism operation in Yemen that successfully eliminated Qasim al-Rimi, a founder and the leader of al-Qa’ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) and a deputy to al-Qa’ida leader Ayman al-Zawahiri.
 
You'd be glad to hear this news then.

It's a good start. He murdered many Yemenis, not as many as the Saudi puppets have, but many. Hopefully material support for his organization will be cut off as well.
 
I live in Section 8 housing, and would be happy to try and non-autistically answer any questions anybody might have about it.

But I also live in Arizona. This isn't black people central. You gotta find some brokedick, elderly, and/or disabled Kiwi in... I dunno... Chicago, if you want answers about that.
 
Last edited:
  • Optimistic
Reactions: The Last Stand
I believe that the left has all the best weapons (social-engineering tricks), and we should appropriate them.

The left (which corresponds to Orwell's Inner Party) and the right (Outer Party) had a rarely spoken of policy for dealing with the European peoples. This policy was "managed decline".

* Keep white people divided along every possible line in excess of division normally present; including economic and social class, religion, ethnicity, sex, parental status, physical and mental and social abilities, age, political parties, social/societal preferences, sexual preference, sexual identity (which TBH is a very boutique upper class signalling phenomenon), manufactured consumer identities such as gamers or stoners or pop-music fans, military veteran status, and so on and so forth. Though I will grant that some of these "identities" are the result of mental illness, personality disorders, addiction, and severe childhood sexual abuse; and even if such people were "based and redpilled" they would still be liabilities (see also: tradwives).

* Prevent them from breeding by limiting their access to economic opportunity, taxing them excessively, anti-natalist and pro-miscegination propaganda, by encouraging sterilization of youth via sex reassignment surgery and criminalizing opposition to the same, by exposing youth to sexual predators who seek to convert them into perversion via rape, and by exposing youth to violent and homicidal criminals in their day-to-day lives in the hope they will be dead or addicted to drugs before they reproduce.

* Use tax revenue farmed from straight white males to give disproportionate economic opportunity to enemies of the same, to import said enemies, and to encourage said enemies to breed in their homelands and conquered territories.

* Create and expand wars to kill and maim the most dangerous straight white men, who overwhelmingly form the bulk of line companies in all European militaries.

* When the right is in power, increase the scope of the police state; when the left is in power, purge good white men from the administrative state, install leftist cronies like Janet Reno and Madeline Albright, and let them run amok.

* Continuously centralize authority and power in the administrative state, no matter who is in power.

The above is but a subset of the methods used to gradually eradicate white people from the Earth, but it is a "good enough" subset for my purposes because:

1. It allows us to judge whether an entity is working in our favor.

2. It gives us a rough* blueprint to use against our enemies.

With this in mind, should we care that Trump forced the government of Botswana to decriminalize buggery?

Is buggery good? No, it is harmful to the people of a nation as it spreads disease and reproduces itself via pederasty.

Are Botswanans our people, friends, or allies? No, they are not our race, they see us as their oppressors, and they want only our admiration, free shit, and white women.

Do we owe them anything, good or ill? We gave them infrastructure, technology, and education, so we don't owe them anything good. It's debatable if we owe them ill, but it is safer in the long run to genocide them - in a non-violent and plausibly deniable manner - and resettle their lands with our people (or at least our men and their women, as a servitor race). They can't colonize our lands if they don't exist.

Trump's actions whether he knows it or not are a necessary first step to annihilating the negro populations of the world. Liberalism is a weapon which achieves this effect on host populations, and Trump wields it well. "Liberalism for thee, not for me" is an excellent policy for our enemies.

With these four points in mind, Trump's imposition of pederastic buggery on Botswana is hereby unironically declared Based and Redpilled.

* I say only a rough blueprint because leftists and rightists differ in disposition and methods used by them will not always or even often work for us.

tl;dr

I agree with liberals that the blacks need to be more accepting of the gays, but for a rather different set of reasons.
 
Last edited:
Trump is not the best president, and neither the worst. Politics in US are so polarized, there's literally no way to stop the shitshow unless Trump resignes, which is not gonna happen. And even then, this probably will only pour even more gasoline on the fire. Whatever Trump will do, the opposite party will blame him no matter what.

This story has been done to death, it's not as interesting as it was before. I wish MrTickles were here, so we could debate him instead. His mental gymnastics were really a sight to behold.
 
  • Feels
Reactions: Kyria the Great
Bush got sucking viable babies brains out with a vacuum cleaner outlawed.

Why is abortion evil? It is generally mercy killing. Why should babies be forced to be raised by crazy feminists or stupid mothers who see their children as pawns? Why should babies be sent to overcrowded adoption centers where they will get psychological issues? Not everyone deserves to reproduce.

Banning only works on law abiding citizens. People will use backyard abortions instead killing even more people in more gruesome ways. That's not moral at all.

I don't think helping democrats reproduce will help with Section 8. I suggest putting them in jail if they destroy the house. For people who give a fuck, they should have social programs to help get employment and housing.

I agree with liberals that the blacks need to be more accepting of the gays, but for a rather different set of reasons.

This will never happen because of black lower IQ. Lower IQ makes you more religious.

I suggest an alternative method. Blacks are gayer than whites but they hide it. That spreads HIV to blacks of all sexual orientations instead of it being self-contained. That's why liberals don't preach social liberalism to lower IQ groups. It's a waste of time anyway because they won't have the intelligence to get the concept.

Liberals win and conservatives lose because liberals have subtle racism.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back