Debate user Ishtar on the White Race being doomed for extinction - Do non-Whites require total extermination to save Whitey?

I'm much smarter than you.
Let's give you that just for the purposes of this discussion.
You are still a humorless, sad, incredibly obsessed, obviously autistic person, while me:
Screenshot 2024-05-14 150703.png
Oh, and you are so intelligent and creative, that you have found out the BEST method to own your online "enemies" (lmao) - raging at them and personal insults.
Keep at it, they always work, I assure you :smug:

Screenshot 2024-05-14 150841.png
 
Let's give you that just for the purposes of this discussion.
You are still a humorless, sad, incredibly obsessed, obviously autistic person, while me:
View attachment 5988110
Oh, and you are so intelligent and creative, that you have found out the BEST method to own your online "enemies" (lmao) - raging at them and personal insults.
Keep at it, they always work, I assure you :smug:

View attachment 5988115
I got a kick out of this. This is like drawing him as soyjack and you as chad.
 
I got a kick out of this. This is like drawing him as soyjack and you as chad.
It doesn't really bring me any pleasure, to be completely honest. It's his own fault for persisting in this pointless autism that oscillates between desiring a genocide that will never come and he would probably faint at the sight of it, and a woe to us! attitude to the demographic issues faced by Europeans.
Oh, not to mention some philo-Semitic spice sprinkled up on top of it all.
Pure Internet brainrot.
 
I have come to this position not due to searing racial animus or a desire to out edge Hitler, but through a calm analysis of the material factors involved.

As everyone knows, land and space are limited, and resources are inherently scarce. Any resource Whites aren’t using is a loss to us. Whether that be water, raw earth minerals, arable land, and everything else.

Secondly competition is an iron law-it can be regulated but this just makes it slower and less final. The Chinese, Africans and Jews alike all have a collective “Will to Power” to expand and dominate, just like us, even if they express it differently. Every gain they make is a loss for us. A single Chinese or African child sucking in air is air that is not going in a White child’s lungs.

Zero sum conflict. That’s it. There is no other reason for global genocide other than this reality.

There are other reasons, such as the moral imperative to secure the future, or ecological preservation and protection, something only Whites can do. Same with space travel and the like.

We live in an interconnected world, ideas, technology and people are not held back by distance and time lag as they were even a century ago, much less 500 or a thousand years ago.

This means everything I have described-the savage struggle for resources, living space and domination will only intensify.

By the end of the century, I think the winner will be clear. And that winner will shape the future of the earth for millennia to come. If not so long as the earth itself shall last.

Let me address a few criticisms:

It’s wrong/human life has inherent value-this position is debatable, do the dead of millennia past have value? There is nothing stopping us from writing sad poems and getting misty eyed over the sacrifices we had to make. The dead are dead, and their life is no more. In a thousand years, if we win, we’ll forget about it and our descendants will have something else to feel guilty about. And I’d much rather have us 200 years hence feeling really guilty about the genocide in an all White world than feeling guilt now when other races use that against us.

It’s impractical: Biological, nuclear and chemical weapons exist. Nano technology is another avenue worth exploration. Drone warfare and robotics as well. With sufficient will it can be done.

It’s alienating/offensive: It absolutely is, most well adjusted White people will run the other direction from a discourse so vile, a rhetoric so ugly but saving the future is an ugly business. If White people can’t put aside their moral scruples long enough to see this through, then we will fall.

Or more succinctly.

1. There is one planet with limited resources.
2. There are multiple races that share this planet.
3. These races are in irreconcilable competition and one loss is another’s gain.
4. Therefore following premises one through three, global genocide is the only option.

That’s however many paragraphs reduced to four premises building off one another.
 
This is some 1990s thinking. Earth is huge. We are a speck on this fucking rock.
About a third of the earth’s land is used for agriculture. I haven’t checked the numbers yet, but what 5% of it is urban? Resources are dwindling and space is in fact limited.

Colonizing the ocean or the upper atmosphere requires technology we don’t have and just kicks the can down the road anyway.

There are far too many people on the planet. 1 billion is probably an ideal number. Which coincidentally is the rough estimate for the global White population.

1.4 billion blacks, all of Asia makes what 3 billion? 4? 3.5?

Latin America is 90% Mestizo, and Austronesia is mostly non White as well.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: The Deep State
About a third of the earth’s land is used for agriculture. I haven’t checked the numbers yet, but what 5% of it is urban? Resources are dwindling and space is in fact limited.

Colonizing the ocean or the upper atmosphere requires technology we don’t have and just kicks the can down the road anyway.

There are far too many people on the planet. 1 billion is probably an ideal number. Which coincidentally is the rough estimate for the global White population.

1.4 billion blacks, all of Asia makes what 3 billion? 4? 3.5?

Latin America is 90% Mestizo, and Austronesia is mostly non White as well.
Motherfucker there are entire swaths of the US that are uninhabited federal land. Africa is barely explored, Russia and Canada have there permafrost, and Australia has the entire Middle to colonize if we had to. We aren't running out of land. You're retarded.
 
Resources being limited is not something Ishtar is wrong about.
You guys need to stop reflexively hating all shit somebody says just because he's weird or autistic about it.
Ishtar is wrong about his lamentations, about philo-Semitism, and about his genocidal inclinations.
He's not wrong about tribal competition for land and resources. Millions have died for that shit and millions will continue to die.
I am quite annoyed when I see Westerners, nearly always sheltered from actual conflict, pontificating about how there's enough for everyone.
No there's not, and it's obvious.
 
1. There is one planet with limited resources.
2. There are multiple races that share this planet.
3. These races are in irreconcilable competition and one loss is another’s gain.
4. Therefore following premises one through three, global genocide is the only option.

That’s however many paragraphs reduced to four premises building off one another.
Screenshot_20240514_063240_Chrome.jpg
Off to the nutt ripper room with you.

Not all points are bad, but I'd rather listen to a educated professional talk about this than you.
 
Back